谈中西文论的比较研究
发布时间：2018-09-18 11:24
【摘要】：正 近年来,中西文论的比较研究有很大进展,这对于深化中国古代文论和西方文论的研究,加强当代文艺学的建设,都具有非常重要的积极意义。这里仅就如何作比较研究谈几点看法: 一、概括性与准确性既然是比较研究,理所当然地要概括中西文论的不同特征。如果只是琐碎地罗列现象,就谈不上把握中西文论的精神实质,也可以说没有达到研究的目的。这概括必须不仅是简要的,而且是精当的。无论是中国传统文论还是西方文论,其内容都不那么单纯划一,各自内部包含着种种流派,形形色色的观点、理论,相互差异,甚至相互对立。假若不考虑到这种复杂性,其结论就难免会以偏概全。
[Abstract]:In recent years, great progress has been made in the comparative study of Chinese and Western literary theories, which is of great significance for deepening the study of ancient Chinese literary theory and western literary theory and strengthening the construction of contemporary literary theory. This paper makes a few comments on how to make a comparative study: first, since generality and accuracy are comparative studies, it is natural to generalize the different characteristics of Chinese and Western literary theories. If we only list the phenomena, we can not grasp the spiritual essence of Chinese and Western literary theories, and we can say that we have failed to achieve the purpose of the study. This generalization must be not only brief, but also accurate. Whether Chinese traditional literary theory or western literary theory, its content is not so simple and uniform, each contains a variety of schools, various views, theories, mutual differences, or even opposition to each other. If this complexity is not taken into account, its conclusions will inevitably be biased.
【作者单位】：
本文编号：2247756
[Abstract]:In recent years, great progress has been made in the comparative study of Chinese and Western literary theories, which is of great significance for deepening the study of ancient Chinese literary theory and western literary theory and strengthening the construction of contemporary literary theory. This paper makes a few comments on how to make a comparative study: first, since generality and accuracy are comparative studies, it is natural to generalize the different characteristics of Chinese and Western literary theories. If we only list the phenomena, we can not grasp the spiritual essence of Chinese and Western literary theories, and we can say that we have failed to achieve the purpose of the study. This generalization must be not only brief, but also accurate. Whether Chinese traditional literary theory or western literary theory, its content is not so simple and uniform, each contains a variety of schools, various views, theories, mutual differences, or even opposition to each other. If this complexity is not taken into account, its conclusions will inevitably be biased.
【作者单位】：
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨坚;;石涛与诺瓦利斯的“另一世界”——石涛与诺瓦利斯美学主张比较研究[J];商丘职业技术学院学报;2011年03期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 武凌;学术资源中的比较视野[N];中国教育报;2008年
2 戴永红;生态美学视野中的禅宗美学研究[N];文艺报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 胡敏;中西人体美观念及其表现形式比较研究[D];华中师范大学;2006年
2 徐迎新;二十世纪上半叶中国学人比较美学观的人类学分析[D];复旦大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 孙旭芝;托马斯·门罗东方美学思想研究[D];山东师范大学;2007年
2 翁海贞;趣味标准问题：休谟、康德之比较研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
3 杜振秋;自由与禁锢[D];山东师范大学;2009年
4 解玉斌;从否定走向乌托邦[D];贵州大学;2006年
5 唐锐;Stice身体美内化理想标准在中国文化下的适应性：民族比较研究[D];西南大学;2007年
6 陈靓;历史视角下的孔子与柏拉图美学思想比较研究[D];山东大学;2009年
7 王飞;庄子与克里希那穆提的人格美学思想比较研究[D];青海民族大学;2011年
，本文编号：2247756
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/meixuelunwen/2247756.html
