社会学视野下的新时期文艺学知识生产

发布时间：2018-03-24 06:21

本文选题：社会学　切入点：新时期　出处：《陕西师范大学》2010年博士论文

【摘要】： 当下的文艺学学科正处于反思和重构的语境中,文艺学合法性危机和话语重构热潮,本质关乎其知识生产。文艺学已不是“话语”问题,而是其作为人文学科知识的社会生产问题、作为“象征形式的社会存在”的哲学解释问题。就此而言,中国文艺学作为人文学科的分支,在历经几十年发展之后需要重估其自主性；作为一种象征形式的社会存在,需要在新的社会文化语境下阐释其存在的合理性；作为一种意识形态的符号文化的“生产方式”,既需要在理性的反思中恢复文学精神的原生态,也需要在现实语境中为其重新定位。而针对文学理论与文学批评、大学教学的“生产-传播-接受”链条的脱节,研究主体自身与本学科思想史的断裂以及其在社会行动中的角色困境等现实状况,需要强化主体的观念认同：学科自身必须在重构中才能持续发展,文艺学学人必须“在自识中走向世界”。基于此一学科发展的社会文化背景和内在价值取向的思考,提出在社会学视野下观照文艺学知识生产问题的主张。而应用社会学理论范式反思性研究中国文艺学知识生产范畴的学理逻辑性,在于新时期中国的文学场域、知识场域具有总体的“关系性结构”和内在的社会动力学特征,更具有本土知识生产传统的特殊文化“习性”特征。论文第一章指出,在社会结构深层变革、文化呈现多样性的语境中,本学科要突破发展困境、获得新的适应性,既需要全面“自诊”,解构以往学科知识预设的“确定性”,通过梳理自身的知识形态和话语实践而作出深入的、持续的反思性研究,同时也需要采用“介入”疗法,针对学科危机的本源问题——新时期文艺学学科的知识生产状况,借助反思社会学、知识社会学、科学社会学的多重研究范式来提供全新的视野。作为一种综合性的知识反思理路,其根本价值指向是析清知识主体在历史化、地方化语境中建构知识生产的特殊行动的社会学意义,对本学科知识系统和生产路径的因果循环关系作出新的阐释。要在“象征形式”的深度阐释和科学主体的“反观性实践”中界定、阐释学科知识生产。第二章论述了新时期中国文艺学的知识生产与知识形态的生成有着深刻的辩证关系。针对新时期文艺学学科知识形态和知识生产的逻辑线索,进行了总体性的观照、提炼和界说,力求跨越“史述”的线性叙事而走向“现代性话语结构的技术性分析”,通过学科谱系和话语模式分析,观照历史逻辑下的新时期文艺学“发生着怎样的形态变迁,到底是什么状态”。第三章主要从反思社会学和科学、知识社会学的多重学理逻辑中剖析文艺学学科的知识生产状况,重点解释历史化、地方化形成的新时期文艺学场域的特殊知识生产机制以及主体的精神生产机制,以此引导主体反思并揭示学科自主化进程中“研究者的集体无意识”规律。在此基础上,第四章提出,要深刻理解和洞察文艺学的当代知识形态和知识生产的整体结构和内在价值规律,通过辨识社会文化再生产与文艺学学科发展的内在关联性、确认中国式生产路径及其实用理性的“合法性”,为文艺学突破符号生产的价值困境、明确并把握知识生产的社会学特征,进而促进今后的学科发展提供新的参照。文章第五章申明,通过将文艺学知识生产问题纳入社会学视野,要重审现代性和后现代性交汇的历史语境下的学科个性。对于作为人文学科象征性阐释者和文学智识实践参与者的知识分子而言,当下迫切需要打破“专业态度”的局限,回归使命意识,重树文艺学的知识信仰,以“历史的美学建构和现实的感性书写”为己任,在智识化实践中走向主体精神的新境界。本文遵从“社会学的理论逻辑”,重视将“一般性的理论论证”与“具体化的经验叙说”相结合,旨在通过一次跨学科研究的探索,将中国文艺学的审美意识形态属性和场域化生产特性凸显出来,提掘其文艺美学的知识本体、诗性智慧特征和实践理性的本土文化精神,论证出新时期文艺学知识生产的价值追求所呈现于当代语境中的动力机制和行动意义。
[Abstract]:The current literary discipline is in reflection and reconstruction in the context of legitimacy crisis and the reconstruction of discourse upsurge of literature and art, nature concerns its knowledge production. Art is not "Discourse", but as the problem of humanities knowledge of social production, as a "symbolic form of social existence" philosophical explanation of the problem. With regard to China, literature and art as a branch of the humanities, after several decades of development need to reassess its autonomy; as a symbolic form of social needs, in the new social and cultural context to explain the rationality of its existence; as a symbol of cultural ideology "mode of production", not only need the original ecology recovery of literary spirit in the rational reflection, also needs in the context of reality for its re positioning. According to the literary theory and literary criticism, the university teaching of "production - transmission - "The chain line, the research main body and breaking the discipline's thinking history and its role difficulty in social action and other realities, to strengthen the main concept of identity: discipline must in the reconstruction to sustainable development, people must learn" from self-awareness to the world of literature and art. This is a reflection of the development of the subject of the social and cultural background and the intrinsic value orientation based on the proposed huminology approach literary knowledge production in the view of sociology. Advocate the application of the sociological theory paradigm of reflective research category of literary knowledge production Chinese theoretical logic, in the new period literature field China, knowledge field with the overall relationship between "structure" and the intrinsic social dynamics, the special culture of "habit" has the characteristics of traditional local knowledge production.
The first chapter points out that, in the profound changes in social structure, cultural diversity in the context of this discipline to break the development dilemma, obtain new adaptability, both need a comprehensive "diagnosis", the deconstruction of subject knowledge Presupposition "certainty", through the form of knowledge and discourse practice to sort out their own in-depth research, reflection persistent, also need to adopt intervention therapy, for the source problem subject crisis -- science literature and art in new era of knowledge production, with the help of reflective sociology, sociology of knowledge, multiple research paradigm of Sociology of science to provide a new perspective. As a kind of comprehensive knowledge reconsideration approach, the fundamental value is to analyze the body of knowledge in the history of the Qing Dynasty, the special action of knowledge production in the context of the construction of local social significance, cause and effect on the subject knowledge system and production cycle path A new interpretation of the ring relationship is made. It is to be defined in the deep interpretation of the "symbolic form" and the "reflective practice" of the subject of science to explain the production of subject knowledge.
The second chapter discusses the formation of the new period China literary knowledge production and knowledge form the profound dialectical relations between the new period. According to the logic clue of subject knowledge and knowledge production of the literature, the overall perspective, refining and definition, and strive to leap in the history of the linear narrative "to" analysis "the technical structure of the modern words, the subject of lineage and mode of discourse analysis, the new period of history observation under the logic of literature and art" happening form changes how, what is the state ".
The third chapter mainly from the reflection of the sociology of science and sociology of knowledge, the multiple analysis in production of knowledge of literature science logic, focus on the interpretation of history, the place of formation of the spirit of the production mechanism of the new period special domain knowledge production mechanism and main body of literature and art, in order to guide the main reflection and reveal the subject of autonomy in the process of the rule of the "collective unconsciousness.
On this basis, the fourth chapter puts forward the overall structure, to contemporary form of knowledge and knowledge production the profound understanding and insight into the literature and the inherent law of value, the intrinsic relationship of subject development social and cultural reproduction and identification of literature, confirm the China production path and its practical rationality and legitimacy, to break the plight of symbolic value the production of literature and art, and clearly grasp the learning characteristics of knowledge production of society, and promote the future development to provide new reference.
The fifth chapter affirms that the literary knowledge production to the view of sociology, to review the modernity and the intersection of modern historical context. As for the humanities subject personality symbolic interpretation of intellectual and literary practice participants intellectuals, urgent to break the "professional attitude" limitation, regression the sense of mission, heavy tree literary knowledge belief, with "perceptual writing" history of aesthetics and the reality of the mission in the new realm of intellectual subjectivity spirit in practice.
In this paper, to comply with the "theoretical logic of sociology", "pay more attention to the general theoretical argument" and "specific narrative experience" combined to explore through an interdisciplinary research, the Chinese literary aesthetic ideology attribute and field production characteristics highlighted, dig its literary aesthetic ontology. The poetic wisdom features and practical rational spirit of local culture, demonstrates the dynamic mechanism and action meaning in the new period the value pursuit of knowledge production of literature and art in the contemporary context.

【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：I0-05

【引证文献】