不同血液净化方式对尿毒症瘙痒症的影响
本文选题:Meta分析 切入点:肾透析 出处:《重庆医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:研究血液透析(HD)联合血液灌流(HP)与血液透析滤过(HDF)治疗尿毒症瘙痒的临床疗效。方法:计算机检索Cochrane library、PubMed、CNKI、万方和维普数据库中关于HD联合HP与HDF治疗尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒的随机对照试验,手工检索国内各种医学期刊、专著及会议资料和学位论文,检索时限为建库至2015年10月,同时查阅所获取的参考文献索引。两名研究者对检索收集到的文献按照制定的纳入排除标准进行独立筛选。采用可视模拟评分法(VAS)、皮肤瘙痒疗效判定标准、Dirk R Kuypers评分、甲状旁腺素(PTH)、Ca2+、P3-作为评价指标。采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:总共纳入随机对照研究9篇,一共有患者405例。Meta分析结果显示:HD+HP组比HD+HDF组对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒治疗疗效及对血尿素氮(BUN)的清除效果更好,HD+HDF组比HD+HP组对维持性血液透析患者的Scr、P3-清除效果更好,而两组对PTH的降低及Ca2+的影响差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:HD+HP透析方式对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒的治疗更加有效。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the clinical effect of hemodialysis (HD) combined with hemoperfusion (HP) and hemodiafiltration (HD) on uraemia pruritus.Methods: a randomized controlled trial of HD combined with HP and HDF for the treatment of skin pruritus in uremic patients was searched by computer in Cochrane library.PubMedi, Wanfang and Wiper databases, and various medical journals, monographs, conference materials and dissertations in China were manually searched.The time limit for the retrieval is to build the database until October 2015, and to consult the index of the reference documents obtained at the same time.Two researchers independently screened the collected literature according to the inclusion exclusion criteria.Visual analogue scoring method was used to evaluate the efficacy of pruritus. The criteria for evaluating the curative effect of pruritus were Dirk R Kuypers score and parathyroid hormone (PTH) and Ca 2 + P3- were used as the evaluation index.Meta analysis was carried out with Review Manager 5.3 software.Results: a total of 9 randomized controlled studies were conducted.The results of Meta-analysis showed that the effect of HDF group was better than that of HD HDF group in the treatment of skin pruritus in uremic patients and the clearance of bun (bun) in blood. HD HDF group was better than HD HP group in the clearance of ScrP3- in maintenance hemodialysis patients.However, there was no significant difference in the decrease of PTH and the effect of Ca2 between the two groups (P 0.05).Conclusion: the treatment of pruritus in uremia patients is more effective.
【学位授予单位】:重庆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R692.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯彬;孙扬昕;孙滨;;不同血液净化模式对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒的影响[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2015年24期
2 李杰;董一民;周龙珍;付柏籽;;血液透析联合血液灌流与联合血液透析滤过治疗维持性血液透析患者皮肤瘙痒的效果观察[J];中国当代医药;2015年20期
3 陈阳;;不同血液净化方法对尿毒症皮肤瘙痒的疗效探讨[J];深圳中西医结合杂志;2015年06期
4 杨玉贵;孙学会;孙义锋;施永仿;周宗祥;;连续性肾脏替代疗法与血液灌流治疗尿毒症瘙痒的临床研究[J];实用医技杂志;2014年10期
5 单新莉;张玮;陈晨;刘洋;张云莲;;血液透析联合血液灌流对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒的疗效观察及护理[J];中华全科医学;2014年01期
6 第加美;袁玲;冯文;万秀娟;陈秀;刘智;;组合型人工肾治疗血液透析患者皮肤瘙痒的临床研究[J];实用医技杂志;2013年09期
7 李恒;邓凤英;张圆;;血液透析滤过联合血液灌流治疗顽固性尿毒症性瘙痒症的疗效及护理[J];牡丹江医学院学报;2012年03期
8 刘瑞;赵静;柯昌云;;尿毒症皮肤瘙痒的发病机制及中西医治疗[J];中国老年保健医学;2012年02期
9 金东华;石永兵;沈华英;施晓松;何涛;宋锴;詹周兵;;组合型人工肾对尿毒症患者皮肤瘙痒的疗效观察[J];临床皮肤科杂志;2012年03期
10 李忠琳;吴军燕;梁晓玲;黄秀娟;罗是;;三种血液净化方法治疗尿毒症皮肤瘙痒疗效比较[J];现代医院;2010年06期
,本文编号:1712861
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/1712861.html