当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 音乐技术论文 >

论“商”声与“商”调

发布时间:2018-09-14 12:23
【摘要】: 关于西周雅乐是“商”声或是“商”调的问题,古今学者都有论及。认为西周雅乐无“商”声的要从汉代的郑玄开始,唐代的贾公颜进行注疏的时候依旧延续郑玄之意。此说影响甚大,以至于后世有相当一部分学者都确信西周雅乐无“商”声,再加上大量西周早期编钟的出土,客观的无“商”声的测音数据让更多人坚信了西周雅乐无“商”声的史实。但是,清代的解经家们像孙诒让、孔光森、李光地等人看到了此说的破绽之处,并提出西周雅乐并非无“商”声,乃无“商”调的看法,近人黄翔鹏亦同意此说。但是,一涉及西周编钟之所以无“商”声的原因的时候,多数学者将西周编钟无“商”声的原因都不可避免的归结于政治原因,并无涉及其它可能会造成西周编钟无“商”声的原因。笔者欲根据前人的研究成果,通过重新整理历史文献,运用考古学上的最新成果,对“商”声、“商”调之争作进一步的阐释和考证,并试图重新解释无“商”的重要原因。
[Abstract]:Ancient and modern scholars have talked about whether the western Zhou Dynasty's elegant music is a "Shang" sound or a "Shang" tone. It is believed that the sound of "Shang" in the Western Zhou Dynasty should start from Zheng Xuan in the Han Dynasty, and that Jia Guangyan of the Tang Dynasty still continued Zheng Xuan's idea when he was annotated. The influence of this theory was so great that a considerable number of scholars in later generations were convinced that there was no "Shang" sound in the elegant music of the Western Zhou Dynasty, coupled with a large number of bells unearthed in the early Western Zhou Dynasty. The objective data of non-quotient sound make more people believe in the historical facts of the non-Shang sound of the Western Zhou Dynasty. However, in the Qing Dynasty, scholars like Sun Yi-Jean, Kong Guangsen, Li Guangdi and others saw the flaws in this theory, and put forward the view that the Western Zhou Yale was not without the "Shang" sound, but without the "Shang" tone. Huang Xiangpeng, a modern person, also agreed with this view. However, when it comes to the reason why there was no "Shang" in the Western Zhou Dynasty, most scholars attributed the reasons for the absence of "Shang" to the political reasons. There are no other possible reasons why the bell of the Western Zhou Dynasty did not sound "Shang". According to the previous research results, by rearranging the historical documents and using the latest results in archaeology, the author intends to further explain and verify the argument of "Shang" and "Shang", and try to reexplain the important reasons why there is no "quotient".
【学位授予单位】:中国艺术研究院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:J609.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 华云刚;;从《莺莺传》到《西厢记》的诗歌演变[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2011年01期

2 孙颖;;张炎《词源》宫调研究[J];艺术教育;2011年07期

3 刘尊明;李志丽;;唐五代词中的“小夜曲”——《更漏子》[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年04期

4 徐丽丽;;丁}瞪⑶陈踇J];聊城大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相关重要报纸文章 前3条

1 记者 管丽雅;“保障代理”更保障 企业用工更轻松[N];经济日报;2000年

2 高峰 刘卫华 杨建杰;“红肩章”:“Y”字军中难有作为吗?[N];中国国防报;2002年

3 刘峡;黄埔口岸小轿车进口同比增两成[N];中国机电日报;2002年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 任飞;论“商”声与“商”调[D];中国艺术研究院;2008年



本文编号:2242703

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yinyuetheory/2242703.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户61de0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com