从后现代到别现代

发布时间：2019-07-03 16:30

【摘要】：本文回应了王建疆教授提出的"别现代主义"理论,并以此批驳了西方艺术评论界对中国当代艺术的成见。后现代根植于西方思维框架,因而无法准确地描述中国多重历史维度混杂的现状。安迪·沃霍尔与中国当代艺术作品虽有相似的外观,但却指向迥然不同的意义。前者通过将情感从图像中剥离,构建出创作者与其表现主题的间距;后者则通过对既往艺术风格的反讽式运用,展现出前现代、现代与后现代同处共时空间的别现代特质。因此,必须借助一种能够厘清中西差异的理论方法,以区划出形成中国当代艺术作品"别现代"特质的复杂历史层级。中国学者应当致力于开掘这一理路,以促使西方评论界更好地了解中国当代艺术。在当下学术语境中,我们需要正视中西思想观念的差异性,认真聆听来自中国的理论声音,注重来自中国本土的主义。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author has responded to the "don't be modernism" theory put forward by professor Wang Jianjiang, and the prejudice of the western art criticism to the Chinese contemporary art has been refuted. The post-modern is rooted in the western thought frame, so it is not possible to accurately describe the mixed current situation of multiple historical dimensions in China. Andy Warhol has a similar appearance to Chinese contemporary art works, but it points to a very different meaning. The former, by peeling the emotion from the image, constructs the distance between the author and its performance theme; the latter, through the use of the irony of the prior art style, shows the modern, modern and post-modern features of the modern and post-modern co-operation space. Therefore, by means of a theoretical method that can clear the difference between the Chinese and the western, the complex historical level that forms the "don't be modern" of Chinese contemporary art works must be divided. Chinese scholars should work on the way to make the western critics better understand Chinese contemporary art. In the present academic context, we need to look at the differences of the Chinese and Western ideas, and listen carefully to the theoretical sound from China, and to focus on the theory from the local level of China.
【作者单位】：美国佐治亚州西南州立大学艺术系;美国中国别现代研究中心;上海大学文学院;
【分类号】：I0

【相似文献】