西方文论关键词:地方

发布时间：2018-03-12 19:10

  本文选题：地方　切入点：地方转向　出处：《外国文学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为重要的跨学科关键词,"地方"的历史悠久。开端于古希腊哲学,"地方"批评在20世纪以来呈现出多元化的发展态势。现象学派、人文地理学家以及部分生态学家主张将"地方"看作带给人地方感、具有明显边界和稳定特征的固定场所;然而,马克思主义社会建构论者与后现代批评家们认为"流动的地方"早已取代"固定的地方"成为现代社会的发展趋势。他们认为"固定的地方"概念过于保守,具有浓烈的排斥他者的动机,主张在"时空压缩"的现代社会中,具有混杂身份的人们应该不受约束地以"迁移式的"形式去适应"流动的地方"。"固定的地方"面临现代社会变革的冲击,而"流动的地方"也极易沦为资本主义追逐价值的工具。更严重的是,"流动的地方"会成为霸权地方政策威胁他者"阶级""民族"甚至是"国家"边界的借口。由此可知,"地方"在现代社会背景下并不只是地理学的范畴,也不限于生态批评的领域,而是涉及政治纲领、民族处境以及经济行为的混合体。
[Abstract]:As an important interdisciplinary key word, "place" has a long history. It began in ancient Greek philosophy. Since 20th century, "local" criticism has shown a pluralistic development trend. Humanistic geographers and some ecologists advocate "place" as a fixed place that gives people a sense of place, with distinct boundaries and stable characteristics; however, Marxist social constructionists and postmodern critics believe that "floating place" has long replaced "fixed place" as the development trend of modern society. They think that the concept of "fixed place" is too conservative. Having strong motives for excluding others, advocating in a modern society of "space-time compression", People with mixed identities should adapt to "flowing places" in the form of "migration" unrestrained. "fixed places" face the impact of modern social change. What is more, "flowing place" will become an excuse for hegemonic local policy to threaten the "class", "nation" and even "state" of the hegemonic local policy. From this we can see that "place" is not just a geographical category in the context of modern society. Nor is it confined to the realm of ecological criticism, but a mixture of political platforms, ethnic situations and economic behaviour.
【作者单位】： 首都师范大学大学英语教研部;北京外国语大学英语学院;
【分类号】：I0
，

本文编号：1602916