许学夷与叶燮“正变”说比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 02:25

本文选题：许学夷 + 叶燮　；参考：《湖北民族学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：许学夷与叶燮皆是中国古代著名的诗学理论家,近年来,关于许学夷与叶燮“正变”说的比较研究,风毛鳞角。虽有相关文章涉及,但其研究没有深入展开,尚未形成公论。本文以许学夷《诗源辩体》与叶燮《原诗》为研究文本,试图对许学夷与叶燮的“正变”说进行比较研究,以阐明许学夷与叶燮“正变”说的诗学内涵,以及二者的正变价值取向。本文由绪论、正文、结语三部分组成。绪论部分主要简析评述近三十年国内外关于许学夷与叶燮“正变”说的研究现状,并阐述本研究课题的选题背景及现实意义。正文共分为三章,主要比较研究许学夷与叶燮的“正变”说。第一章从诗之源流与诗之正变两方面比较分析许学夷与叶燮诗歌发展观的异同。在诗之源流上,许学夷与叶燮虽然都继承了《三百篇》为源、《三百篇》而后为流的论诗传统,但在审其诗之源和诗之流时,论述的方式迥异。关于诗之源,许学夷的论述呈现出多元性,可以归结为“源之正”,叶燮的论述呈现出整体性,可以归结为“源之盛”;关于诗之流,许学夷以“世次定盛衰”而论,叶燮以“递衰递盛”而论。在诗之正变上,许学夷与叶燮都继承了“风雅正变”思想,但在审其诗之正变时,论述的方式迥异。关于诗歌正变之规律,许学夷从诗歌自律与他律的维度,认为“同正异变”,叶燮从“正变系乎时”与“正变系乎诗”的维度,认为“正变互为循环”;关于诗之变,许学夷以“变而入神”为最高境界,叶燮以“变能启盛”为诗歌发展的动力与整体趋势。第二章从创作主体与创作方法两方面比较分析许学夷与叶燮正变创作论的异同。关于创作主体,许学夷与叶燮认为创作主体的识、才力与诗歌发展密切相关。许学夷提出“识为主,才力辅之”,有识正变自分,才力既大而诗之善变。叶燮提出“识为体才为用”,有识是非明,力大才坚而诗之大变,自成一家。关于创作方法,许学夷与叶燮虽然都强调创作中对“正”与“变”的把握,但又略有不同。许学夷从诗歌体制规范之正与体式格调而论,提出“体有常法”、“格有所限”;叶燮则以“死法”与“活法”而论,强调诗歌创作应遵循诗歌固有的形式规范与创新。而在取法于古人上,许学夷强调“取古人所长,济己之短。”叶燮则主张“不忽略古人,不附会古人”。第三章,从对七子师古论和公安派、竟陵派师心论的批判中比较分析许学夷与叶燮力图调和崇正与主变的正变批评论的异同。对于七子师古论的批判,许学夷与叶燮在分别以“于道为过”和“排变崇正”揭示其崇正思想偏颇的同时,又主张对其做理性分析和择优阐述,并分别以“于正有得”和“执源弃流”对其立足于正给予肯定。对于公安派、竟陵派师心论的批判,许学夷与叶燮在分别以“于道为离”和“矫枉过正”揭示其主变思想偏颇的同时,也分别以“于变有得”和“得流弃源”对其立足于变给予肯定。结语部分总结分析许学夷与叶燮“正变”说对传统诗学的继承与发展。
[Abstract]:Xu Xueyi and Ye Xie are the famous poetics theorists of ancient China. In recent years, the comparative study of Xu Xue and Xie Xie's "positive change" has been studied. Although there are related articles, the research has not been carried out in depth and has not yet formed a public comment. This article is a study of the text of the study of Xu Xue Yuan < poetry source > and Ye Xie < original poem > as the research text, trying to make a study of Xu Xueyi. A comparative study of the "positive change" theory of Ye Xie is made to clarify the poetic connotation of Xu Xue and Ye Xie's "positive change", as well as the positive value orientation of the two. This article is composed of the introduction, the text and the conclusion of the three parts. The introduction is a brief review of the current research status on the theory of Xu Xue Yi and the "positive change" of Xu Yi and Ye Xie in the past thirty years. The text is divided into three chapters. The main part is to compare the "positive change" of Xu Xue and Ye Xie. In the first chapter, the differences and similarities between Xu Xue and Ye Xie poetry are compared and analyzed from the two aspects of the origin of poetry and the positive change of poetry. < three hundred > the poem tradition of the later flow, but in the source of poetry and the stream of poetry, the way of discussion is quite different. On the source of the poem, Xu Xue's exposition is pluralistic, which can be attributed to "the source of the origin". Ye Xie's exposition is as a whole, which can be attributed to "the prosperity of the source"; and as to the flow of poetry, Xu Xueyi is "in prosperity and decline of the world". On the positive change of poetry, Xu Xue and Xie Xie inherited the thought of "elegance and change" in the positive change of poetry, but in the positive change of the poem, the way of discourse is quite different. In the second chapter, the second chapter compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between Xu Xueyi and Ye Xiezheng's theory of creation from the two aspects of the creative subject and the creation method. As the main body, Xu Xue and Ye Xie think that the creative subject's knowledge and talent are closely related to the development of poetry. Xu Xue proposed that "knowledge is the main part and talent is supplemented". Although Yi and Ye Xie all emphasize the grasp of "positive" and "change" in his creation, he has a slight difference. Xu Xue Yi, from the positive and physical style of the system of poetry, puts forward the "body and the law" and "the limit of the grid". Ye Xieze, with the "death law" and the "living law", emphasizes that poetry should follow the formal norms and creation of poetry. In the third chapter, from the criticism of the ancient theory of the seven sons and the public security school and the criticism of the Jingling School, Xu Xie analyzed the similarities and differences between Xu Xue and Ye Xie trying to adjust the criticism and the criticism of the main change. The critique of the ancient theory of the seven sons, Xu Xue and Xie Xie, at the same time of revealing the bias of his advocating thought by "Yu Tao is over" and "row change advocating", advocated a rational analysis and preferred exposition of it, and affirmed his foothold on Yu Zheng on the basis of "Yu Zheng has got" and "abandoning the flow of the source". At the same time, Xu Xue and Ye Xie, respectively, reveal the biased ideas of the main changes in their main changes, respectively, and give their foothold in the transformation. The concluding remarks summarize and analyze the inheritance and development of the traditional poetics by Xu Xue and Ye Xie.
【学位授予单位】：湖北民族学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22

【参考文献】