“生活美学”是这样可能的——评刘悦笛的《生活美学》

发布时间：2018-02-25 22:05

本文关键词： 生活美学生活的本质主体性审美主体审美客体　出处：《贵州社会科学》2009年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：刘悦笛提出"生活美学"的新主张,有其两个方面的深刻理由:其一,当代社会艺术与生活日趋同一使"艺术否定生活论"、"艺术自律论"及其理论基础"主体性美学"难以为继;其二,更高的、全面的现代性要求重构审美精神从而来论证"生活美学"的必要性。"生活美学"要得以确立,关键在于能否从本体论上论证生活与美之间的本质关系,并由此出发解释各种美学现象,刘悦笛以现象学的哲学视角为主,结合马克思、海德格尔、维特根斯坦和杜威的思想做到了这一点。但遗憾的是,"生活美学"的作者却没有对"生活"做出更为具体和准确的界说,"生活美学"要确立自己与实践美学和生命美学的特殊性和独立性,就必须说清楚生活与实践、生命等范畴的关系,理顺"生活美学"与实践美学、生命美学的关系。与此同时,"生活美学"试图在一种对生活的本质直观中超越主客二分的主体性美学。然而,超越主体性美学是可能的,但否定主体性或将主体性与客体性等量齐观于一种混沌状态中,却无异于返回到前现代美学,乃至返回到一种前人类的自然状态。历史上那些号称取消了主客二分的哲学和美学,无不暗中承认主体性的这一地位。但无疑,"生活"的确可以被解释成为一个比实践、生活更广的因而可以把实践、生活扬弃于自身之内的范畴,从而"生活美学"不仅可以成立而且是极具发展潜力。
[Abstract]:There are two profound reasons for Liu Yuidi's new idea of "life aesthetics": first, The unity of contemporary social art and life makes "art negates life theory", "art self-discipline theory" and its theoretical basis "subjective aesthetics" is difficult to continue; second, higher, Comprehensive modernity requires the reconstruction of aesthetic spirit to demonstrate the necessity of "life aesthetics". The key to the establishment of "life aesthetics" lies in whether the essential relationship between life and beauty can be demonstrated from an ontological point of view. And from this point of view to explain various aesthetic phenomena, Liu Yuadii mainly from the philosophical perspective of phenomenology, combined with Marx, Heidegger, Wittgenstein and Dewey did this. Unfortunately, the author of Life Aesthetics did not define "Life" more concretely and accurately. "Life Aesthetics" should establish itself and practical aesthetics and life. The particularity and independence of life aesthetics, We must clarify the relationship between life and practice, life and other categories, and straighten out "life aesthetics" and practical aesthetics. At the same time, "Life Aesthetics" tries to transcend the subjective aesthetics which transcends the dichotomy of subject and object in the intuition of the nature of life. However, it is possible to transcend the subjective aesthetics. But to deny subjectivity or to equate subjectivity with objectivism in a chaotic state is tantamount to returning to pre-modern aesthetics. And even return to the natural state of pre-human beings. In history, philosophy and aesthetics, which claim to eliminate the dichotomy between subject and object, implicitly recognize the status of subjectivity. But there is no doubt that "life" can be interpreted as a more practical one. As a result, practice and life can be sublimated in their own category, so that "life aesthetics" not only can be established but also has great potential for development.
【作者单位】：中国劳动关系学院;
【分类号】：B834.3

【相似文献】