以书喻诗:明代复古派的书学与诗学
发布时间：2018-10-09 13:45
【摘要】：以书喻诗是明代复古诗学重要的批评策略,其上源自于苏轼与严羽,而后大盛于前七子、后七子以及末五子,这种将书学与诗学并举的言说方式,旨在取法书学的复古品格,为诗学上的复古找到理论上的根据,并形成了古雅的美学概念。进而言之,复古派突破书学与诗学外在美学形态的相通,上升到创作实践的高度,强调以书法临摹的方式来进行诗歌创作。总之,明代复古派正是以以书喻诗的方式确立了一套成熟的诗法观念,为复古思想在有明一代的大行其道奠定了基础。
[Abstract]:Metaphorical poetry is an important criticism strategy of retro ancient poetics in the Ming Dynasty, which originated from Su Shi and Yan Yu, and then flourished in the first seven sons, the latter seven sons and the last five sons. To find the theoretical basis for the retro-antiquity of poetics, and form the aesthetic concept of quaint. Furthermore, the retro school broke through the combination of calligraphy and poetics in the form of external beauty, and rose to the height of creative practice, emphasizing the creation of poetry by means of calligraphy copying. In a word, the retro school in Ming Dynasty established a set of mature poetic ideas by the way of metaphorical poetry, which laid a foundation for the great popularity of the retro thought in the Ming Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 天津科技大学法政学院;
【基金】：天津市哲学社会科学规划课题“明前期文人的书画活动与台阁文学研究”[项目编号:TJZW16-002Q]阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.22
本文编号：2259552
[Abstract]:Metaphorical poetry is an important criticism strategy of retro ancient poetics in the Ming Dynasty, which originated from Su Shi and Yan Yu, and then flourished in the first seven sons, the latter seven sons and the last five sons. To find the theoretical basis for the retro-antiquity of poetics, and form the aesthetic concept of quaint. Furthermore, the retro school broke through the combination of calligraphy and poetics in the form of external beauty, and rose to the height of creative practice, emphasizing the creation of poetry by means of calligraphy copying. In a word, the retro school in Ming Dynasty established a set of mature poetic ideas by the way of metaphorical poetry, which laid a foundation for the great popularity of the retro thought in the Ming Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 天津科技大学法政学院;
【基金】：天津市哲学社会科学规划课题“明前期文人的书画活动与台阁文学研究”[项目编号:TJZW16-002Q]阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.22
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李世宁;;李贽对文学复古派的批判[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1975年01期
2 王明建;;明代复古派诗论的言情观[J];文学评论;2012年05期
3 李思涯;;明代复古派文章论与文道关系的新变[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2013年02期
4 邹慧芳;;刘勰赋体观对明代复古派赋论的影响[J];语文知识;2013年01期
5 石麟;明代诗坛的复古倾向与复古派中坚李梦阳[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年02期
6 李朝正;杨慎的文学观及其对复古派的抗争[J];社会科学研究;1997年06期
7 廖可斌;茶陵派与复古派[J];求索;1991年02期
8 孙之梅;明代复古派的文学本体论[J];求是学刊;2003年04期
9 王琳,孙之梅;沈德潜对明代复古派理论的修正[J];齐鲁学刊;2004年02期
10 邓新跃;汤显祖与明代复古派文学思潮[J];三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张晓静;《沧浪诗话》与明代复古派诗论[D];山东师范大学;2005年
2 王勇;郑善夫研究[D];暨南大学;2010年
，本文编号：2259552
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2259552.html
