关于《古今乐纂》和音乐文献的辨伪

发布时间：2018-05-02 08:23

本文选题：音乐文献 + 史料　；参考：《文艺研究》2008年11期

【摘要】：本文对《古今乐纂》一段佚文作详细考证,阐释其中蕴含的音乐史信息,进而确认其真实性。通过对"《古今乐纂》伪造说"的分析,作者提出音乐文献辨伪的原则和方法,即:一、读懂文献,正确标点;二、对相关史料作客观比较,避免先入为主的成见;三、"多闻阙疑",用充分考据的方式和保留沉默权的方式处理疑点;四、以"同情的理解"批判对象,尊重其时代属性和表述习惯;五、注意个别现象与制度化现象的区别,以及事物名称在广义与狭义上的区别,避免比附;六、作判断时寻找系统的证据,不立孤证,更不立臆说;七、正视不利于己说的证据,不故意回避;八、考查著录之时要做到资料完备并和推究征引相结合;九、正确理解同书异名、同名异书等情况,分清名实;十、提升修养,达到"知"的境界。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a detailed textual research on a piece of lost text in the compilation of Ancient and Modern Music, explains the historical information of music contained therein, and then confirms its authenticity. Based on the analysis of the theory of forgery, the author puts forward the principles and methods of discriminating the musical documents, that is, to understand the literature and punctuate correctly, to make an objective comparison of the relevant historical materials and to avoid preconceived preconceptions; Third, to deal with doubts in the form of adequate textual research and retention of the right to silence; fourth, to criticize the object of "understanding with compassion," and to respect its epoch attributes and expressive habits; and, fifthly, to pay attention to the difference between individual phenomena and institutionalized phenomena. And the difference between the broad sense and narrow sense of the name of things, to avoid comparing them; sixthly, to look for systematic evidence when making judgments, not to establish solitary evidence, and not to make assumptions; seventh, to face up to evidence that is not conducive to what one says, and not to deliberately evade it; and eighth, When examining and cataloguing, we should complete the data and combine the investigation and quotation; ninth, we should correctly understand the synonyms of the same books and the different books of the same name, and distinguish the names and facts; tenth, we should enhance our cultivation and reach the realm of "knowing".
【作者单位】：四川师范大学文学院;
【基金】：执行日本住友财团资助项目“大陆音乐在日本的遗存”
【分类号】：J609.2

【参考文献】