当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

不停歇的驱力—尼采权力意志于艺术中的体现与价值浅析

发布时间:2018-06-27 00:33

  本文选题:权力意志 + 赋形 ; 参考:《西安美术学院》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:“权力意志”这一哲学概念是在尼采较晚时期提出来的,他把追求力量的强大、追求优势当做生命意志的本质特征,并对之予以肯定。权力意志的“力”并非单单指物理学中的力,而是世界内在的一种基本驱力或创造力,是自发式的和循环式的。在尼采的论述中,世界是一个逐渐生成、不断推陈出新的世界,而权力意志可以被用来当做一切关于生长、扩张、独立行为的阐释者,如动植物微生物的生长、人的身体机能循环、人类的文化现象等等。艺术作为人类的文化现象之一也不可避免地体现着权力意志的运行规律,权力意志之求差异、求变化、求强大的根本特性以永不停歇之势存在于艺术中。本文围绕四个主要部分来阐述:第一部分,从自然生物、人群、文化的层面对其含义做了尝试性的针对解释,并提出与艺术的关系;第二部分,从艺术史(西方20世纪艺术史)、艺术家(毕加索、杜尚、贝克曼)、艺术作品(吕佩尔茨作品)三个角度来阐述权力意志体现在艺术中的外化形态。20世纪艺术史作为外化形态之一,其发展过程又从三个阶段体现了权力意志自身的变化过程,如世纪初的原始主义回归(循环过程),艺术风格的多元化(分解过程),艺术形式皆趋于抽象、艺术表现内容皆趋于日常、艺术门类皆淡化界限等(凝结过程);第三部分,由第二部分的阐述可得出权力意志显现的基本特性对艺术创作所具备的方法论价值,如:求差异性是促使艺术自身实现多元与丰富的巨大驱动力;循环性与统一性要求艺术在创造过程中,仍需不断从过去找寻线索,并呈现出自己的清晰脉络;而权力意志本质上所追求的“强权感”即“力度”,在某一层面上则成为了艺术又一独特的判断标准。第四部分,藉于中国85至90年代的艺术发展在一定程度上是直接借鉴于西方20世纪现代主义,因此,与之有着看似极为相像而本质上却大不相同的特点,最为明显的不同便是中国这一阶段艺术存在着“内在逻辑性”和“脉络性”的缺乏。因此,结合第三章权力意志对于艺术创作的运用价值,其体现在西方20世纪艺术史中的“回归性”、“循环性”等或许同样适用于中国艺术的现状,也就是说,“从过去的文化中找寻线索和脉络”,并且在当代艺术的语境下,让已成为历史的传统重新衍生出新的意义。
[Abstract]:The concept of "power will" was put forward in the late period of Nietzsche. He regarded the strength of power as the essential feature of the will of life and affirmed it. The "force" of the will of power is not only the force in physics, but also a basic drive or creativity within the world. Circular. In Nietzsche's argument, the world is a gradually generated, constantly emerging world, and the will of power can be used as an interpreter of all growth, expansion, and independent behavior, such as the growth of animals and plants, the circulation of human body function, the cultural phenomenon of human beings, etc.. Art is the cultural phenomenon of human beings. One also inevitably embodies the running law of the will of power, the difference in the power will, the change, and the fundamental characteristic of the power to exist in the art. This article focuses on four main parts: the first part, a tentative explanation of its meaning from the aspects of natural biology, crowd and culture. The relationship between art and art; the second part, from the art history (Western art history of twentieth Century), the artist (Picasso, Duchamp, Backman), the works of Art (Lui Pelz's works), to explain the externalization of the power will embodied in the art, one of the.20 century art history as an externalized form, and the process of its development embodies the right from the three stages. The process of the change of willpower itself, such as the return of primidial doctrine (cycle process) at the beginning of the century, the pluralism of artistic style (the process of decomposition), the artistic forms tend to be abstract, the artistic expression tends to be daily, the art categories are all desalination of the boundary and so on (the process of condensation); the third part, from the second part, can draw the basic of the manifestation of the power of power. Characteristics of the artistic creation of the methodological value, such as: seeking difference is to promote the art itself to achieve a multidimensional and rich driving force; the cycle and unity require art in the process of creation, still need to find clues from the past, and show their own clear veins; and the essence of power will be the pursuit of the "strong sense of power". "Strength", at some level, becomes a unique standard of judgment. In the fourth part, the artistic development of China from 85 to 90s is, to a certain extent, directly borrowed from the western modernism of the West in the West. Therefore, it has a seemingly very similar and essentially different characteristics, which is the most obvious difference. There is a lack of "internal logic" and "choroid" in this stage of China's art. Therefore, combining the value of the third chapters of the will of power to artistic creation, it is reflected in the "regressive" in the western art history of the twentieth Century, and the "recycling" may also be applicable to the state of Chinese art, that is, "from the past. In the context of contemporary art, it has made new historical significance.
【学位授予单位】:西安美术学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:J110.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孙周兴;;尼采的科学批判——兼论尼采的现象学[J];世界哲学;2016年02期

2 黄梅;;对话“新表现主义”之后[J];世界美术;2013年02期

3 冯学勤;;权力意志:撤离本体论位置[J];文艺理论研究;2013年03期

4 贾海涛;;尼采权力意志的本质与影响[J];岭南学刊;2012年02期

5 段建军;彭智;;陶醉:作为生命体验的最高境界——尼采权力意志美学研究[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期

6 郑远景;;新表现主义绘画的情感世界感言[J];大众文艺;2010年02期

7 汪民安;;权力意志:战争、释放和美学[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期

8 王玉峰;;再析尼采的“权力意志”学说[J];求是学刊;2007年05期

9 杨茂明;;尼采的“权力意志论”辨析[J];安徽大学学报;2006年03期

10 汪顺宁;权力意志与艺术——论尼采美学的基本问题[J];哲学研究;2002年04期



本文编号:2072001

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2072001.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ff7f4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com