与莫言获诺贝尔文学奖相关的几个问题

发布时间：2018-03-08 16:29

  本文选题：莫言　切入点：诺贝尔文学奖　出处：《文艺争鸣》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正笔者向韩民族新闻社发去对莫言文学世界的简介是在2012年度诺贝尔文学奖获奖者名单公布27分钟后。之所以能如此迅速地发出稿件,是受益于崔在凤记者的先见之明,事先准备好了内容。幸运的是笔者的文字似乎与稍后看到的瑞典文学院发表的内容出入不大。由于发现不同新闻社所使用的措辞略有差异,因此感到在措辞差异的背后存在着某种内容上的可疑之处,于是便直接访问了诺贝尔奖官网,查看了一下英文原文的相关内容,找到了发生这种情况的原因。但是这次查看却使笔者觉得瑞典文学院发表的英文原文本身也有令人困惑之处,为什么会有这种感觉呢?是笔者此前的相关知识和认识有
[Abstract]:A brief introduction to Mo Yan's literary world was sent by the author to the Korean National News Service 27 minutes after the publication of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature list. The reason why the manuscript was sent so quickly was because of Cui Zaifeng's foresight. The content was prepared beforehand. Fortunately, the author's words did not seem to differ much from those published by the Swedish Academy of Letters later. As a result of the slight differences found in the language used by different news agencies, So I felt that there was something suspicious behind the differences in wording, so I went directly to the Nobel Prize website and looked at the relevant contents of the original English text. I have found out why this happened. But this time I find that the original text published by the Swedish Academy of Letters has its own puzzles. Why does it feel like this? Is the author's previous relevant knowledge and understanding of
【作者单位】： 韩国首尔大学中文系;山东师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I106
，

本文编号：1584684