当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

清华简与先秦《诗》类文献研究

发布时间:2018-03-04 14:27

  本文选题:清华简 切入点:先秦 出处:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:清华简主要涉及经、史类文献,具有很高的学术价值。到目前为止,已经公布的清华简中与乐诗有关的是《耆夜》、《周公之琴舞》、《芮良夫毖》三篇文献。本文对清华简乐诗及先秦《诗》类文献的研究也主要围绕这三篇文献展开。本文共分为四章:第一章:笔者首先对清华简乐诗的成书年代进行考证。清华简经过碳14测定,其出土年代约是战国中晚期,但并不能简单的将三篇清华简诗类文献的成书年代都归为战国中晚期。战国中晚期仅是其抄写年代,具体的创作年代,要根据乐诗考订。通过出土文献与传世文献对比,笔者断定《耆夜》乐诗的成书年代在西周中期到春秋时期。《周公之琴舞》是周朝初年的作品,而《芮良夫毖》是西周末年周厉王时期的乐诗。第二章:在本章中对清华简的真伪进行了考辨。自清华简问世,学者们围绕清华简真伪展开激烈争论,但多数从技术或史事方面进行讨论。笔者试图从乐诗的角度证明清华简为真。主要从清华简乐诗的用词、用韵方面对其真伪进行鉴别。通过考证,笔者认为清华简是真简,绝非现代人伪造。第三章:本章对清华简乐诗与“孔子删诗”问题进行了研究。“孔子删诗”问题在史学界一直争论不休,没有定论。而清华简乐诗的面世为研究“孔子删诗”问题提供了新史料。笔者认为,《诗经》在孔子之前就有固定的版本在流传,清华简乐诗的出土为孔子可能编订《诗经》的观点提供了证据。笔者从孔子生平结合春秋时期朝聘赋诗背景进行论证,得出孔子仅是对《诗经》的文字进行润色,对《诗经》的章节进行编排,并没有删去《诗经》的篇目。第四章:在前三章研究清华简的基础上,笔者总结出了先秦时期《诗》类文献的一些特点。主要表现为:在流传版本方面,先秦时期《诗经》版本繁多,多通假字,并且有逸诗存在;在流传地域方面,先秦时期《诗经》流传的地域宽广;在影响方面,先秦时期《诗经》影响深远。
[Abstract]:Qinghua Bamboo slips are mainly concerned with classics and historical literature, which are of high academic value. So far, The published three documents in the Qing Hua bamboo slips related to music poems are "the night of the aged", "the piano dance of Zhou Gong" and "Ruiliangfu avoid". The research of this paper also focuses on these three documents. The paper is divided into four chapters: chapter one: the author first makes textual research on the writing age of the Jianle poems of Tsinghua, which is determined by carbon 14. The unearthed period is about the middle and late warring States period, but it can not be simply classified as the middle and late warring States period. By comparing the unearthed literature with the literature handed down, the author concludes that the writing time of the music poems was from the middle of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn period. "the piano and dance of the Duke of Zhou" is the work of the early Zhou Dynasty. "Rui Liangfu avoid" is a musical poem of Zhou Liwang's period in the late Western Zhou Dynasty. Chapter two: in this chapter, the authenticity of Tsinghua Bamboo slips has been studied and distinguished. Since the birth of Tsinghua Bamboo slips, scholars have started a heated debate about the authenticity of Tsinghua Bamboo slips. But most of them are discussed from the aspects of technology or history. The author tries to prove that Tsinghua Jian is true from the point of view of music poetry. Mainly from the point of view of the words of Qing Hua Jian Yue poem, the author uses rhyme to identify its authenticity. Through textual research, the author thinks that Tsinghua bamboo slips are true. Chapter three: this chapter studies the problems of "Confucius deleting poetry" and "Qing Hua Jian Le poem". "Confucius censored poem" has been debated endlessly in the field of history. There is no final conclusion. However, the appearance of the Qing Hua Jian Yue poem provides new historical data for studying the issue of "Confucius deleting poetry." the author believes that the Book of songs had a fixed version in circulation before Confucius. The unearthed poems of Jian Le in Qinghua provide evidence for the viewpoint that Confucius may compile the Book of songs. The author demonstrates Confucius' life and life combined with the background of the Chao-pengfu poem during the Spring and Autumn period, and concludes that Confucius only embellished the text of the Book of songs. The chapters of the Book of songs were arranged without deleting the title of the Book of songs. Chapter 4th: on the basis of the previous three chapters of the study of Tsinghua slips, The author summarizes some characteristics of the literature of "poem" in the pre-Qin period. The main manifestations are as follows: there are many versions of the "Book of songs" in the pre-Qin period, and there are many false characters, and there are free poems, and in the area of circulation, there are many versions of the "Book of songs" in the pre-Qin period. The Book of songs in the pre-Qin period has a wide range of territory, and has a profound influence on the influence of the Book of songs in the pre-Qin period.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.22

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 胡平生;韩自强;;阜阳汉简《诗经》简论[J];文物;1984年08期

2 张文勋;以“政教”为中心的先秦儒家文艺思想[J];文史哲;1986年04期

3 黄宏信;;阜阳汉简《诗经》异文研究[J];江汉考古;1989年01期

4 陈伟;郭店楚简别释[J];江汉考古;1998年04期

5 周桂钿;《郭店楚墓竹简·缁衣》研究札记[J];孔子研究;1999年01期

6 傅道彬;“诗可以观”——春秋时代的观诗风尚及诗学意义[J];文学评论;2004年05期

7 晁福林;从王权观念变化看上博简《诗论》的作者及时代[J];中国社会科学;2002年06期

8 高华平;上博简《孔子诗论》的论诗特色及其作者问题[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2002年05期

9 晁福林;从上博简《诗论》对于《木瓜》篇的评析看《诗经》编纂问题[J];史学史研究;2005年01期

10 弭良满;;《诗经》宴饮诗探析[J];辽宁师范大学学报;2006年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 晁天义;周学军;;学界围绕清华简《耆夜》真伪展开激辩[N];中国社会科学报;2013年

2 付林鹏;;由清华简《(耆)夜·乐诗》看周公的巫祝身份[N];中国文物报;2010年



本文编号:1566020

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/1566020.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cb601***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com