当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 呼吸病论文 >

影像学与实验室检测指标联合诊断尘肺结核的价值分析

发布时间:2017-12-31 00:51

  本文关键词:影像学与实验室检测指标联合诊断尘肺结核的价值分析 出处:《华北理工大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 尘肺 尘肺结核 诊断方法 ROC曲线 联合试验


【摘要】:目的通过对比分析尘肺结核组与尘肺非结核组影像学及实验室检测指标的差异,筛选尘肺结核的特征性指标,评价各指标独立和联合应用时诊断尘肺结核的临床意义,为临床减少诊断性治疗,提高诊断效率提供科学依据。方法实验室检测由医院检验科完成,研究生负责数据采集,填写调查表。影像学检查结果由资深医师指导确定,制作调查表,按照调查表的要求记录检查结果。所得资料用Epidata3.1建立数据库,采用SPSS18.0统计软件包进行统计学处理。单因素分析(即组间比较)采用t检验或卡方检验,多因素筛选采用Logistic回归模型;计量资料进行相关回归分析,计数资料进行一致性分析;计算筛选出的各指标的灵敏度、特异度、约登指数、kappa值,采用ROC曲线进行比较;根据指标独立使用时的灵敏度和特异度,确定联合试验的类型(串联试验或并联试验);计算不同指标组合时的灵敏度、特异度、约登指数、kappa值及ROC曲线下的面积,确定联合试验的类型及最佳组合。结果1 C反应蛋白诊断尘肺结核的最佳临界值(cutoff值)为6.5,其灵敏度为71%,特异度为85%,约登指数(YI)为0.56,与尘肺结核分组的秩相关系数为0.566(P0.01),C反应蛋白诊断尘肺结核ROC曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.801;γ-干扰素释放试验灵敏度为86%,特异度为53%,YI为0.39,kappa值为0.39(P0.01),AUC=0.695;ASSURE TB Rapid灵敏度为48%,特异度为89%,YI为0.37,kappa值为0.37(P0.01),AUC=0.685;影像学空洞表现灵敏度为36%,特异度为98%,YI为0.34,kappa值为0.34(P0.01),AUC=0.670;影像学片状表现灵敏度为73%,特异度为56%,YI为0.29,kappa值为0.29(P0.01),AUC=0.645;影像学团块表现灵敏度为30%,特异度为91%,YI为0.21,kappa值为0.21(P0.01),AUC=0.6052诊断效率最佳的组合模型为影像学空洞、团块、片状并联方案与实验室检查C反应蛋白、γ-干扰素释放试验并联方案进行串联,结果显示此法的灵敏度为92%,特异度为74%,约登指数(YI)为0.66,kappa值为0.66(P0.01),ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.825。结论1各诊断方法单独使用的诊断效率从高到低排序为C反应蛋白、γ-干扰素释放试验、ASSURE TB R apid、影像学空洞表现、影像学片状表现、影像学团块表现。2诊断效率最佳的组合模型为影像学空洞、团块、片状并联方案与实验室检查C反应蛋白、γ-干扰素释放试验并联方案进行串联。
[Abstract]:Objective through the comparative analysis of pneumoconiosis tuberculosis and pneumoconiosis group differences non tuberculosis group imaging and laboratory indexes, index screening of tuberculosis, clinical significance in diagnosis of pneumoconiosis tuberculosis evaluation indexes of independent and combined application, to reduce clinical diagnostic treatment, provide scientific basis for improving the efficiency of diagnosis. Methods by laboratory testing the hospital laboratory, graduate is responsible for data collection and questionnaire. The results of imaging examination by senior physician guidance, making questionnaire, according to the inspection results recorded data obtained from the questionnaire. The database was established by Epidata3.1, using SPSS18.0 statistical software for statistical analysis. Single factor analysis (i.e., comparison between groups using t test or chi) square test, multiple factors were screened by Logistic regression model; correlation regression analysis of measurement data, count data consistency analysis meter; The sensitivity of each index is selected the specificity and Youden index, kappa value, ROC curve is used to compare; according to the sensitivity and specificity of independent use, determine the type of joint test (test series or parallel test); index calculation of different combinations of sensitivity, specificity and Youden index, kappa value and the area under the ROC curve, determine the type of joint test and the best combination of the best results. The critical 1 C reactive protein in diagnosis of pneumoconiosis tuberculosis value (cutoff value) was 6.5, the sensitivity was 71%, specificity was 85%, Youden index (YI) was 0.56, and the rank correlation coefficient is 0.566 (group of pneumoconiosis tuberculosis P0.01), C reactive protein in diagnosis of pneumoconiosis tuberculosis area under curve ROC (AUC) 0.801; interferon gamma release test sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 53%, YI was 0.39, kappa was 0.39 (P0.01), AUC=0.695 ASSURE TB Rapid; the sensitivity was 48%, specificity was 8. 9%, YI was 0.37, kappa was 0.37 (P0.01), AUC=0.685; imaging performance of cavity sensitivity was 36%, specificity was 98%, YI was 0.34, kappa was 0.34 (P0.01), AUC=0.670; imaging sheet performance sensitivity was 73%, specificity was 56%, YI was 0.29, kappa value is 0.29 (P0.01, AUC=0.645); imaging performance of mass sensitivity was 30%, specificity was 91%, YI was 0.21, kappa was 0.21 (P0.01), a combination of the optimal model of the AUC=0.6052 diagnostic efficiency for the imaging hole, mass, flake parallel scheme and laboratory examination of C reactive protein, interferon gamma release test in parallel program the results show that the series, the sensitivity was 92%, specificity was 74%, Youden index (YI) was 0.66, kappa was 0.66 (P0.01), the area under the ROC curve (AUC) using a separate diagnostic efficiency was 0.825. conclusion 1 diagnosis methods from high to low sort of C reactive protein, interferon gamma release ASSURE TB R apid test. The best combination model of imaging cavity performance, imaging slice appearance, imaging mass and.2 diagnosis efficiency is imaging cavity, lump, flake parallel scheme, and laboratory test C reactive protein, gamma interferon release test parallel scheme in series.

【学位授予单位】:华北理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R135.2;R521

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨日芳,高先凤;老年尘肺结核并慢性肺原性心脏病的观察与护理[J];大同医学专科学校学报;2001年03期

2 张健;14例尘肺结核调查与分析[J];职业卫生与病伤;2002年04期

3 孔冬青;尘肺结核并发持久的三度房室传导阻滞1例[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2003年09期

4 张欣;张荣波;许礼发;王永祥;;尘肺结核患者血清中某些免疫指标的表达及意义[J];中国职业医学;2008年01期

5 王文举;尘肺结核的临床研究[J];日本医学介绍;1987年08期

6 万国顺;对某市尘肺结核的流行病学分析[J];工业卫生与职业病;1991年02期

7 郭平,张仲平;煤矿工人尘肺结核患者转归调查[J];中国工业医学杂志;1992年02期

8 袁素泼;卢光玉;;尘肺结核临床诊断的初步探讨[J];贵州医药;1993年04期

9 孙晓红,张方清;尘肺结核的防治与护理探析[J];邯郸医学高等专科学校学报;1999年04期

10 甘传伟,杨俊芝;802例尘肺结核病例的调查[J];中国工业医学杂志;2000年05期

相关会议论文 前2条

1 王希霞;;老年尘肺结核并发慢性肺源性心脏病的观察与护理[A];甘肃省中医药学会2010年会员代表大会暨学术年会论文汇编[C];2010年

2 彭娟娟;瞿菁;贾晓东;李朝伟;徐丽玲;汪森然;;尘肺结核生存年限与死亡危险度分析[A];2008年全国职业性呼吸系统疾病学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 刘钊;影像学与实验室检测指标联合诊断尘肺结核的价值分析[D];华北理工大学;2016年

2 唐桂钰;河北钢铁集团接尘工人尘肺结核流行规律及其发病影响因素研究[D];河北联合大学;2011年

3 马英华;山东省煤矿工人尘肺结核患病现状分析及防治对策研究[D];济南大学;2015年

4 王晓秋;淮南矿区尘肺结核患者结核分枝杆菌L型感染及耐药性研究[D];安徽理工大学;2005年

5 陆军;淮南矿区尘肺结核患者结核分枝杆菌L型相关耐药基因突变研究[D];安徽理工大学;2006年



本文编号:1357337

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/huxijib/1357337.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d9003***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com