“实践美学”的苏联缘起与本土变异——李泽厚“客观社会说”与苏联“社会派”美学的比较阅读

发布时间：2018-04-28 17:46

本文选题：“美学大讨论” + “客观社会说”　；参考：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年02期

【摘要】：以李泽厚为代表的“实践美学”发端于上世纪五六十年代“美学大讨论”时期所倡导的“客观社会说”,它既是在本土语境中对黄药眠“生活实践论”美学以及革命文艺传统中毛泽东“实践论”思想的继承发扬,更是在“以苏联为师”的外部语境下对“社会派”美学的话语移植。但在萌发后的理论发展走向上,却发生了偏离与变异:与苏联“社会派”美学逐渐冲破认识论防线而纵深走向价值论不同——中国“实践美学”受本土意识形态钳制始终无法摆脱认识论模式,还在“客观存在”的路线上裹足不前,这种路径偏离所致的“主体性”缺失,直至“新启蒙”语境下通过对西方美学的补接、吸纳与改造才得以弥补。这也正意味着“实践美学”除原点上受“苏联模式”渗透影响外,其理论发展与建构方向上的不同格局与本土追求。
[Abstract]:The "practical aesthetics", represented by Li Zehou, originated from the "objective social theory" advocated during the "aesthetic discussion" period in the 1950s and 1960s. It is not only the inheritance and development of Huang Yaomian's "life practice theory" aesthetics in the local context and Mao Zedong's "practice theory" thought in the revolutionary literary tradition, but also the transplantation of the "social school" aesthetics in the external context of "taking the Soviet Union as the teacher". But in the direction of theoretical development after germination, However, deviations and variations have taken place: with the Soviet "social school" aesthetics gradually breaking through the epistemological line of defense and moving in depth to the axiology, China's "practical aesthetics" has always been unable to get rid of the epistemological model under the control of local ideology. In the line of "objective existence", this kind of path deviates from the lack of "subjectivity", and only through the complement of western aesthetics in the context of "new enlightenment" can we make up for it. This also means that "practical aesthetics" is influenced by the "Soviet model" in the origin, and the different patterns and local pursuits in the direction of theoretical development and construction.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院文学研究所理论室;
【分类号】：B83

【相似文献】