《俄狄浦斯王》的符号学解读
发布时间：2018-08-25 19:25
【摘要】：俄狄浦斯故事流传到今天,己经被人们赋予了太多的含义和象征。从古希腊神话忒拜家族中的俄狄浦斯,到古希腊悲剧中的俄狄浦斯王,再到今天的围绕俄狄浦斯情结的各种论争,俄狄浦斯形象的流变形式和呈现方式是符号化的。 从诞生之初到今天的演变发展,总的说来,俄狄浦斯的演进方式可以概括为一种符号化的过程。这个过程又大致可以分为三个阶段,即形成伊始的古希腊神话,发展到后来的经典文学形象,再到今天恋母情结的代名词,在某一程度上成为专属名词。俄狄浦斯的身影逐渐清晰,丰满并走向成熟。通过对俄狄浦斯形象符号化的考察,我们发现,在每个阶段中,俄狄浦斯形象的生成和它所涵盖的意义也在发生变化。 本文共分为五个部分：第一部分为引言,梳理评述国内外对俄狄浦斯的研究现状,对索福克勒斯的文学作品做了简单的介绍,并说明了本文研究角度与特色、学术价值及意义。第二部分,探讨俄狄浦斯的原型,即进入戏剧之前,存在于神话体系中的俄狄浦斯及其家族。第三部分,戏剧经典《俄狄浦斯王》。通过分析人物的多重身份及其命运悲剧之间的关系,揭示出俄狄浦斯积极的主体形象。第四部分,对批评视野中的俄狄浦斯热进行简要分析。重点探讨弗洛伊德的“俄狄浦斯情结”以及《俄狄浦斯王》文本的反理论性。第五部分,结语,对本论文做一个总体的概括。
[Abstract]:Oedipus story has been handed down to this day, has been given too much meaning and symbol. From the Oedipus in the ancient Greek mythology to the Oedipus king in the ancient Greek tragedy, to all kinds of arguments about the Oedipus complex today, the changing form and presentation mode of the image of Oedipus are symbolized. From the beginning of its birth to today's evolution, Oedipus's evolution can be summarized as a process of symbolization. This process can be roughly divided into three stages, that is, the formation of the ancient Greek mythology, the development of the image of the later classic literature, and then to today's love complex pronoun, to a certain extent, become the exclusive noun. The figure of Oedipus gradually became clear, plump and matured. By examining the symbolization of Oedipus image, we find that the generation of Oedipus image and the meaning it covers are also changing in each stage. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, combing and reviewing the research status of Oedipus at home and abroad, making a brief introduction to Sophocles' literary works, and explaining the research angle and characteristics, academic value and significance of this paper. The second part discusses the archetype of Oedipus, that is, Oedipus and his family which existed in the mythological system before entering the drama. The third part is the drama classic King Oedipus. By analyzing the relationship between the multiple identities of the characters and the tragedy of their fate, this paper reveals the positive subject image of Oedipus. The fourth part is a brief analysis of Oedipus fever in the view of criticism. Focus on Freud's Oedipus complex and the anti-theoretical nature of King Oedipus. The fifth part, the conclusion, makes a general summary of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：西北民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I545.073
本文编号：2203867
[Abstract]:Oedipus story has been handed down to this day, has been given too much meaning and symbol. From the Oedipus in the ancient Greek mythology to the Oedipus king in the ancient Greek tragedy, to all kinds of arguments about the Oedipus complex today, the changing form and presentation mode of the image of Oedipus are symbolized. From the beginning of its birth to today's evolution, Oedipus's evolution can be summarized as a process of symbolization. This process can be roughly divided into three stages, that is, the formation of the ancient Greek mythology, the development of the image of the later classic literature, and then to today's love complex pronoun, to a certain extent, become the exclusive noun. The figure of Oedipus gradually became clear, plump and matured. By examining the symbolization of Oedipus image, we find that the generation of Oedipus image and the meaning it covers are also changing in each stage. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, combing and reviewing the research status of Oedipus at home and abroad, making a brief introduction to Sophocles' literary works, and explaining the research angle and characteristics, academic value and significance of this paper. The second part discusses the archetype of Oedipus, that is, Oedipus and his family which existed in the mythological system before entering the drama. The third part is the drama classic King Oedipus. By analyzing the relationship between the multiple identities of the characters and the tragedy of their fate, this paper reveals the positive subject image of Oedipus. The fourth part is a brief analysis of Oedipus fever in the view of criticism. Focus on Freud's Oedipus complex and the anti-theoretical nature of King Oedipus. The fifth part, the conclusion, makes a general summary of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：西北民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I545.073
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王建仓;;《俄狄浦斯王》与《红楼梦》结构诗学及生命哲学比较[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 韦岩鹰;勒内·吉拉尔美学思想研究[D];广西师范大学;2007年
2 于琳;试论德尔斐神谕对希腊城邦政治活动的影响[D];华东师范大学;2008年
3 杜益文;论索福克勒斯的悲剧艺术[D];华中师范大学;2008年
4 李建;论古希腊悲剧中的命运观[D];山东大学;2008年
，本文编号：2203867
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2203867.html
