我的文学观
发布时间：2018-12-25 19:52
【摘要】：正无论在任何时代,文学尤其是诗歌都应该指向对语言和内心以及精神场域的负责,而非违心创作和言不由衷地表达。真诚写作是产生优秀作家的一个基本前提,对于批评家来说也是如此。而真诚,既是对修辞和语言能力的考验,也是对精神难度和问题意识的要求。具体到诗歌之"真",既应该是"诗性的"又应该是"历史性"的,是"美学"和"见证"的互补。这不仅与个人化的历史想象力和生命意志有关,而且也与修辞能力带来的深度"可信感"有关。这种"真诚""真""可信"也许能够纠正乔治·斯坦纳悲观的说法"文学批评往往是短命的"。
[Abstract]:No matter at any time, literature, especially poetry, should be directed to the responsibility of language, heart and spiritual field, rather than unintentional creation and insincere expression. Sincere writing is a basic prerequisite for the generation of good writers, as is true for critics. Sincerity is not only the test of rhetoric and language ability, but also the requirement of spiritual difficulty and problem consciousness. The "truth" of poetry should be "poetic" and "historic", and complement "aesthetics" and "witness". This is not only related to personal historical imagination and life will, but also to the depth of "credibility" brought by rhetorical ability. This truthfulness, truthfulness may correct George Steiner's pessimism that literary criticism is often short-lived.
【分类号】：I06
本文编号：2391563
[Abstract]:No matter at any time, literature, especially poetry, should be directed to the responsibility of language, heart and spiritual field, rather than unintentional creation and insincere expression. Sincere writing is a basic prerequisite for the generation of good writers, as is true for critics. Sincerity is not only the test of rhetoric and language ability, but also the requirement of spiritual difficulty and problem consciousness. The "truth" of poetry should be "poetic" and "historic", and complement "aesthetics" and "witness". This is not only related to personal historical imagination and life will, but also to the depth of "credibility" brought by rhetorical ability. This truthfulness, truthfulness may correct George Steiner's pessimism that literary criticism is often short-lived.
【分类号】：I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 苏中杰;语言与人格[J];阅读与写作;1997年03期
2 孙有康;;写作能力略谈[J];写作;1998年11期
3 唐丽丽;;从斯坦纳阐释翻译理论看《别雅典女郎》的汉译[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
4 曹姗姗;;从斯坦纳的翻译四步骤看杨宪益译《桃花源记》[J];文学教育(上);2011年07期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 杨玉琴;乔治·斯坦纳文学批评研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
2 刘小玉;“语言哲学”之可能性—乔治·斯坦纳语言思想研究[D];华中师范大学;2016年
3 孙倩;斯坦纳文艺思想评述[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2013年
4 于明达;从斯坦纳的阐释翻译学角度分析李清照词的英译[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2011年
5 李青;从斯坦纳阐释翻译理论看文学翻译中译者的主体性[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
6 刘星;乔治·斯坦纳阐释运作理论的应用研究[D];山西师范大学;2014年
，本文编号：2391563
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2391563.html
