“无所为而为”:从儒家心性之学到中国现代美学

发布时间：2018-02-27 08:19

本文关键词： 中国现代美学心性之学审美功利主义动机论意识形态论义利之辨审美现代性傅铜西方美学吴宓 　出处：《文艺研究》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："无所为而为"原属儒家心性之学对孟子"义利之辨"的阐释,从老子"无为无不为"演化而来,要求道德行为出自纯粹动机,成为宋明儒心性修治的核心教义。至清末民初西学东渐、国族救亡语境中,在对传统道德动机论的反思下,"无所为而为"溢出单纯的道德论域,开始阐释审美、认识等活动。20世纪20年代,受梁启超新释的影响,该说被广泛用来阐释审美和学术独立论,同时陷入意识形态论争;另外,在吴宓、傅铜等人处,"无所为而为"成为英文"disinterestedness"的对译词。20世纪30年代,朱光潜、宗白华以该说译介西方美学中的核心命题。明此流觞,可上续中国现代美学的本土学术谱系,下抵中国审美现代性之核心——审美功利主义。
[Abstract]:The interpretation of Mencius'"differentiation of righteousness and benefit" in the original Confucian theory of "doing nothing but doing nothing" evolved from Laozi's "all acts for nothing", requiring moral behavior to be derived from pure motive. By the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China, in the context of national salvation, under the introspection of the traditional moral motivation theory, "nothing to do" spilt over the pure moral field, and began to interpret aesthetics. In 20s, under the influence of Liang Qichao's new interpretation, this theory was widely used to explain aesthetic and academic independence, and at the same time fell into ideological controversy; in addition, in Wu Mi, Fu Tong et al., "doing nothing but doing nothing" becomes the translation word of "disinterestedness" in English. In 30s, Zhu Guangqian and Zong Baihua translated the core proposition in western aesthetics with this theory. The beginning of this process can be seen as a continuation of the native academic pedigree of modern Chinese aesthetics. The core of Chinese aesthetic modernity is aesthetic utilitarianism.
【作者单位】：杭州师范大学艺术教育研究院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国现代审美功利主义思想与儒家心性文化传统关系研究”(批准号:12BZW016) 浙江省社科基金项目“中国现代美学与清末儒学的思想谱系研究”(批准号:13NDJC152YB)成果
【分类号】：B83-0

【共引文献】