当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 泌尿论文 >

miR-106a、miR-21在肾细胞癌中的表达及临床意义研究

发布时间:2018-05-25 06:36

  本文选题:肾细胞癌 + 血清 ; 参考:《新疆医科大学》2017年博士论文


【摘要】:目的:通过回顾性分析我中心近10年收治的1005例肾细胞癌患者临床资料,了解新疆地区肾细胞癌患者临床特点、病理类型、种族特征等流行病学特点。检测肾细胞癌患者血清中miR-106a与miR-21的表达水平,分析其与健康人群中的表达差异,评价其能否用于肾细胞癌的早期诊断;同时检测miR-106a、mi R-21在手术前、后的表达水平变化,并研究其与临床病理特征间的相互关系及临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2006年1月至2015年12月就诊于我院且行手术治疗的1005例新发肾细胞癌患者的临床和病理学特点,分别对性别构成、发病年龄、城乡分布、民族构成、危险因素、治疗方式、病理特征进行分析。并以2013年2月至2015年2月期间在我中心收集的30例新诊断为肾细胞癌患者的术前血清样本作为实验组,另外收集30例健康体检者的血清样本作为对照组,采用实时荧光定量PCR技术检测各组血清样本中miR-106a、miR-21表达水平,分析其在肾细胞癌及健康人群中的表达是否存在差异。对上述30例实验组患者再对应的收集其术后1个月、6个月血清样本作为本研究的术后组,分别检测各血清样本中术后1个月、6个月miR-106a、mi R-21表达水平,分析其表达水平与术前组间的差异以及与病理特征的相关性。结果:1055例肾细胞癌患者中男性患者占672例(66.9%),女性患者333例(33.1%),男女比例为2.02:1.00;发病年龄12岁~88岁,平均年龄54.2岁,高发年龄为40岁~60岁;城市地区患者人数为806例,农村地区患者人数为199例,城市地区发病率为农村地区的4.1倍;2006年就诊41例(4.1%),2007年就诊55例(5.5%),2008年就诊81例(8.1%),2009年就诊107例(10.6%),2010年就诊115例(11.4%),2011年就诊125例(12.4%),2012年就诊94例(9.4%),2013年就诊111例(11.0%),2014年就诊137例(13.6%),2015年就诊139例(13.8%),按患者就诊年份排序,可见就诊人数逐年升高;民族构成中汉族605例(60.1%),少数民族400例(39.8%),汉族构成比例较少数民族高。不同人口特征肾细胞癌患者的病理类型进行比较,结果显示随着年龄的增长,肾细胞癌患者中透明细胞癌的比例呈上升趋势(p0.05);汉族患者中透明细胞癌所占比例显著高于少数民族患者(p0.05);男性和女性肾细胞癌患者病理类型的差异无统计学意义(p0.05)。城市和乡镇肾细胞癌患者病理类型的差异无统计学意义(p0.05)。城市和乡镇肾细胞癌患者的临床分期和病理分级进行比较,结果显示相对于城市患者,乡镇患者的临床分期较晚,病理分级较高,其差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。肾细胞癌患者根据是否吸烟、是否有高血压和是否有糖尿病等情况分组,比较不同组患者的临床分期和病理分级,结果显示其差异无统计学意义(p0.05),即吸烟、高血压和糖尿病等特征对肾细胞癌患者的临床分期和病理分级无影响。手术方式随年变化趋势可见开放手术比例逐年下降,而腔镜手术比例逐年上升;手术种类随年变化趋势可见根治术比例逐年下降,而保留肾单位手术比例逐年上升;患者住院天数也在随年逐渐下降。肾细胞癌与健康对照组外周血mir-106a、mir-21测定结果显示,肾细胞癌组血清中mir-106a的相对表达量为8.87(2.71~12.68),健康对照组外周血清mir-106a的相对表达量为0.87(0.31~2.13),与对照组相比较,肾细胞癌组血清mir-106a的相对表达量呈明显高表达,两组相对表达量差异具有统计学意义(z=-4.728,p=0.0001);在肾细胞癌组中,mirna-106a表达下调者有4例(13.3%),而表达量上调有26例(86.7%)。肾细胞癌组血清中mir-21的相对表达量为8.49(3.92~16.68),健康对照组中血清mirna-21的相对表达量为0.79(0.69~3.60),肾细胞癌组中mir-21相对表达量与对照组相比,其表达水平明显增高,其相对表达量差异具有统计学意义(z=-4.727,p=0.0001);根据mir-106a的表达量差异来绘制roc曲线,结果显示其曲线下面积(auc)为0.801(95%ci:0.710~0.963,p=0.0001),灵敏度为0.750,特异度为0.814,约登指数为0.564。根据mir-21的表达量差异来绘制roc曲线,结果显示其曲线下面积(auc)为0.854(95%ci:0.786~0.947,p=0.0001),灵敏度为0.795,特异度为0.907,约登指数为0.702,采用mir-106a与mir-106a进行联合检测,其结果显示系列实验中灵敏度下降为0.596,特异度为上升为0.983,约登指数为0.579;平行实验中灵敏度提高为0.949,特异度下降为0.738,约登指数为0.687。进一步检测肾细胞癌患者对应术后1个月、6个月的外周血mir-106a、mir-21表达水平,术后1月组中mir-106a相对表达量为1.12(0.38~2.57),mir-21相对表达量为0.61(0.42~1.07),与健康对照组比较,术后1月组中mir-106a(z=-0.214,p=0.708)及mir-21(z=-1.301,p=0.272)表达水平差异没有统计学意义;与术前组相比,术后1月组mir-106a(z=-4.218,p=0.0001)及mir-21(z=-3.119,p=0.002)表达水平明显下降,其差异具有统计学意义;术后6个月组中mir-106a相对表达量为1.01(0.23~2.44),mir-21相对表达量为0.71(0.39~1.27),与健康对照组比较,术后6月组中miR-106a(Z=-0.232,P=0.874)及miR-21(Z=-1.221,P=0.291)表达水平差异无统计学意义。miR-106a、mi R-21在肾细胞癌患者外周血清的表达与肿瘤的组织病理学分级、临床分期无关(P0.05)。结论:肾细胞癌患者血清中miR-106a和miR-21的表达水平明显上调,ROC曲线分析提示其已经达到临床应用价值,是肾细胞癌可选的分子标志物。血清miR-106a和mi R-21的表达水平在切除肿瘤病灶后均明显下降,并在术后表达水平稳定,提示其有望用于术后随访监测。
[Abstract]:Objective: through a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 1005 cases of renal cell carcinoma in our center in recent 10 years, the clinical characteristics, pathological types and racial characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in Xinjiang were analyzed, and the expression of miR-106a and miR-21 in the serum of renal cell carcinoma patients was detected and the difference of expression in the healthy population was analyzed. To evaluate whether it can be used in the early diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, and to detect the changes in the expression level of miR-106a, MI R-21 before and after operation, and to study the relationship between the clinicopathological features and the clinical application value. Methods: a retrospective analysis of 1005 cases of new renal cell carcinoma in our hospital from January 2006 to December 2015 and the operation treatment of renal cell carcinoma was reviewed. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were analyzed in terms of gender composition, age of onset, urban and rural distribution, ethnic composition, risk factors, treatment and pathological features, and 30 newly diagnosed patients with renal cell carcinoma were collected in our center from February 2013 to February 2015 as experimental group, and 30 cases of health were collected. The serum samples of the examiners were used as the control group. The expression of miR-106a and miR-21 in the serum samples of each group was detected by real time fluorescence quantitative PCR. The difference in the expression of the serum samples in the renal cell carcinoma and the healthy population was analyzed. The serum samples of the 30 patients in the experimental group were collected for 1 months after the operation, and the serum samples were taken as this study for 6 months. After operation, the expression level of miR-106a and MI R-21 was detected in 1 months, 6 months after operation, and the correlation between the expression level and the preoperative group and the pathological features were analyzed. Results: 1055 cases of renal cell carcinoma were male 672 cases (66.9%), women 333 cases (33.1%), male and female ratio 2.02:1.00; age 12. ~88 years old, the average age of 54.2 years and the age of 40 years old at the age of 40 years, 806 cases in urban areas, 199 in rural areas, 4.1 times in the urban area, 41 in 2006 (4.1%), 55 in 2007 (5.5%), 81 in 2008 (8.1%), 2009 for 107 cases (10.6%) and 2010 visits in 2010. In 2011, there were 125 cases (12.4%), 94 cases (9.4%) in 2012, 111 cases in 2013 (11%), 137 in 2014 (13.6%), 139 in 2015 (13.8%). According to the year of the patients, the number of patients was increased year by year, 605 (60.1%) in the ethnic group and minority 400 cases (39.8%), and the proportion of Han nationality was higher than that of minority nationalities. The pathological types of the patients with human renal cell carcinoma were compared. The results showed that the proportion of clear cell carcinoma in the patients with renal cell carcinoma increased with age (P0.05), and the proportion of clear cell carcinoma in Han patients was significantly higher than that of ethnic minority patients (P0.05), and the pathological types of renal cell carcinoma in male and female were different. Statistical significance (P0.05). The pathological types of renal cell carcinoma patients in cities and towns were not statistically significant (P0.05). The clinical stages and pathological grades of renal cell carcinoma patients in cities and towns were compared. The results showed that compared with urban patients, the clinical stages of township patients were late, and the pathological grades were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05 Patients with renal cell carcinoma were divided into groups according to whether they were smoking, whether there were hypertension or whether there was diabetes. The clinical stages and pathological grades of different groups were compared. The results showed that the difference was not statistically significant (P0.05), that is, smoking, hypertension and diabetes had no effect on the clinical staging and pathological classification of patients with renal cell carcinoma. The rate of open operation decreased year by year, and the proportion of endoscopic surgery increased year by year, and the trend of radical operation decreased year by year, while the proportion of kidney preserving operation increased year by year, and the number of hospitalization days decreased gradually. The peripheral blood of renal cell carcinoma and healthy control group was mir-106a, Mir The relative expression of mir-106a in the serum of renal cell carcinoma group was 8.87 (2.71~12.68), and the relative expression of serum mir-106a in the healthy control group was 0.87 (0.31~2.13). Compared with the control group, the relative expression of serum mir-106a in the renal cell carcinoma group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The difference of the relative expression of the two groups was statistically significant, and the difference of the relative expression of the two groups was statistically significant. Z=-4.728 (p=0.0001); in the renal cell carcinoma group, the expression of mirna-106a expression was 4 (13.3%), and the expression was up to 26 (86.7%). The relative expression of miR-21 in the serum of the renal cell carcinoma group was 8.49 (3.92~16.68), the relative expression of miRNA-21 in the healthy control group was 0.79 (0.69~3.60), and the relative expression of miR-21 in the renal cell carcinoma group and the relative expression of miR-21 in the renal cell carcinoma group. The expression level of the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group (z=-4.727, p=0.0001), and the ROC curve was drawn according to the difference of mir-106a expression. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.801 (95%ci:0.710~0.963, p=0.0001), the sensitivity was 0.750, the specificity was 0.814, and the Jordan index was 0.564. based mir-. 21 of the difference in expression to draw the ROC curve, the results show that the area under the curve (AUC) is 0.854 (95%ci:0.786~0.947, p=0.0001), the sensitivity is 0.795, the specificity is 0.907, and the Jordan index is 0.702. The combined detection of mir-106a and mir-106a shows that the sensitivity of the series is 0.596, the specificity rises to 0.983, about 0.983. The index was 0.579, the sensitivity of the parallel experiment was 0.949, the specificity decreased to 0.738, and the mir-106a index was 0.687., and the expression level of mir-106a and miR-21 in the peripheral blood was 1.12 (0.38~2.57) in the January group, and the relative expression of miR-21 was 0.61 (0.42~1.07) in the January group. Compared with the healthy control group, there was no significant difference in the expression level of mir-106a (z=-0.214, p=0.708) and miR-21 (z=-1.301, p=0.272) in the January group. Compared with the pre operation group, the level of mir-106a (z=-4.218, p=0.0001) and miR-21 (z=-3.119, p=0.002) in the January group decreased significantly, and the difference was statistically significant; 6 months after the operation, the difference was statistically significant. The relative expression of 106A was 1.01 (0.23~2.44), and the relative expression of miR-21 was 0.71 (0.39~1.27). Compared with the healthy control group, there was no significant difference in the expression level of miR-106a (Z=-0.232, P=0.874) and miR-21 (Z=-1.221, P=0.291) in the June group, and the expression of the peripheral blood serum and the histopathology of the tumor in the patients with renal cell carcinoma. P0.05. Conclusion: the expression level of miR-106a and miR-21 in the serum of renal cell carcinoma patients is obviously up-regulated. The ROC curve analysis suggests that it has reached clinical application value. It is an optional molecular marker of renal cell carcinoma. The expression level of serum miR-106a and MI R-21 decreased significantly after the tumor resection, and in the postoperative table. The level is stable, suggesting that it is expected to be used for postoperative follow-up monitoring.
【学位授予单位】:新疆医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R737.11

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 段建敏,李智,秦大山,陈一戎;肾细胞癌患者血清中血管内皮生长因子的表达[J];兰州医学院学报;2000年04期

2 袁建峰;肿瘤相关胰蛋白酶抑制因子作为肾细胞癌预后的一个因素[J];中华泌尿外科杂志;2001年08期

3 段建敏,李智,秦大山,史庭凯,董驰;血管内皮生长因子在肾细胞癌中的表达意义[J];中华泌尿外科杂志;2001年10期

4 李华,李玲;肾细胞癌的超声诊断[J];中国超声诊断杂志;2002年08期

5 卓栋,姜书传,韩杰,程庆水;肾细胞癌尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物表达的研究[J];皖南医学院学报;2002年04期

6 孙正船,曲延刚;肾细胞癌舌转移1例[J];诊断病理学杂志;2002年05期

7 张秀华,李光明,郭素霞;P~(16)在肾细胞癌癌组织中表达的临床意义探讨[J];山东医药;2003年20期

8 王金根,张元芳,丁强,陈波,金建军,王忠;血管内皮生长因子在肾细胞癌的表达及临床意义[J];中华医学杂志;2003年05期

9 彭作锋,张功亮,王建,秦文,宋乐明,蒋叔凯;幼儿肾细胞癌一例报告[J];中华泌尿外科杂志;2004年02期

10 魏建平,杜联芳,邢晋放,苏一巾;肾细胞癌超声表现分析[J];中国超声诊断杂志;2005年09期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 张进;董柏君;陈勇辉;陈奇;陈海戈;薛蔚;周立新;刘东明;黄翼然;;7cm以内肾细胞癌肿瘤大小与临床病理相关性研究[A];第十六届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2009年

2 任晓苏;毛泽庆;汝晓睿;史文生;张常青;;肾细胞癌的多层螺旋CT诊断[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年

3 刘跃新;毕维棋;陈山;张光银;乔庐东;郑宇朋;王伟;张波;;多房性肾细胞癌的诊断治疗[A];第六次全国中西医结合泌尿外科学术会议暨第二届湖南省中西医结合泌尿外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

4 韩苏军;李长岭;马建辉;肖振东;寿建忠;肖泽均;田军;王栋;毕新刚;管考鹏;鲁力;石鸿哲;关有彦;;双侧肾细胞癌15例报告[A];第十五届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文集[C];2008年

5 张开颜;邢金春;陈斌;刘荣福;王惠强;陈实新;周中泉;庄炫;陈跃东;李伟;段波;刘菲;杨宇峰;周鑫;郑嘉欣;曾彦恺;吴准;;多房性肾细胞癌的诊断治疗[A];华东六省一市泌尿外科学术年会暨2011年浙江省泌尿外科、男科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年

6 杜传军;徐杰;;肾细胞癌的外科治疗(附315例报告)[A];第七次中国中西医结合泌尿外科学术年会暨第二次广东省中西医结合泌尿外科学术年会论文集[C];2009年

7 杜传军;徐杰;;肾细胞癌的外科治疗(附315例报告)[A];2009年浙江省男科、泌尿外科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年

8 耿敬姝;赵玉兰;王艳颖;;肾细胞癌核形态定量分析的病理学研究[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年

9 詹敏;王颖斌;王辉萍;周乐;;手术治疗肾细胞癌(附49例报告)[A];第三届浙江中西部科技论坛论文集(第七卷 医学、抗癌分卷)[C];2006年

10 那彦群;孙则禹;叶章群;孙颖浩;马建辉;何志嵩;万奔;米振国;杜林栋;周芳坚;胡志全;靳风烁;黄翼然;戴玉田;宋毅;;肾细胞癌诊治指南(2005试行版)[A];贵州省医学会泌尿外科分会2006年学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 纪小龙;血管平滑肌脂肪瘤·肾细胞癌[N];卫生与生活报;2007年

2 译自《新英格兰医学杂志》2001年12月第345卷;转移性肾细胞癌结合治疗效佳[N];医药经济报;2001年

3 徐述湘;索拉非尼抗肾细胞癌获FDA批准[N];中国医药报;2006年

4 谷文;GSK公司申请将Pazopanib用于肾细胞癌治疗[N];中国医药报;2009年

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 黄庆波;血管内皮特异性因子DLL4在肾细胞癌肿瘤生长,侵袭,,血管生成及血行转移中的作用[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年

2 林友成;PIK3R1基因在肾细胞癌中的功能及调控机制研究[D];南方医科大学;2015年

3 吕蔡;miR-495靶向SATB1基因对肾细胞癌调控作用的研究[D];武汉大学;2015年

4 张冰;miR-155/PI3K/AKT/FOXO3a信号通路在肾细胞癌中作用机制的研究[D];山东大学;2015年

5 王新胜;MicroRNA-200a-3p靶向调控SPAG9基因对肾细胞癌生物学行为的影响[D];吉林大学;2016年

6 蔡冰;CMTM5对人肾癌细胞ACHN的生物学行为影响的初步研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年

7 曹峗杰;CASC2在肾细胞癌中的功能和调控机制研究[D];苏州大学;2016年

8 郑小丽;表观遗传药物逆转OCT2表达抑制和增敏肾细胞癌治疗的机理研究[D];浙江大学;2017年

9 哈木拉提·吐送;miR-106a、miR-21在肾细胞癌中的表达及临床意义研究[D];新疆医科大学;2017年

10 柳金顺;肾细胞癌差异蛋白质发现与筛选的实验研究[D];北京协和医学院;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 张德福;肾细胞癌的肾外临床特点及预后多因素分析[D];大连医科大学;2013年

2 杨建琪;肾细胞癌中WNK2基因甲基化状态与mRNA表达的研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年

3 朱玲;肾细胞癌靶向治疗药物的有效性和安全性评价[D];四川医科大学;2015年

4 赵康乐;P19在肾细胞癌中表达以及Bev+Sor+Gem三线治疗ⅡF及Ⅱ治疗失败的晚期肾细胞癌的研究[D];河南科技大学;2015年

5 曹翔;肾细胞癌假包膜的MRI表现及在肿瘤剜除术中的意义[D];南京大学;2014年

6 黄晋;肾癌临床资料回顾性分析[D];天津医科大学;2015年

7 栾雪;145例肾细胞癌患者的临床特点及预后多因素分析[D];大连医科大学;2015年

8 黄小平;肾细胞癌患者血清Ang2的表达及临床意义[D];山西医科大学;2016年

9 陈强;腹腔镜与开放保留肾单位手术治疗T1a期肾细胞癌的比较[D];山西医科大学;2016年

10 杨文杰;促血管生成素-2在肾细胞癌中的表达及其意义[D];山西医科大学;2016年



本文编号:1932459

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/1932459.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户35756***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com