当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

Toll样受体3介导病毒促进垂体瘤增殖侵袭的机制研究

发布时间:2018-05-11 19:02

  本文选题:垂体瘤 + 侵袭性 ; 参考:《第三军医大学》2016年博士论文


【摘要】:研究背景和目的:垂体瘤占颅内肿瘤约15%[1],其组织学为良性,但是有25-55%的垂体瘤朝周围结构浸润,比如鞍隔的骨性组织,筛窦和/或海绵窦等,这些垂体瘤称为侵袭性垂体瘤[2][3][4]。垂体瘤的侵袭性常与高Ki-67指数,并与严重的症状、更差的预后、高复发率、以及药物替代治疗的低反应性相关[5]。现有的研究已表明,染色体、基因(如:11p/q, p53),粘附分子(如:E-cadherin),金属基质蛋白(如:MMP2, MMP8),炎症因子(如:IL-6, IL-17)的异常变化与垂体瘤的进展、侵袭相关[5][6][7][8][9][10][11]。但评估、解释其侵袭性的特异性的组织学和分子生物学标准却依然缺乏。不仅如此,现有的研究多从垂体瘤自身基因、转录、转录后修饰等几个层面上的异常变化探索其侵袭性的来源,极少研究聚焦于外界环境如微生物感染等对垂体瘤发生发展的影响。15-20%的人类肿瘤都与促肿瘤病毒相关[12]。促肿瘤病毒促进肿瘤发生发展的一重要机制是慢性感染常导致氧化应激与炎症,受感染的细胞分泌炎症因子如IL-1β、IL-6及TNF-α,形成炎症环境(inflammatory milieu),炎症刺激、影响、激活NF-κB、STAT3及MAPKs等信号通路促进肿瘤的发展[13]。近年的研究发现,模式识别受体(PRRs)不仅表达在免疫细胞,还能在肿瘤细胞中有表达[14]。PRRs中最常见的是Toll样受体(TLR)家族,其家族的多个成员如TLR2[15],TLR3[16],TLR4[15][17]等均已证实在某些肿瘤中表达,且参与肿瘤的发生与发展,其中与病毒感染最为密切相关的是TLR3。各种来源双链RNA(dsRNA),坏死细胞来源或相关的RNA和人工合成的Poly(I:C)[18][19]均是TLR3的配体。病毒双向转录过程中形成的dsRNA可激活TLR3,这与病毒类型(DNA病毒、RNA病毒等)无关[20]。已有大量的研究表明,高危HPV16被发现与人类多种肿瘤发生相关,包括宫颈癌[21]、口咽癌[22]、肛门癌[23]以及头颈部癌[24]等。不仅如此,某些肿瘤中HPV16阳性的肿瘤细胞可更多朝周围结构侵袭,以及更远处的迁移[21]。HHV6是嗜B淋巴细胞病毒,与儿童淋巴瘤患者的预后密切相关[25]。而HSV1则与乳腺癌病人总体存活率相关,并且与吸烟、饮酒、HPV感染等因素综合决定头颈部癌的发生[26][27]。在垂体瘤中,尚未有报道其发生发展与某种病毒感染有关,因此,本研究拟检测侵袭性与非侵袭性垂体瘤中前述三个促肿瘤病毒(HPV16,HSV1以及HHV6B)的感染情况,探讨病毒感染与垂体瘤侵袭、增殖之间的关系。并且在体外垂体瘤细胞系中,探索病毒作用的分子机制,为临床上预估、治疗侵袭性垂体瘤提供新的思路。方法:1.利用免疫组织化学、巢式PCR等技术,研究HPV16、HSV1、HHV6B DNA、病毒蛋白在垂体瘤病人病理标本中的表达。2.利用qRT-PCR以及免疫组织化学的方法检测垂体瘤病人病理标本中TLR3 mRNA以及蛋白水平的表达。3.利用大鼠垂体瘤细胞系GH3细胞系在体外探究TLR3对细胞侵袭、增殖能力的影响以及分子机制探究。结果:1. HPV16和HHV6B在侵袭性垂体瘤标本中感染率更高60例垂体瘤标本中,HPV16在侵袭性垂体瘤阳性检测率为70%,非侵袭性垂体瘤阳性检测率为26.67%,侵袭性垂体瘤组中HPV 16的阳性检测率显著高于非侵袭性组(P0.01); HHV6B在侵袭性垂体瘤中的阳性检测率为55.33%,在非侵袭性垂体瘤中阳性检测率为23.33%,两者之间差异显著(P0.05); HSV1在侵袭性垂体瘤的检出率为50%,非侵袭性垂体瘤检出率为30%,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。因此,HPV16、HHV6B感染与垂体瘤的侵袭性正相关,而HSV1的感染与垂体瘤侵袭性无关。2. TLR3的mRNA与蛋白在侵袭组中表达均显著高于非侵袭性PA组,且与HPV16、HHV6B感染率正相关。在mRNA水平上,我们检测了侵袭性垂体瘤组与非侵袭性垂体瘤组中与病毒感染相关的TLRs中的TLR3、4、7、8、9的表达,我们的结果发现,仅TLR3在侵袭性与非侵袭性组之间有差异(P0.01)。在侵袭组中,TLR3在mRNA水平上表达增加。紧接着,我们又用免疫组化的方法检测了 TLR3蛋白水平的表达。TLR3的蛋白在每一例垂体瘤患者标本中均检测出有表达,且TLR3表达在胞浆。通过对TLR3蛋白表达的定量统计,我们发现TLR3蛋白水平在侵袭性组显著高于非侵袭性组(P0.01)。通过统计学方法分析TLR3表达量与HPV16、HHV6B感染率之间的关系,我们发现病毒感染率与TLR3表达之间呈正相关。3. TLR3的激活可促进垂体瘤细胞系GH3的增殖我们在8个时间点上检测了 200 μg/ml Poly (I:C)对GH3细胞系的影响。生长曲线结果显示,在分析的时间点内,Poly (I:C)可以促进GH3细胞的增殖。4. TLR3的激活可影响GH3细胞系的凋亡与细胞周期Poly (I:C)处理组与对照组对比可以发现,处理组中更少的凋亡细胞,更多的细胞处于细胞周期的S期。抗凋亡的Bcl-2在Poly (I:C)处理组中表达增加,促凋亡剪切活化的Caspase 3在添加Poly (I:C)组中的表达更少。而促进凋亡的Bax蛋白在几个处理组之间差异无统计学意义。与此同时,我们检测了促进细胞从G1/G0期进入S期的蛋白CyclinD1,我们发现,CyclinD1的表达在Poly(I:C)处理组中增多。5. TLR3的激活可促进GH3细胞的侵袭在预先TLR3-siRNA预处理或未处理的Transwell上室中,加入Poly(I:C)。48小时后,侵袭的细胞被染色和计数。统计分析显示,Poly(I:C)处理组穿过上室的细胞更多。6. TLR3下游的NF-κB被激活我们运用免疫荧光的方法检测了 Poly (I:C)刺激后NF-κB p65亚基的亚细胞定位。不仅如此,我们还分别检测了 p65分别在细胞浆、核中的表达水平。在Poly (I:C)刺激24小时后,更多的p65转移到了细胞核内,同时p65蛋白的表达水平在核内也是高于胞浆。7. Poly (I:C)刺激GH3后,下游肿瘤侵袭相关蛋白与炎症因子的分泌增加。我们发现,GH3在Poly(I:C)刺激后MMP9表达的增加,与体外研究一致,我们发现在人侵袭性PA病理标本中MMP9的表达水平高于非侵袭性组。NF-κB的激活可导致某些炎症因子的分泌。Poly(I:C)刺激GH3细胞后,可导致下游NF-κB的激活。因此我们检测了 NF-κB转录调控的炎症因子IL-6, IL-1β与TNFα,三者在Poly (I:C)干扰组中分泌均上调。结论:1.HPV16, HHV6B的感染率与垂体瘤的侵袭、增殖正相关。2. TLR3在侵袭性垂体瘤中表达更高。3.在垂体瘤标本中,TLR3的表达与HPV16, HHV6B的感染率呈正相关。4.通过病毒类似物Poly (I:C)激活TLR3信号通路可促进大鼠垂体瘤细胞系GH3的增殖与侵袭。5. NF-κB的激活及其下游调控的炎症因子IL-6、IL-1β、TNF-α与MMP9亦参与促进GH3细胞系的增殖和侵袭。
[Abstract]:Background and purpose: pituitary adenomas account for about 15%[1] of intracranial tumors, and their histology is benign, but 25-55% pituitary tumors are infiltrated around the surrounding structures, such as the osseous tissue of the sellar septum, ethmoid sinus and / or cavernous sinus, which are known as invasive pituitary tumor [2][3][4]. pituitary tumor invasiveness and high Ki-67 index, and with severe symptoms, more Poor prognosis, high recurrence rate, and low responsiveness related [5]. studies in drug replacement therapy have shown that chromosomes, genes (such as 11p/q, p53), adhesion molecules (such as: E-cadherin), metal matrix proteins (such as MMP2, MMP8), abnormal changes in inflammatory factors (such as IL-6, IL-17), and the progression of pituitary adenomas, and the invasion of [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, the assessment of its invasive specific histology and molecular biological standards is still lacking. Not only that, the existing studies have explored the invasiveness of the pituitary tumor at several levels, such as its own genes, transcriptional, posttranscriptional modifications, and so on, and rarely study the pituitary tumor focusing on the external environment, such as microbiological infection. Human tumors that affect the development of.15-20% are an important mechanism for the tumor - related [12]. - promoting oncology promoting the development of tumors. Chronic infections often lead to oxidative stress and inflammation, and the infected cells secrete inflammatory factors such as IL-1 beta, IL-6 and TNF- a, and form the inflammatory environment (inflammatory milieu), inflammatory stimuli, and effects. The activation of NF- kappa B, STAT3 and MAPKs signaling pathway promotes tumor development in recent years. It has been found that the pattern recognition receptor (PRRs) is not only expressed in immune cells, but also the most common [14].PRRs in the tumor cells is the Toll like receptor (TLR) family, and a number of members of the family such as TLR2[15], TLR3[16], TLR4[15][17] and so on have been confirmed. It is expressed in some tumors and participates in the occurrence and development of the tumor. The most closely related to the virus infection is TLR3. RNA (dsRNA). The source of the necrotic cells or the associated RNA and the synthesized Poly (I:C) [18][19] are the ligands of TLR3. The dsRNA activable TLR3 formed during the bi-directional transformation of the virus is the type of the virus. A large number of studies (DNA virus, RNA virus, etc.) not related to [20]. have shown that high risk HPV16 has been found to be associated with a variety of human tumors, including cervical cancer [21], oropharyngeal cancer [22], anal cancer [23], and head and neck cancer [24] and so on. Not only so, the HPV16 positive tumor cells in some tumors can be more invasive to the surrounding structures, as well as more distant migration. [21].HHV6 is a B lymphocytic virus, which is closely related to the prognosis of patients with children's lymphoma, while HSV1 is associated with the overall survival of patients with breast cancer, and it is associated with smoking, drinking, HPV infection and other factors that determine the occurrence of [26][27]. in the pituitary tumor, which has not been reported to be associated with a certain viral infection. This study is intended to detect the infection of three HPV16, HSV1, and HHV6B in invasive and non invasive pituitary adenomas and to explore the relationship between viral infection and the invasion and proliferation of pituitary adenomas. In vitro, the molecular mechanism of the action of the virus is explored to provide a clinical prediction for the treatment of invasive pituitary tumors. New ideas. Methods: 1. using immunohistochemistry, nested PCR and other techniques, the expression of HPV16, HSV1, HHV6B DNA, the expression of viral protein in the pathological specimens of pituitary tumor patients,.2. using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemical method to detect the expression of TLR3 mRNA and protein level in the pathological specimens of pituitary tumor patients,.3. using rat pituitary tumor cells. The GH3 cell line was used to explore in vitro the effect of TLR3 on cell invasion, proliferation and molecular mechanisms. Results: 1. HPV16 and HHV6B had higher infection rates in invasive pituitary tumor specimens, the positive detection rate of HPV16 in invasive pituitary tumor was 70%, the positive detection rate of non invasive pituitary tumor was 26.67%, invasive hypophysis. The positive detection rate of HPV 16 in the tumor group was significantly higher than that in the non invasive group (P0.01), the positive detection rate of HHV6B in invasive pituitary tumor was 55.33%, the positive detection rate in non invasive pituitary tumor was 23.33%, the difference was significant (P0.05), the detection rate of HSV1 in invasive pituitary tumor was 50%, and the detection rate of non-invasive pituitary tumor was 30%, the difference was 30%. There was no statistical significance (P0.05). Therefore, HPV16, HHV6B infection was positively related to the invasiveness of pituitary adenomas, while HSV1 infection and pituitary tumor invasiveness were not related to the.2. TLR3 mRNA and protein expression in the invasive group significantly higher than that in the non invasive PA group, and was positively related to the HPV16, HHV6B infection rate. In mRNA level, we detected invasive pituitary tumor groups and in the group of invasive pituitary adenomas. The expression of TLR3,4,7,8,9 in TLRs associated with virus infection in the non invasive pituitary tumor group, our results showed that only TLR3 was different between the invasive and non invasive groups (P0.01). In the invasive group, the expression of TLR3 was increased at the level of mRNA. Then, we also detected the expression of.TLR3 in the TLR3 protein level by immunohistochemical method. The protein was detected in every patient with pituitary adenoma, and TLR3 was expressed in the cytoplasm. By quantitative analysis of the expression of TLR3 protein, we found that the level of TLR3 protein was significantly higher in the invasive group than in the non invasive group (P0.01). The relationship between the expression of TLR3 and the rate of HPV16 and HHV6B infection was analyzed by statistical method, and we found that the relationship between the expression of TLR3 and the rate of HHV6B infection was analyzed. The positive correlation between the virus infection rate and the expression of TLR3.3. TLR3 activates the proliferation of the pituitary tumor cell line GH3. We detected the effect of 200 mu g/ml Poly (I:C) on the GH3 cell line at 8 time points. The growth curve shows that in the time point of analysis, Poly (I:C) can promote the activation of GH3 cell proliferation.4.. The apoptosis of the GH3 cell line and the cell cycle Poly (I:C) treatment group and the control group were found to be less apoptotic cells in the treatment group and more cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. The expression of anti apoptotic Bcl-2 in the Poly (I:C) treatment group increased, and the expression of Caspase 3 promoting apoptotic shear activation was less in the addition of Poly (I:C) group. There was no statistical difference between the apoptotic Bax protein in several treatment groups. At the same time, we detected the protein CyclinD1 that promoted the cell to enter S phase from the G1/G0 phase. We found that the expression of CyclinD1 in the Poly (I:C) treatment group was increased by the activation of.5. TLR3, which could promote the invasion of GH3 cells in pre TLR3-siRNA preconditioning or untreated Tra. In the upper chamber of nswell, the cells that were attacked were stained and counted after the addition of Poly (I:C).48 hours. Statistical analysis showed that the NF- kappa B of the Poly (I:C) treatment group passing through the cells of the upper chamber more downstream of.6. TLR3 was activated and we detected the subcellular localization of the Poly (I:C) stimulation by the immunofluorescence method. The expression level of p65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus was detected. After 24 hours of Poly (I:C) stimulation, more p65 was transferred into the nucleus, and the expression level of p65 protein was also higher than that of.7. Poly (I:C) stimulated GH3 in the nucleus, and the secretion of the downstream tumor invasion related proteins and inflammatory factors increased. We found that GH3 was in Poly (I:C). The increase of MMP9 expression after excitation is consistent with the in vitro study. We found that the expression level of MMP9 in human invasive PA pathological specimens is higher than the activation of.NF- kappa B in the non invasive group, which leads to the secretion of.Poly (I:C) stimulated GH3 cells by some inflammatory factors, which can lead to the activation of the downstream NF- kappa B. Therefore, we detected the inflammatory factors of NF- kappa B transcriptional regulation. IL-6, IL-1 beta and TNF alpha, three in the Poly (I:C) interference group all up regulation. Conclusion: 1.HPV16, the infection rate of HHV6B and the invasion of pituitary tumor, the proliferation of.2. TLR3 in invasive pituitary tumor is higher.3. in the pituitary tumor specimens, TLR3 expression is positively correlated with the infection rate of HPV16, TLR3 signaling pathway can promote the proliferation of rat pituitary tumor cell line GH3 and the activation of.5. NF- kappa B and its downstream regulation of the inflammatory factor IL-6. IL-1 beta, TNF- A and MMP9 also participate in promoting the proliferation and invasion of the GH3 cell line.

【学位授予单位】:第三军医大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R736.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郗崇利;垂体瘤12例误诊分析[J];中国综合临床;2000年11期

2 张秀卿;垂体瘤20例误诊分析[J];河南实用神经疾病杂志;2000年03期

3 张新伟,孙晓明,石静曦,刘永泽;垂体瘤并发慢性粒细胞白血病一例[J];中华血液学杂志;2003年07期

4 胡连升;复发垂体瘤的治疗探讨[J];中国冶金工业医学杂志;2004年01期

5 林旭妍;林绿标;;原发性视神经萎缩在垂体瘤诊断中的意义[J];实用医学杂志;2006年12期

6 郎黎薇;;应用健康咨询理论辅导垂体瘤术后病人1例[J];护理研究;2007年01期

7 石兰;;垂体瘤术后并发血栓性血小板减少性紫癜[J];中国民康医学;2008年16期

8 陈会平;;磁共振成像对垂体瘤的诊断价值[J];实用医技杂志;2013年01期

9 焦德让;垂体瘤出血[J];中国神经精神疾病杂志;1984年06期

10 高允中;垂体卒中[J];国外医学.内分泌学分册;1985年01期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 陈刚;卓雅芬;黄惠彬;林丽香;姚瑾;;垂体瘤239例临床分析[A];中华医学会第12次全国内科学术会议论文汇编[C];2009年

2 刘元钦;张荣伟;;垂体瘤复发的诊断治疗及疗效评价[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

3 宫安静;李洛;;垂体瘤病人手术前后激素应用探讨[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年

4 毛季萍;杨开初;;65例垂体瘤临床分析[A];中华医学会第六次全国内分泌学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年

5 邢月明;赵新萍;宋翔;吴伟;黄柏;;伽玛刀合并钴-60治疗垂体瘤的研究[A];山西省抗癌协会第六届肿瘤学术交流会论文汇编[C];2003年

6 钱伟;黄润生;房景玉;;伽玛刀治疗功能性垂体瘤初步报告[A];2006年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年

7 郎黎薇;;应用健康咨询理论辅导垂体瘤术后的病人[A];全国第三届重症监护护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2006年

8 张新文;金心;刘汉江;吴晔;贺军华;;影响垂体瘤质地的相关因素分析[A];2011年浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年

9 陈晓媛;张秀娟;;垂体瘤并发糖尿病酮症酸中毒1例[A];中华医学会第十一次全国内分泌学学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年

10 谷卫;;垂体瘤术前诊断与术后治疗[A];浙江省医学会神经外科学习班论文集[C];2012年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 原颖 段文利;垂体瘤不是少见病[N];健康报;2006年

2 余丹菁;垂体瘤须早治[N];家庭医生报;2007年

3 林湘艳;两项检查戳穿垂体瘤“伪装”[N];保健时报;2009年

4 本报记者 慕欣;垂体瘤,并非罕见病[N];医药经济报;2010年

5 刘伟国;巧用内窥镜 摘取垂体瘤[N];健康报;2006年

6 张天锡;治疗垂体瘤应尽早开刀[N];家庭医生报;2008年

7 北京三博复兴脑科医院 张宏伟;男性垂体瘤莫耽误治疗[N];光明日报;2006年

8 健康时报记者  白轶南;垂体瘤症状容易被忽视[N];健康时报;2006年

9 健康时报特约专家 李文良 王鹏;早期垂体瘤治疗易延误[N];健康时报;2006年

10 刘伟国;巧用内窥镜摘除垂体瘤[N];家庭医生报;2006年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 郑新;Toll样受体3介导病毒促进垂体瘤增殖侵袭的机制研究[D];第三军医大学;2016年

2 何心;垂体促肾上腺皮质激素腺瘤与免疫系统功能关系的研究[D];北京协和医学院;2016年

3 张靖;NEDD4-1、PTEN在垂体瘤中的表达及作用的研究[D];山东大学;2014年

4 胡吉;垂体瘤组织基因表达谱及发病机制研究[D];复旦大学;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 王清;常规细胞遗传学和荧光原位杂交技术在垂体瘤遗传学的研究[D];苏州大学;2002年

2 敖京生;生长抑素受体亚型在垂体瘤中的表达[D];北京协和医学院;2011年

3 严海燕;光学相干断层扫描仪在垂体瘤中的应用研究[D];南京医科大学;2009年

4 刘春生;垂体瘤质地的术前评估和多因素分析[D];山西医科大学;2011年

5 卓雅芬;垂体瘤239例临床分析[D];福建医科大学;2009年

6 安娟姬;多巴胺D2受体在垂体瘤细胞凋亡中的作用[D];延边大学;2002年

7 沈圆圆;鞍区非垂体瘤病变的鉴别诊断[D];浙江大学;2011年

8 张春泳;垂体瘤中VEGF和NFKBp65的表达及肿瘤分子生物学相关的免疫组织学研究[D];青岛大学;2005年

9 李旭;胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)在不同类型脑肿瘤患者血清中表达水平的研究[D];天津医科大学;2012年

10 云云;Toll样受体3介导呼吸道合胞病毒感染的炎症反应[D];安徽医科大学;2007年



本文编号:1875178

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/1875178.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户203fd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com