袁无涯刊本《水浒传》原本问题及刊刻年代考辨——兼及李卓吾评本《水浒传》真伪问题

发布时间：2018-05-24 17:48

  本文选题：《水浒传》 + 袁无涯本　； 参考：《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：在《水浒传》研究中,一般认为容与堂本刊刻于袁无涯本之前。最早对此提出疑议的是章培恒先生,并对此给出一些旁证。美国哥伦比亚大学藏本《读升庵集》扉页之出版告白是解决这一问题的重要线索,但向来未受重视。以《读升庵集》扉页之告白结合相关文献进行研究,可知袁无涯原刊本的刊刻时间早于容与堂本,大约刊刻于万历三十七年(1609)至万历三十八年(1610)之间,并且可以确定容与堂本是叶昼伪托李贽的评点本。同时,通过现存多种版本的校勘,可知现存袁无涯本并非原刻本,其中评点已非完全的李卓吾评点原貌;现存大涤余人序本保留了李卓吾评本的原貌,而大涤余人序本的祖本是袁无涯刊刻的李卓吾评点《水浒传》之原刊本。
[Abstract]:In the study of Outlaws of the Marsh, it is generally believed that Rong and Tang Ben were engraved before Yuan's boundless book. Mr. Zhang Peiheng was the first to raise doubts about this, and gave some circumstantial evidence. The publication of the title page of Columbia University's Collection, "Reading an album", is an important clue to solve this problem, but it has never been paid much attention to. Through the study of the confession on the title page of "Reading the Collection of Sheng'an" and the relevant documents, it can be seen that the original edition of Yuan Wuya was printed earlier than Rong and Tang, and was about printed between 1609 (37 years of Wanli) and 1610 (38 years of Wanli). And it can be determined that Rong-Heisang is the comment book of Ye-day-pseudo-Toto-Li Zhi. At the same time, through the current collation of various versions, we can see that the existing Yuan Wu-Ya Ben is not the original engraved version, in which Li Zhuowu's comments on the original appearance are not complete, and that the extant Da Li Yu's preface has preserved the original appearance of Li Zhuo-wu 's commentary. And the ancestor of the preface of Da-Li Yu is the original edition of Li Zhuowu's comment on Water margin.
，

本文编号：1929984