《白虎通义》的言说方式及其价值研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 10:18

本文选题：《白虎通义》 + 言说方式　；参考：《西南大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《白虎通义》是在东汉章帝亲自干预学术活动的情况下脱胎的政治性文件。它上承西周以来的神学天命观,吸纳董仲舒《春秋》公羊学“天人感应”的基本思维模式,以阴阳五行为基本框架,征引五经等今古文经学文本,折射出了东汉的政治、学术思想与今古文经学的状貌,有着深厚的学术与文献价值,被誉为“封建教科书”。自清以降,《白虎通义》被定性为“经解类”文献,对其研究缺乏重视,其原因少有人探究。目前除考据等方面的研究成果外,学界主要聚焦于声训、哲学、政治、纲常、经学等领域,鲜有文学性的研究,对其整个构思脉络的分析尚未见成果。现立足于分析《白虎通义》的文学特色,通过对其言说方式的论述,力图还原其产生的真实动因,探讨其目录学归属与性质等问题,透析《白虎通义》与章帝制礼等关系。本文拟对《白虎通义》研究面临的一系列问题以言说方式为切入点进行探究,由绪论、正文(共六章)、结语三部分构成。绪论以敷陈《白虎通义》的研究近况为主体,言明本文选题的因由、价值及研究方法。第一章,对“言说方式”的概念进行粗浅界定。鉴于“言说方式”这一术语的权威性研究译著寥寥无几,国内使用者又多持含混的态度,“用”多于“思”,“言说方式”的概念界定成为了一个被学界疏漏的问题。此章以目前学术成果中出现的“言说方式”为背景,提炼出具有代表性的“言说方式”的文献资料,从阐释学、修辞学、文体学角度加以归纳、区分,继而总结出“言说方式”的内涵。第二章,讨论目前关于《白虎通义》尚未定论且具有重大价值的问题。《白虎通义》的目录学归属与性质等问题仍莫衷一是,这与白虎观会议召开的目的、缘起与《白虎通义》文本呈现的驳杂性均有很大关系。关于其性质的辨析,笔者佐以《白虎通义》文本之内容构成进行初步说明。此章所罗列的具有争议性与不确定性的问题正是本文力图解决的,也为下文通过言说方式来解析这一系列问题做铺垫。第三章,分析《白虎通义》言说方式中的问答思辨之论述体例与独特的言语艺术。《白虎通义》文本的问答对话体式十分鲜明,将《白虎通义》的问答与汉大赋的主客问答相联系,且对其内容条分缕析,将《白虎通义》的问答形式进行分类、统计,总结出14类问答行文模式。依照文本中的多种甚而相悖的条文,揭示出这个“称制临决”的会议背后所隐含的时代之礼制缺失的困境。从其训诂的运用与章句元素的穿插角度,穷极一切的附会阴阳五行的角度,凸显其独特的言语特色。第四章,分析《白虎通义》言说方式中的引经据典之论证形式。该部分统计归纳了征引的五经今古文经学文本、谶纬等内容。意图揭示《白虎通义》并未触及到“讲议五经异同”这一事实,多方征引是章帝面对礼乐意识形态的匮乏所做出的理论搜罗。第五章,探讨《白虎通义》问答行文与训诂章句穿插这一言说方式的意义:“正名”。问答行文,“答”是关键,“问”可以忽略,这是章帝“决断”的专制表征。训诂与“章句”的运用,形成了一种以阐说义理为主导的名词解释性言语,这是政治干预学术的规约性表征。正名的意图是使一切事物道德化,利用道德的象征意义掩饰制度的不平等与美化政权。第六章,探究言说方式之“存异说”与多方“引典”的价值。东汉章帝时期礼乐制度理据缺失,故需多方征引、搜集。此部分从西汉以来官方主流意识形态的礼制缺失梳理,过渡到《白虎通义》中礼制缺失的表现,从而阐明《白虎通义》与礼制的关系。证实白虎观会议的发起是章帝为制作汉礼所做的筹备工作。援引经典的“多”与“杂”牵涉出《白虎通义》与杂家的关系考辨,从而对《白虎通义》的性质与分类归属问题做新的探究。
[Abstract]:The "white tiger" is a political document of the Eastern Han Dynasty Zhang Emperor himself intervened in the academic activities. It has inherited the basic thinking mode of Dong Zhongshu's theology since the Western Zhou Dynasty, and absorbed the basic thinking mode of the "heaven and man induction" in the study of the spring and autumn and autumn and the goats. It has a profound academic and literature value, which has a profound academic and literature value, and has been praised as a "feudal textbook". Since the Qing Dynasty, "the white tiger" is defined as the "Confucian classics", it lacks attention to its research, and its reasons are seldom explored. In addition to the research results of the textual research, the academic circles mainly focus on sound training and philosophy. There are few literary studies in the fields of learning, politics, program and study, and there are few achievements in the analysis of the whole conception. Based on the analysis of the literary features of the "white tiger", the paper tries to restore the real motivation of its production by discussing the ways of his speech, and discusses the problems of the attribution and nature of its catalogues and so on. This article intends to explore a series of problems in the study of the "white tiger" meaning, which is an introduction to the way of speaking. It is made up of the introduction, the text (six chapters) and the conclusion of the three part. In view of the definition of the term, there are few authoritative studies on the term "way of speech", and the domestic users are more ambiguous, "use" more than "thought", and the definition of "way of speaking" is a problem that has been neglected by the academic community. In the second chapter, the second chapter discusses the issue of the question of "White Tiger Tong Yi", which has not yet been determined and has significant value. There is still no agreement on the problem, which has a great relationship with the purpose of the white tiger view conference, the origin and the confusion of the text of the white tiger, and the author makes a preliminary explanation of the nature of the white tiger. The third chapter analyzes the series of questions by the way of speech. Chapter 1, the analysis of the style and the unique language art of the question and answer thinking in the "white tiger" meaning. The paper classifies the question and answer form of the "white tiger" and sums up the 14 types of question and answer pattern. According to the various articles in the text, it reveals the dilemma of the lack of etiquette in the times behind the meeting of the "called system to be decided". All of them are attached to the five lines of yin and Yang, highlighting their unique speech features. The fourth chapter analyses the form of the argumentation in the way of "white tiger meaning" and the way of speaking. The multiparty citation is the theoretical search of Zhang Di in the face of the lack of the ideology of etiquette and music. In the fifth chapter, it discusses the meaning of the interspersing of "white tiger meaning", "question answer" and "exegesis", "correct name", "question and answer", "answer" is the key, "question" can be ignored. This is the autocratic representation of Zhang Di's "decision". Exegesis and "chapter sentence" It has formed a kind of noun interpretive speech which is dominated by the theory of justice. This is the normative representation of the political intervention. The intention of the name is to make all things moralization and use the symbolic meaning of morality to disguise the system of unequal and beautify the regime. The sixth chapter is to explore the way of saying "save the difference" and "allusion". Value. The system of etiquette and music in the period of the Eastern Han Dynasty is missing, so it needs to be collected and collected in many ways. This part from the absence of the official mainstream ideology since the Western Han Dynasty, the transition to the expression of the lack of etiquette in the "white tiger", thus clarifying the relationship between the "white tiger" and the etiquette system. In the preparatory work, the classical "more" and "miscellaneous" were involved in the textual research of the relationship between the "white tiger" and the miscellaneous family, so as to make a new inquiry into the nature and classification of the "white tiger".
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.2

【参考文献】