李贽“童心说”与康德“美的本质”论之比较

发布时间：2018-01-05 18:14

本文关键词：李贽“童心说”与康德“美的本质”论之比较　出处：《鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：明中期资本主义萌芽兴起后,出现了新兴市民阶层个性自由要求与程朱理学"存天理,灭人欲"信条的矛盾,李贽就此提出了"童心说",一方面强调自然人性,要求每个人持童心、说真话、做真人;另一方面则肯定了每个人都是具有不同个性的生命主体,要求去伪存真保持真性情和个体的独立意识。且在其自身的文学创作和批评中将此原则一以贯之。康德在《判断力批判》中,也着重对"美的本质"进行了分析,二者观点存在内在的一致性。在当下中西文化汇通交流的开放语境中,把李贽的"童心说"与康德的"美的本质"分析论进行比较,有助于发掘二者共有的意蕴,从而展示中国先贤在思想文化观念上的超前性。
[Abstract]:After the sprout of capitalism in the middle of Ming Dynasty, there appeared the contradiction between the requirement of personality freedom of the new citizen stratum and the creed of Cheng Zhu Neo-Confucianism "keeping God in order to destroy people's desire". Li Zhi put forward the theory of "childlike heart" in this regard. On the one hand, the emphasis on natural and human nature requires everyone to hold a childlike heart, tell the truth, and be a real person; On the other hand, it affirms that everyone is the subject of life with different personality. It requires the identification of false things, the retention of real things to maintain true temperament and individual independent consciousness, and the application of this principle in his own literary creation and criticism. Kant in critique of judgment. It also focuses on the analysis of the essence of beauty. There is an inherent consistency between the two viewpoints, which is in the open context of the communication between Chinese and Western cultures. A comparison between Li Zhi's theory of "childlike heart" and Kant's "essence of beauty" will help to explore the common meaning of the two theories, and thus to show the forerunner of Chinese sages in their ideas and culture.
【作者单位】：南京大学文学院;
【分类号】：B248.91;B83-0
【正文快照】： 李贽(1527—1602)“童心说”与康德(1724—1804)在《判断力批判》上卷“美的本质”分析论中均讲述了在艺术作品的创作与鉴赏中需保持自然本真状态,不受礼教、传统道德束缚,满足天赋自然之心对艺术作品及其审美追求的原则。二者虽然各自源于东西两种不同文化,但是却有着内在一

【相似文献】