慎用“转韵律体”概念

发布时间：2018-03-25 11:15

本文选题：七言　切入点：歌行　出处：《文学遗产》2017年04期

【摘要】：正《文学遗产》2016年第2期发表张培阳《论七言转韵律体的体制特征》一文(以下简称张文)。文章篇幅很长,也下了很大功夫,笔者很欣赏这篇文章,但主张慎用"转韵律体"概念。张文摘要云:"元明以来所说‘歌行’或‘七言古诗’,有些确为古诗,有些则为律体。"于是有"七言转韵律体"之称,但"转韵律体"的概念是不准确的,或者说是容易引起误解的。
[Abstract]:The second issue of "Literary Heritage" in 2016 published an article by Zhang Peiyang on the Institutional characteristics of the Seven-character Rhythm (hereinafter referred to as Zhang Wen). The article is very long in length and devoted to a great deal of effort. The author appreciates this article very much. Zhang Wen, however, advocated careful use of the concept of "changing rhyme style". Zhang Wen said: "some of the ancient poems said since the Yuan and Ming dynasties, some of which are ancient poems, and some of them are legal ones." thus, he was called "seven-character to rhythmic style." But the concept of Rhythm is inaccurate or misleading.
【作者单位】：河北大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I207.22

【相似文献】