趣味与德性:康德论审美自主及其与道德的关联

发布时间：2018-04-02 01:03

本文选题：康德美学　切入点：《判断力批判》　出处：《文艺理论研究》2008年02期

【摘要】：康德究竟是一个形式主义者,还是一个道德主义者?这个问题还没有引起国内康德美学研究者的高度重视。他们多半提出,康德一会儿认为美在形式,一会儿又认为美在道德,并指出这是康德的"自相矛盾",从而将康德美学的最根本问题轻易地打发掉了。本文在欧美康德学者大量前期研究的基础上提出,康德坚定地认为美在形式,但这一命题并不必然地意味着美必须与道德问题一刀两断,因此,《判断力批判》表面上的"自相矛盾",其实暗藏着康德更为内在的动机:即在对趣味自主性的不遗余力的论证后,重新将趣味置于启蒙的更大语境。
[Abstract]:Is Kant a formalist or a moralist?This problem has not attracted the attention of domestic Kant aesthetics researchers.Most of them suggested that Kant thought beauty in form and beauty in morality, and pointed out that this was Kant's "contradiction", thus easily dismissed the most fundamental problem of Kant's aesthetics.Based on a large number of previous studies by Kant scholars in Europe and the United States, this paper points out that Kant firmly believes that beauty lies in form, but this proposition does not necessarily mean that beauty must be separated from moral problems.Therefore, the "self-contradiction" on the surface of judgment actually implies Kant's more intrinsic motive: that is, after sparing no effort to prove the autonomy of taste, he replaces it in the larger context of enlightenment.
【作者单位】：浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院
【分类号】：B83-05

【共引文献】