虚构判定的几个原则——以何大草《盲春秋》的序跋为例
发布时间：2018-07-29 05:54
【摘要】：何大草的小说《盲春秋》的序跋挑战了叙述学中的虚构判定方法,也给叙述学中的虚构判定问题以启示。通过对它的分析,可以总结出四条关于虚构判定的原则:(一)体裁形式与虚构性互为判定依据;(二)声源人物不影响叙述内容的虚构性判定;(三)虚构与纪实可以交叉;(四)纪实或虚构最终由读者决定。
[Abstract]:The preface and postscript of he Dacao's novel "Blind Spring and Autumn" challenge the method of judging fiction in narratology and enlighten the problem of fictional judgment in narratology. By analyzing it, Four principles of fictional judgment can be summarized: (1) the form of genre and fictitious form are the basis for judging each other; (2) the character of sound source does not affect the judgment of fictitious structure of narrative content; (3) fiction and documentary can intersect; (4) documentary facts can be intersected. Or fiction is ultimately up to the reader.
【作者单位】： 四川师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.42
，
本文编号：2151740
[Abstract]:The preface and postscript of he Dacao's novel "Blind Spring and Autumn" challenge the method of judging fiction in narratology and enlighten the problem of fictional judgment in narratology. By analyzing it, Four principles of fictional judgment can be summarized: (1) the form of genre and fictitious form are the basis for judging each other; (2) the character of sound source does not affect the judgment of fictitious structure of narrative content; (3) fiction and documentary can intersect; (4) documentary facts can be intersected. Or fiction is ultimately up to the reader.
【作者单位】： 四川师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.42
，
本文编号：2151740
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2151740.html
