新世纪以来西方生活美学的内部论争及其反思

发布时间：2018-04-25 09:02

本文选题：西方生活美学 + 论争　；参考：《南京师范大学文学院学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：新世纪以来西方生活美学的内部论争主要围绕三个问题展开:一是在生活美学的研究范围上形成了以凯文·梅尔齐奥尼为代表的限定性路径与以托马斯·莱迪为代表的扩展性路径之争。二是在日常生活审美经验的生成模式上形成了以莱迪为代表的超常模式与以斋藤百合子、雪莉·欧文和阿托·哈帕拉为代表的平常模式之争。三是在艺术与生活美学的关系上形成了以斋藤百合子为代表的主张分离与以莱迪为代表的主张融合之争。对上述论争进行反思:生活美学研究范围的界定应坚持限定性与开放性的统一;超常模式与平常模式之间的连续性和互动性值得重视,并可尝试建构日常生活审美经验生成的模型;处理艺术与生活美学的关系应兼顾二者的差异和联系,并注重探讨的思路。
[Abstract]:Since the new century, the internal debates of western aesthetics of life have mainly revolved around three issues: first, the limited path represented by Kevin Melchionne and Thomas Reddy formed in the research scope of life aesthetics. Represents a dispute over extensible paths. On the other hand, the generation model of aesthetic experience in daily life has formed the supernormal pattern represented by Randy and the usual pattern represented by Saito Liliko, Shirley Irving and Atto Hapala. Third, the relationship between art and life aesthetics has formed a dispute between the separation of ideas represented by Saito Lilium seed and the integration of ideas represented by Raidi. To reflect on the above arguments: the definition of the scope of life aesthetics research should adhere to the unity of limitation and openness, the continuity and interaction between the supernormal mode and the ordinary mode should be paid more attention to. The author also tries to construct the model of aesthetic experience generation in daily life, and to deal with the relationship between art and life aesthetics, the difference and relation between them should be taken into account, and the train of thought of discussion should be paid more attention to.
【作者单位】：福州大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“晚明文人的生活美学及其当代再生产研究”(编号:16YJC751023) 2015年福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“当代西方生活美学思想研究”(编号:JAS150151)
【分类号】：B834.3

【相似文献】