近30年“文艺美学”研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 17:21

本文选题：文艺美学　切入点：文艺学　出处：《西南大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： “文艺美学”是近30年来颇具争议的有中国特色的学术范畴。从1980年胡经之先生提出建立文艺美学以来,许多学者都在为文艺美学成为一门独立的学科而努力。经过近30年的研究,文艺美学已取得了一定的学术成就,但是,它能否真正成为一门独立学科还有质疑之声。在近30年中,文艺美学一直被其定位、研究对象、研究方法等主要问题所纠缠,与文艺学、美学的研究界线也相当模糊。因此,文艺美学的学科合理性一直遭到人们的质疑,而“文艺美学”这一术语也常被学者模糊地使用。在这种状况下,本文试图依据不同的学术观点来理清30年文艺美学研究的发展脉络,对此进行回顾与反思。全文主要分三章和结语。第一章概述了文艺美学的产生及其发展现状。文艺美学的产生有其时代原因和内在学理原因。在建国后的一段特定时期内,文艺一度成为政治的奴婢和附庸,失去了自身的学术独立性。20世纪80年代出现的思想解放潮流为学术界提供了一个自由的空间,让文艺研究逐步回归到审美之维,从而催生了文艺美学的诞生。文艺研究“由内向外”的自律性是文艺美学产生的内在原因。另外,还通过对30年来文艺美学的研究论文和著作以及现实际遇的分析阐述了文艺美学的发展现状。第二章对文艺美学概念、对象、方法的论争进行了分析。文艺美学的概念一直存在争论,在1980年至1999年之间学界对文艺美学概念的观点主要依附于其它学科,处于“寄居”的地位。进入新世纪这种研究倾向发生了转变,主流观点认为文艺美学可以独立于其它学科而存在。在文艺美学研究的对象论争部分,主要通过几种典型的意见和英语翻译中的论争来阐释其研究对象的问题。目前,其研究对象主要有以下几种观点:研究文学艺术的审美经验、艺术与现实的审美关系、文学艺术的审美特征和审美规律,艺术与艺术活动的审美特征和独特的审美规律。此外文艺美学的英语翻译也存在争论,从它的翻译也可以看出研究对象的理解差异。在文艺美学方法的论争上,主要通过学者对方法的论争来展现,分析发现主要以吸收融合各门人文学科和自然科学的方法形成一个综合的方法体系为主。第三章阐释了学科归属的纠葛与研究的得失。学科归属的纠葛主要是它与文艺学、美学问的学科归属问题。本文主要从理论话语和现实研究两个层面对此进行了论述。文艺美学30来的研究,其所得在于摒弃了文艺理论认识论和美学的思辨模式,从对美的本质的形而上探讨转向了对具体的文学艺术研究,强调从非意识形态角度来研究文艺作品,促进我国文艺研究的发展。而其所失,却在于文艺美学的研究偏离了它的理论初衷,模糊了与文艺学、美学的研究边界,研究泛化的现象严重。另外,在强调从审美的角度来研究文艺的同时也在着意忽略文艺的意识形态属性。本文通过以上的分析得出结语,认为文艺美学不但离成为一门独立学科尚远,还出现了“悬空”的现象,有待对它进行更进一步的研究。
[Abstract]:"Literary Aesthetics" is the academic field in recent 30 years are controversial Chinese characteristics. Since 1980, Mr. Hu proposed the establishment of literary aesthetics, many scholars in literary aesthetics became an independent discipline and effort. After nearly 30 years of research, literary aesthetics has made some academic achievements, but it can truly become an independent discipline and questioning voice. In the past 30 years, literary aesthetics has been its orientation, research object, research methods and main problems of entanglement, and art, aesthetics research boundaries is quite fuzzy. Because of this, aesthetic subject rationality has been questioned, and the term "Literary Aesthetics" is often vague. Scholars in this situation, this paper attempts to development according to different academic point of view to clarify the aesthetics of art for 30 years, this review and reflection.
This thesis consists of three chapters and the conclusion. The first chapter outlines the origin and current situation of the development of literary aesthetics. Literary aesthetics has its intrinsic causes of the era and the theoretical reasons. In a specific period of time after the founding of new China, the political became a slave and vassal, lost their own academic independence in 80s.20 the trend of ideological emancipation provides a free space for academic research, let art gradually return to the aesthetic dimension, which gave birth to the aesthetics of literature and art. Art research "self-discipline inside out" is the inherent reason of the emergence of literary aesthetics. In addition, through the analysis of research papers and works of literary aesthetics 30 years of experience and reality describes the development status of literary aesthetics.
The second chapter on the literary aesthetics concept, object, method arguments are analyzed. The concept of literary aesthetics has been controversial, between 1980 and 1999 scholars on the literary aesthetics concept mainly dependent on other subjects, in the "alien" status. This kind of research into the tendency of the new century has changed, the mainstream view literary aesthetics can be independent from other subjects. In the part of object debate of the literary and aesthetic studies, explains the research object mainly through the dispute opinions and several typical in English translation. At present, the research object mainly has the following several points: the aesthetic experience of literature and art, the aesthetic relationship between art and reality the aesthetic feature of literature and art, and aesthetic law, aesthetic characteristics and artistic activities and unique aesthetic rules. In literary aesthetics English translation also exists in the debate, It can be seen from the translation research object. To understand the difference in the debate on the methods of literary aesthetics, mainly by scholars to show the debate on methods, analysis mainly to absorb the fusion of different humanities and natural science methods to form a comprehensive system for the Lord.
The third chapter explains the research subject of ownership disputes and losses. It is mainly attributable to the subject of disputes and art, aesthetic subject belonging of ask. This article mainly from two aspects of theory and reality of this are discussed. The aesthetic studies of 30 years, the income in abandon the thinking model of epistemology the study of literary theory and aesthetics, turn to the study of literature and art from the specific nature of beauty of the metaphysical, emphasize to study literary works from the perspective of non ideological, and promote the development of art in China. And the lost, but lies in the study of art aesthetics theory deviates from the original intention of it, and the fuzzy study on boundary aesthetics, study the generalization of the phenomenon is serious. In addition, emphasized to study literature from the perspective of aesthetic at the same time to ignore the ideology attribute of literature.
Based on the above analysis, we conclude that aesthetics of literature and art is not only an independent discipline but also a phenomenon of "hanging up", which needs further research.

【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：I01

【相似文献】