我国传统论赞文体的源流及其与敦煌佛赞之异同

发布时间：2018-04-17 18:08

本文选题：论赞 + 文体　；参考：《兰州学刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：我国传统论赞文体起源很早,后来论赞发生分流,论在形式上表现为散体文字,赞在形式上为整齐的四言句式。敦煌佛赞有的继承了我国历史上人物赞和史赞的传统,也为整齐的四言体式,而大部分佛赞作品为七言或五言诗体形式。笔者在对我国古代论赞形式的源流变化进行梳理的基础上,进一步探讨敦煌佛赞与我国传统论赞的异同及其在形式上的继承与发展,指出敦煌佛赞形式中包含有印度古代重视赞叹传统的因素,体式上为整齐的诗体形式,因而统称其为佛教"赞歌"更为确切。
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional style of Zan originated very early, and later on, Zan was separated. In form, Zan was expressed in scattered characters, and in form, it was a neat four-character sentence pattern.Some of Dunhuang Buddhas' praise inherits the tradition of figures' praise and Szan in the history of our country, and it is also a neat four-character style, while most of the Buddha's works are in the form of seven-character or five-character poetry.On the basis of combing the source and course changes of the ancient form of praise in our country, the author further discusses the similarities and differences between Dunhuang Buddha's praise and Chinese traditional style of praise, as well as their inheritance and development in form.It is pointed out that the form of Buddhist praise in Dunhuang contains the factors of attaching great importance to the tradition of praise in ancient India, and it is more accurate to call it the "hymn" of Buddhism.
【作者单位】：敦煌研究院民族宗教文化所;
【基金】：国家社科基金西部项目“佛教影响下的敦煌文学”(项目批准号:11XZW009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I206.2

【相似文献】