建立一种简易评分系统预测前列腺穿刺活检前列腺癌阳性率
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the predictive factors of prostate cancer positive rate by transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: data of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy from January 2006 to April 2014 were summarized, including age (age), body mass index (BMI),) symptoms, (syptoms), rectal finger biopsy (DRE), total serum PSA (t PSA),. Free PSA (f PSA), ratio of free PSA to total PSA (f / t PSA), (PV), PSA density (PSAD).) Single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate regression model were used to screen the risk factors associated with positive rate of biopsy. On this basis, a scoring system was constructed as a tool to predict the positive rate of prostate cancer before biopsy, and the false positive rate was calculated by the (ROC) curve of the subjects' operating characteristics to detect the sensitivity of the scoring system. Results: of 385 patients with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy 139 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer and the positive rate was 36.1%. Univariate analysis showed that age (P0.01), DRE (P0.01), t PSA (P0.01), f PSA (P0.01), frt PSA (P0.01) between positive and negative biopsy group, The proportion of PV (P0.01) and PSAD (P0.01) in prostate cancer patients was higher than that in biopsy negative patients. Univariate regression significant factors were included in multivariate stepwise Logistic analysis. The results showed that age, t PSA,f/t PSA,PV and PSAD were independent influencing factors of prostate biopsies positive through rectum. The ratio of (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CIs) were 1.07 (1.05-1.16), 1.05 (1.02v 1.15), 0.97 (0.860.99), respectively. 0.98 (0.870.96) and 1.79 (1.482.06). According to their OR values, the set age of 71 years (median), t PSA14.1 渭 g / L), f / t PSA14.07 (median), PV42.8 ml (median) and PSAD0.31 渭 g/L/ml (median) were 1, respectively, with a total score of 5. The detection rate of prostate cancer was calculated by a scoring system in 385 patients. It was found that the detection rate of prostate cancer with a score of 0 1 / 2 or 3 / 4 and 5 / 5 was 7.69 / 8.98 / 15.19 and 39.39, respectively. The area under the curve indicated by 54.55% and 72.15%.ROC curve was 0.82. In addition, the detection rate of prostate cancer in patients with 3 ~ 5 scores was more than 50% higher than that with 0 ~ 2 scores (64%vs 11 / P0.01). Conclusion: this scoring system can help urologists identify patients who need prostate biopsies.
【作者单位】: 南通市第一人民医院泌尿外科;东南大学附属中大医院泌尿外科;
【分类号】:R737.25
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘希高;谌诚;李健;张凯;虞巍;何群;李淑清;山刚志;吴士良;金杰;;前列腺穿刺活检单针阳性患者前列腺内癌灶分布特点[J];中华男科学杂志;2012年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵云歆;江怡;姚敏;王颖;姚广力;康慧莉;蔡秋琼;梅将军;王健;;超声造影在前列腺癌诊断及指导前列腺活检中的价值探讨[J];肿瘤影像学;2014年01期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 钟晨阳,刘明,张力青,万奔;前列腺癌分期方法的临床评价[J];中华男科学;2003年02期
2 刘帅;吕家驹;傅强;张辉;高德轩;刘征;;血清tPSA、PSAD及Gleason评分在前列腺癌分期中的应用价值[J];中华男科学杂志;2010年05期
3 李昕,夏昊,周利群,那彦群;前列腺癌患者术前分期分级偏低的相关危险因素[J];中华泌尿外科杂志;2003年05期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨玻;田军;;碘伏保留灌肠对预防前列腺穿刺活检术后发热的作用[J];中华男科学杂志;2008年10期
2 李诺;孙家庆;阮园;;改良6针法前列腺穿刺活检的临床应用价值[J];山西医药杂志;2010年04期
3 杨百强;王文学;张晨辉;;前列腺穿刺活检48例临床分析[J];陕西医学杂志;2010年10期
4 张晖;刘淑云;吴春军;黄启静;祖会之;;前列腺穿刺活检标本30例病理诊断分析[J];医学信息(上旬刊);2011年08期
5 李国宏;关永祥;梁翔空;;超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检临床分析[J];当代医学;2013年21期
6 金浩祥,谢叔良,眭元庚,连保罗;自制前列腺穿刺活检针的初步应用[J];徐州医学院学报;1981年04期
7 陈莉;胡杨柳;;不同超声模式引导前列腺穿刺活检的对比研究[J];中国现代医学杂志;2009年11期
8 迟易欣;唐U,
本文编号:2421436
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2421436.html