当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 中国文学论文 >

鲁迅晚年对打破“历史恶性循环”的思考与新文化的建构

发布时间:2018-06-13 15:52

  本文选题:鲁迅 + 阶级论 ; 参考:《鲁迅研究月刊》2017年10期


【摘要】:正一对鲁迅后期思想的研究存在两种偏向。一种是贬抑前期而抬高后期,普遍的公式是"从进化论到阶级论",认为鲁迅后期实现了世界观的伟大转变,提升到马克思主义的阶级论高度;另一种是否定后期,认为鲁迅后期进入了政治误区,中断了前期发展到颠峰的文学创作,留下极大遗憾。我的观点与这两种倾向都有所不同,认为鲁迅后期确实接受了阶级论,但他的阶级论与一般阶级论是有区别的;中断了发展到颠峰的《彷徨》《野草》时期的文学创作,的确
[Abstract]:There are two biases in the study of Lu Xun's late thought. The general formula is "from evolution to class theory," which holds that Lu Xun realized the great transformation of the world outlook and promoted it to the level of class theory of Marxism. The other is the later stage of negation. The author thinks that Lu Xun entered the political misunderstanding in the later period, and interrupted the literary creation which developed to the peak in the early stage, leaving great regret. My point of view is different from these two tendencies, and I think that Lu Xun did accept class theory in the later period, but his class theory and general class theory are different; and the literary creation of the period of "wandering to the peak", which developed to the peak of "weeds", was indeed interrupted.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】:I210

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 黄海澄;典型性仅仅是“阶级性的集中表现”吗?[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1979年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 黄丽莉;“阶级论”与“十七年”小说中爱情结局研究[D];西南大学;2014年



本文编号:2014554

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2014554.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户acd58***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com