数字化时代的传统音乐分类问题思考——以戏曲“声腔”为例

发布时间：2018-07-18 10:23

【摘要】：现代逻辑学的观点把分类又称作划分……因此分类学也是一种符号逻辑学。无论是自然学科还是社会学科,都把对其研究对象进行相对科学的、合乎逻辑的分类看作是十分重要的科研课题持续关注,这种理性的研究方法与思维模式值得音乐学界学习。关注各具体音乐事项或乐种的分类问题,对中国音乐的学科建设和健全具有十分重要的现实意义和历史意义。假如我们仅把分类研究作为学界自己闭门造车的"活儿",或仅作为学者之间闲来无事进行笔墨官司的干仗素材的话,那么有无分类或者说分类标准是否可用都无关紧要,也不需要如此关注。但当音乐作为公共资源,特别是作为数字资源处理的今天,分类和建立分类标准就成为了当前焦点。因为,没有标准就无法进行资源分类,没有分类就无法进入数字化管理,没有数字化管理就奢谈资源全社会共享。而这一切的基础,就是首先要建立一套相对适应可行的标准。
[Abstract]:Classification is also called division in the view of modern logic. So taxonomy is also a symbolic logic. Both natural and social subjects regard the scientific and logical classification of their research objects as a very important scientific research subject. This rational research method and mode of thinking are worthy of study in music circles. It is of great practical and historical significance to pay attention to the specific music items or the classification of music types for the construction and perfection of Chinese music. It does not matter whether there is a classification or whether the classification criteria are available if we only consider classification as the "work" of the academic community behind closed doors, or merely as a source of idle litigation among scholars. Nor does it require such attention. However, when music is treated as a public resource, especially as a digital resource, classification and establishment of classification standards have become the current focus. Because there is no standard, there is no classification of resources, no classification can not enter into digital management, no digital management, talk about the sharing of resources in the whole society. And all of this is based on the establishment of a set of relatively feasible standards for adaptation.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：J617.5

【相似文献】