“顺着说”与“倒着说”:传统文学思想史研究中的学术自信问题

发布时间：2018-04-22 10:20

  本文选题：顺着说 + 倒着说　； 参考：《人文杂志》2017年11期

【摘要】：在民族文化复兴的当代语境中,知识界确有必要深刻反思百余年来西学援引的种种后遗症,确有必要甄别"顺着说""倒着说""接着说"在文化立场、价值导向以及方法范式上的根本不同。不同于"倒着说"建立在各种西学"后见之明"的理论预设上,"顺着说"是按照中国文学思想的本然脉络和固有方法研究批评史的。两者在文化立场、价值导向以及方式方法上有着根本的不同。
[Abstract]:In the contemporary context of the revival of national culture, it is really necessary for the intellectual circles to reflect deeply on the various sequelae cited by Western studies over the past hundred years, and to distinguish between "following the saying" and "saying the opposite" and then saying "from the cultural standpoint". There are fundamental differences in value orientation and methodological paradigm. Different from the theoretical presupposition of "inverted theory", which is based on various western studies, it is based on the original context and inherent method of Chinese literary thought to study the history of criticism. There are fundamental differences in cultural standpoint, value orientation and method between the two.
【作者单位】： 曲阜师范大学孔子文化研究院;首都师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“儒家早期文学价值观研究”(16AZW001)
【分类号】：I206.2
，

本文编号：1786796