从山林到台阁——元明之际迄永宣间小说观念的变迁
发布时间：2018-10-31 20:46
【摘要】：元末明初,文人士夫何以由经史而折入小说,始终与其游走于"台阁"与"山林"之间的人生状态密切相关。如果说《剪灯新话》隐约透露出元明之际士大夫彷徨于仕与隐之间的两难困境,以及其志不伸遂不得已飘泊乱离的性命体验;那么,《剪灯余话》却已隆升为词林儒臣一时幽寓遂咎己自悼,或抚掌谈笑以申怀抱的载体。尽管当时小说的创作与传播远不如教坊演剧之盛,然而,小说这一台阁化的迹象,仍然可以追溯到元末杨维桢等人假小说以为声教的提出,并和明初官方试图以儒学内涵改造小说的努力联系起来,也即与永宣间教坊演剧的繁荣有着颇为相似的历史背景。然而,这一繁荣持续未久,正统七年国子监祭酒李时勉奏禁小说,正式标志了传奇的衰落。
[Abstract]:In the late Yuan Dynasty and early Ming Dynasty, why did the literary personage turn into the novel from the history of the classics, which is closely related to the life state of his wandering in the "Tai Pavilion" and "Mountain Forest" from the beginning of the Yuan Dynasty to the early Ming Dynasty. If we say "lantern cutting new words", it reveals the dilemma between scholar and bureaucrat in the Yuan and Ming dynasties, and their life experience that they had to drift away from each other. However, Lin Jushen's poems have become the carrier of mourning for himself, or touching his palm and laughing in his bosom. Although the creation and dissemination of novels at that time was far less prosperous than that of Jiefang operas, however, the signs of the novel's emergence can still be traced back to Yang Weizhen and other people's false novels in the late Yuan Dynasty. It is connected with the efforts of the government in the early Ming Dynasty to transform the novel with the connotation of Confucianism, that is, it has a rather similar historical background to the prosperity of the Yongxuan Jiefang drama. However, this prosperity lasted for a long time, the orthodox seven-year emperor Li Shimian ban on the novel, officially marked the decline of legend.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：I207.41
本文编号：2303496
[Abstract]:In the late Yuan Dynasty and early Ming Dynasty, why did the literary personage turn into the novel from the history of the classics, which is closely related to the life state of his wandering in the "Tai Pavilion" and "Mountain Forest" from the beginning of the Yuan Dynasty to the early Ming Dynasty. If we say "lantern cutting new words", it reveals the dilemma between scholar and bureaucrat in the Yuan and Ming dynasties, and their life experience that they had to drift away from each other. However, Lin Jushen's poems have become the carrier of mourning for himself, or touching his palm and laughing in his bosom. Although the creation and dissemination of novels at that time was far less prosperous than that of Jiefang operas, however, the signs of the novel's emergence can still be traced back to Yang Weizhen and other people's false novels in the late Yuan Dynasty. It is connected with the efforts of the government in the early Ming Dynasty to transform the novel with the connotation of Confucianism, that is, it has a rather similar historical background to the prosperity of the Yongxuan Jiefang drama. However, this prosperity lasted for a long time, the orthodox seven-year emperor Li Shimian ban on the novel, officially marked the decline of legend.
【作者单位】： 华东师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：I207.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 万晴川;《剪灯余话》简论[J];零陵师范高等专科学校学报;2000年01期
2 赖利明;宗教文化对《剪灯余话》的影响[J];北京教育学院学报;1999年02期
3 崔宏伟;韩贤克;;《剪灯余话》的奇特性[J];文学教育(下);2008年12期
4 王井辉;王欣妮;;论《剪灯余话》的诗化特征[J];短篇小说(原创版);2012年20期
5 王井辉;;论《剪灯余话》的创作思想[J];学理论;2008年14期
6 乔光辉;;论中国小说《剪灯余话》对朝鲜小说《金鳌新话》的影响[J];延边大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
7 王井辉;;《剪灯余话》爱情悲剧成因探析[J];语文建设;2013年09期
8 王井辉;;《剪灯余话》创作思想考论[J];作家;2013年04期
9 王慧林;;扬情与崇理——《剪灯新话》与《剪灯余话》情爱观之比较[J];名作欣赏;2011年23期
10 谢雅琴;;从《运甓漫稿》反观李昌祺《剪灯余话》的创作思想[J];浙江教育学院学报;2007年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 秦闻;明刊插图本《剪灯余话》图像叙事研究[D];江苏师范大学;2017年
2 郭荣也;李昌祺《剪灯余话》研究[D];赣南师范学院;2010年
，本文编号：2303496
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2303496.html
