李健吾自然主义文学批评思想研究的困境与突破

发布时间：2018-04-12 06:29

本文选题：李健吾 + 自然主义　；参考：《青海社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：学术界对于李健吾文学批评思想的研究,目前基本囿于"京派批评"或"印象式批评"的模式久难突破。造成如此困境之因,大致有三:一则李健吾文学批评的纯美追求不太符合当时特定语境中的文艺政治审美需求,如果将其还原到历史现场去审视,难免会受当时主流的价值观影响;二为当下学术界据二手资料做研究的不良风气使然,从二手资料阐释出的结果严重背离了李健吾的本义;三是李健吾的文学批评思想是以自然主义为主导的,而自然主义文艺思想曾被视为现实主义的反动而广受批判,致使我们至今无法客观正视之。只有直视李健吾的文学批评是以自然主义为基石的事实,才能更加深入而全面地研究他的思想,也有助于我们更加理性地面对自然主义在中国传播的过程中所产生的诸种变异。
[Abstract]:At present, the academic research on Li Jianwu's literary criticism is basically confined to the pattern of "Beijing School criticism" or "impression criticism", which is difficult to break through for a long time.There are three reasons for this dilemma: for one thing, Li Jianwu's pursuit of pure beauty in literary criticism does not conform to the aesthetic needs of literature and art in the specific context of that time. If he reverts it to the scene of history to examine it,It is inevitable that it will be influenced by the mainstream values at that time; second, it is caused by the bad atmosphere that the academic circles do research according to the second-hand materials, and the results explained from the second-hand materials seriously deviate from the original meaning of Li Jianwu;Thirdly, Li Jianwu's literary criticism thought is dominated by naturalism, and naturalistic literary thought has been regarded as reactionary and widely criticized, which makes us unable to face it objectively.Only by looking directly at the fact that Li Jianwu's literary criticism is based on naturalism can we study his thoughts more deeply and comprehensively and help us to face more rationally all kinds of variations in the process of naturalism spreading in China.
【作者单位】：江西师范大学;
【基金】：第55批中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“‘三化’涵濡:自然主义文论在中国的传播与接受研究”(项目号:2014M551863) 江西省博士后科研择优资助项目“自然主义文学和理论在中国的传播和接受研究”(项目号:2014KY28)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I206.6

【相似文献】