“意图”之殇与作者之“向死而生”
发布时间：2019-04-30 07:57
【摘要】：张江先生提出"‘意图’在不在场"的疑问有显著的现实意义。"作者之死"或"意图谬误"的一套学说,有其现代理论发生发展的背景,是20世纪人文学科大背景变迁的产物,也是文学理论批评转向的内在需要。作为一种现代主义思潮,它既有时代的必然性,又有其偏颇。实际上,即使是最激进的文本论者,如德曼和德里达,在他们讨论文本时,也要与作者发生不解之缘。批评活动终究是通过解释作品来完成对作家或诗人的文学史或思想史的定位,通过阐发作家或诗人建立起一种思想或理念。即使再难理解和把握的作家(诗人),批评家也在所不惜通过支离破碎的文本去建立完整的作家(诗人)形象。1990年代以后的中国文学确实在思想高扬方面遇到困境,今天重振中国文学的思想力量乃是批评的责任,这也确实需要文学批评通过作品文本去阐发作家(诗人)的思想,如此,文学理论和批评重新重视"作者意图"就成为一项有意义的互动创作。
[Abstract]:Mr. Zhang Jiang's question of whether 'intention' is present is of great practical significance. The death of the author "or" the fallacy of intention "has the background of the development of the modern theory, which is the product of the great background change of the humanities in the 20th century, and is also the internal need of the turn of literary theory criticism. As a modernist trend of thought, it not only has the inevitability of the times, but also has its bias. In fact, even the most radical text theorists, such as Derman and Derrida, are inextricably close to the author when they discuss the text. After all, the critical activity is to define the literary history or ideological history of the writer or poet by interpreting the works, and to establish a kind of thought or idea by explaining the writer or poet. Even writers (poets) who are difficult to understand and grasp, critics do not hesitate to build a complete image of writers (poets) through fragmented texts. Chinese literature after the 1990s has indeed encountered difficulties in raising its minds. It is the responsibility of criticism to reinvigorate the ideological strength of Chinese literature today, which really requires literary criticism to explain the thoughts of writers (poets) through the texts of their works. Literary theory and criticism re-attach importance to the author's intention to become a meaningful interactive creation.
【作者单位】： 北京大学中文系;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学重大委托项目(10JZDW005)
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2468618
[Abstract]:Mr. Zhang Jiang's question of whether 'intention' is present is of great practical significance. The death of the author "or" the fallacy of intention "has the background of the development of the modern theory, which is the product of the great background change of the humanities in the 20th century, and is also the internal need of the turn of literary theory criticism. As a modernist trend of thought, it not only has the inevitability of the times, but also has its bias. In fact, even the most radical text theorists, such as Derman and Derrida, are inextricably close to the author when they discuss the text. After all, the critical activity is to define the literary history or ideological history of the writer or poet by interpreting the works, and to establish a kind of thought or idea by explaining the writer or poet. Even writers (poets) who are difficult to understand and grasp, critics do not hesitate to build a complete image of writers (poets) through fragmented texts. Chinese literature after the 1990s has indeed encountered difficulties in raising its minds. It is the responsibility of criticism to reinvigorate the ideological strength of Chinese literature today, which really requires literary criticism to explain the thoughts of writers (poets) through the texts of their works. Literary theory and criticism re-attach importance to the author's intention to become a meaningful interactive creation.
【作者单位】： 北京大学中文系;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学重大委托项目(10JZDW005)
【分类号】：I0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李林;;谈新批评主义者如何运用语言学解读诗歌[J];边疆经济与文化;2008年09期
2 王敏;;解构主义文学批评与新批评之关系研究[J];贵州师范学院学报;2010年07期
3 刘宗衍;;新批评主义和解构主义的差异[J];科技创新导报;2008年28期
4 张琦;;“科学”还是“信仰”?——从新批评到德里达[J];当代外国文学;2009年02期
5 石坚;王欣;张劲松;;文化语境中的凯恩斯主义和新批评[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年09期
6 杨松;;新批评简要回顾[J];中国教师;2009年S1期
7 罗益民;;新批评的诗歌翻译方法论[J];英语研究;2009年04期
8 王进;;试论形式主义与新批评学派的当代性渊源[J];四川职业技术学院学报;2006年02期
9 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2468618
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2468618.html
