劳动与审美——马克思、海德格尔和杜威的劳动美学

发布时间：2018-03-15 11:34

本文选题：劳动　切入点：审美　出处：《南京社会科学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："劳动创造美"这个马克思主义美学的经典命题近年来屡遭质疑,主要理由是,劳动是物质性的和功利性的活动,而审美则是精神性的和非功利性的活动。然而这样的理由并不成立,因为劳动和审美均是历史性的概念。强调静观的非功利的美学是近代的产物,带有诸多局限,尤其是忽视审美与生活的连续性。而在马克思那里,劳动在特定历史阶段是异化的和非自由的,但在未来理想社会中,却如同艺术创造一样具有审美的特性。同时,在20世纪海德格尔和杜威也力图破除形而上学传统,并恢复审美与劳动之间的连续性关系,因而重新揭示出劳动的美学意义。他们的美学不仅对马克思的美学做出了有益补充,而且也与马克思一道指出了从美学角度革新社会的可能性和现实性。
[Abstract]:The classic proposition of "labor creates beauty" has been repeatedly questioned in recent years. The main reason is that labor is a material and utilitarian activity. While aesthetics is a spiritual and non-utilitarian activity. However, such a reason does not hold, because both labor and aesthetics are historical concepts. The non-utilitarian aesthetics that emphasizes meditation is the product of modern times and has many limitations. In particular, the continuity of aesthetics and life is ignored. In Marx's view, labor is dissimilated and non-free at a certain historical stage, but in the future ideal society, it has the same aesthetic characteristics as artistic creation. At the same time, In 20th century, Heidegger and Dewey also tried to break the metaphysical tradition and restore the continuity between aesthetics and labor, thus rediscovering the aesthetic significance of labor. It also points out the possibility and reality of innovating society from the angle of aesthetics.
【作者单位】：山西大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“西方美育思想史”(15ZDB024)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B832.5

【相似文献】