《水浒传》与《侠盗罗宾汉》叙事艺术之比较

发布时间：2018-02-26 00:28

本文关键词： 《水浒传》《侠盗罗宾汉》叙事艺术叙事时序　出处：《浙江工业大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 文章共分三大部分,第一部分是前言,主要阐述本题的选题意义、研究现状及研究方法。第二部分是正文,共五章。第一章从叙事时序与叙事时距层面对两书的叙事时间进行阐述。《水浒传》与《侠盗罗宾汉》中都使用了顺叙与补叙的方式,《水浒传》中还有大量的插叙与预叙,这与我国的宗教传统有关。而《侠盗罗宾汉》则不然,由于受西方叙事传统影响,没有使用预叙,并用大量的补叙代替插叙。第二章比较两书的叙述结构与叙述视角。《水浒传》结构复杂,属于缀段式与单体式的结合。《侠盗罗宾汉》结构简单,属于典型的单体式结构。《水浒传》与《侠盗罗宾汉》都是全知视角与限知视角并用。前者人物众多,头绪繁杂,受我国章回小说传统与说书艺术的影响,叙述者以全知视角为主,局部使用限知视角;后者故事线索单一,主要围绕罗宾汉展开,叙述者以限知视角为主,把一些叙述任务交给罗宾汉,有限地使用全知视角。第三章从叙述方式及人物描绘方面对两部作品进行比较研究。《水浒传》与《侠盗罗宾汉》都属于展示与讲述相结合。前者由于历史因素等的影响,采用了讲述为主,辅之以展示的叙述方式;后者则是以展示为主,辅之以讲述。第四章阐释两部小说的叙事伦理异同。梁山好汉中有很多是江湖中人,他们做出了许多有悖于传统伦理道德的事,叙事者对这些行为并没有提出批评,表明叙述者逾越了道德底线;《侠盗罗宾汉》中主人公则十分注重道德问题,体现了小说叙述者对道德伦理情怀的关注。第五章对两书的叙事比较结果进行更深层次的论析。两部作品来自于不同的民族,文化传统的不同使两部作品呈现出不同的美学特征。文章的第三部分为总结,主要是对本论题的结论进行概括、反思和展望。
[Abstract]:The article is divided into three parts, the first part is the preface, mainly describes the significance of this topic, research status and research methods. The second part is the text. There are five chapters. The first chapter expounds the narrative time of the two books from the narrative time sequence and the narrative time interval. Both the Water margin and Robin Hood use the way of suiting and rewriting, and there are a lot of narration and prenarration in Water margin. This has something to do with the religious traditions of our country. But Robin Hood is not. Because of the influence of the Western narrative tradition, there is no use of prenarration. In the second chapter, the narrative structure and narrative angle of the two books are compared. The structure of "Water margin" is complex, which belongs to the combination of piecewise and mono-style. The structure of Robin Hood is simple. "Water margin" and "Rogue Robin Hood" are the combination of omniscience and limited knowledge. The former has many characters and complicated ideas, which is influenced by the tradition of Chinese Zhanghui novel and the art of storytelling. The narrator is mainly from a omniscient perspective, with a limited knowledge perspective; the latter has a single story clue, which mainly revolves around Robin Hood, and the narrator gives Robin Hood some narrative tasks mainly from a restricted knowledge perspective. The third chapter makes a comparative study of the two works from the aspects of narrative style and character description. Both Water margin and Robin Hood belong to the combination of display and narration. The former is influenced by historical factors. The latter is mainly about display and supplemented by narration. Chapter 4th explains the similarities and differences of narrative ethics between the two novels. Many of Liang Shan's heroes are from rivers and lakes. They do many things that are contrary to traditional ethics, and the narrator does not criticize them, indicating that the narrator has crossed the moral line; the protagonist in Robin Hood pays great attention to moral issues. It reflects the attention of the narrator of the novel to the moral and ethical feelings. Chapter 5th makes a deeper analysis of the results of the narrative comparison between the two books. The two works come from different nationalities. The difference of cultural tradition makes the two works show different aesthetic characteristics. The third part of the article is a summary, mainly to the conclusion of this topic, reflection and prospects.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：I0-03;I106

【共引文献】