中国现代辞书中的“美学”——“美学”术语的译介与传播

发布时间：2018-02-27 22:41

本文关键词： 辞书美学术语译介现代学术知识体系　出处：《学术月刊》2010年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：辞书是体现一个时代知识系统最为普及和权威的载体。自19世纪中叶以来至20世纪中叶的整整一百年中,六十多部相关辞书都收录了"美学"的词条,但由于时代的不同,收录的内容、范围、角度等各不相同,由此可追溯"美学"作为一门外来学科在中国的译介和传播轨迹。它们可以分为三个时段:1912年之前;1912年至1927年;1927年至1949年。在1912年之前,"Aes-thetics"这一术语在各种辞书中有多种译法,并最终得以定名为"美学"。这一时期关于"美学"的主要知识资源来自来华的新教传教士和日本。民初的壬子—癸卯学制,基本完成了中国现代学术体系的制度化,由此与"美学"相关的知识分类、学科体系以及理论结构得以完善。在各种语文辞书和专业辞书中,收录"美学"一词的情况比较普及,对于美学理论的译介和研究也渐趋深入。1927年之后,来自苏联的马克思主义逐渐在中国发挥指导性的作用,思想和知识体系随之更新,美学理论亦受之影响,"话语"系统随之发生了改变。
[Abstract]:Dictionaries are the most popular and authoritative carrier of the knowledge system of an era. In the 100 years since the middle of 19th century to the middle of 20th century, more than 60 related dictionaries have included the entries of "aesthetics", but due to the different times, The content, scope, angle and so on are different, They can be divided into three periods: before 1912, from 1912 to 1927, from 1927 to 1927. Before 1927, the term "Aes-thetics" was translated in various dictionaries in a variety of ways, "Aesthetics" can be traced back to the course of translation and dissemination in China as a foreign subject. "Aesthetics" can be divided into three periods: before 1912, from 1912 to 1927, the term "Aes-thetics" was translated in various dictionaries. The main knowledge resources about aesthetics in this period came from the Protestant missionaries in China and Japan. In the early days of the Republic of China, the school system of Nonzi-Guimao basically completed the institutionalization of China's modern academic system. As a result, the classification of knowledge, discipline system and theoretical structure related to "aesthetics" have been perfected. In various Chinese dictionaries and professional dictionaries, the inclusion of the word "aesthetics" is quite popular. Since 1927, Marxism from the Soviet Union has gradually played a guiding role in China, and the ideology and knowledge system has been updated. Aesthetic theory is also affected, and the system of discourse has been changed.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：B83-06

【参考文献】