当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

膀胱部分切除术和根治性切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的回顾性分析

发布时间:2018-05-16 11:06

  本文选题:膀胱部分切除术 + 根治性膀胱切除术 ; 参考:《济南大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的比较膀胱部分切除术和根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的临床疗效,探讨膀胱部分切除术在肌层浸润性膀胱尿路上皮癌中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2002年1月-2012年1月山东大学附属山东省肿瘤医院泌尿外科收治的126例肌层浸润性膀胱癌(T2-T3)患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同,分为膀胱部分切除术组(A组)和根治性膀胱切除组(B组),统计分析两组患者住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、1年生存率、3年生存率、5年生存率、患者术后生活质量,及T2、T3期膀胱癌患者部分切除与根治性切除术后1年生存率、3年生存率、5年生存率,以评价膀胱部分切除术在肌层浸润性膀胱癌中的治疗效果。结果共入组126例,其中A组62例,其中男性55例,女性7例,低级别尿路上皮癌13例,高级别尿路上皮癌49例,年龄在38-75岁之间;B组64例,其中男性51例,女性13例,其中低级别尿路上皮癌14例,高级别尿路上皮癌50例,年龄在36-75岁之间。A组患者术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是90.32%,67.74%,46.77%,B组患者术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是89.06%,82.81%,65.63%;两者术后3、5年生存率差异有统计学意义(根治手术组优于部分切除术)。T2期患者行膀胱部分切除术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是87.50%,81.25%,62.50%,行膀胱根治性切除术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是91.67%,87.50%,70.83%,两者之间差异均无统计学意义,但膀胱部分切除术手术时间短、出血量少、住院时间短,并且患者生活质量明显优于根治术者。T3期患者行膀胱部分切除术联合术后化疗术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是93.33%,53.33%,30.00%,行膀胱根治性切除术后1年、3年、5年生存率分别是87.50%,80.00%,62.50%,两者术后3、5年生存率差异有统计学意义。结论1.对于T2期膀胱癌患者,膀胱部分切除术1、3、5年生存率与根治术无差异,但其手术时间短、出血量少、住院时间短,并且患者生活质量明显优于根治术,膀胱部分切除术是可选择的术式;2.对于T3膀胱癌,根治性手术3年、5年生存率高于膀胱部分切除术。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical efficacy of partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in the treatment of myometrial invasive bladder cancer and to explore the value of partial cystectomy in the treatment of myometrial invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma. Methods the clinical data of 126 patients with intramuscular invasive bladder cancer (T2-T3) treated in Department of Urology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University from January 2002 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Two groups were divided into two groups: partial cystectomy group (group A) and radical cystectomy group (group B). The hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, 1 year survival rate, 3 year survival rate, 5 year survival rate and postoperative quality of life were statistically analyzed. In order to evaluate the therapeutic effect of partial cystectomy on invasive bladder cancer, 1 year survival rate, 3 year survival rate and 5 year survival rate after partial resection and radical resection were evaluated. Results there were 126 cases in group A, including 55 males, 7 females, 13 cases of low grade urothelial carcinoma, 49 cases of high grade urothelial carcinoma, 64 cases of group B aged between 38 and 75 years, including 51 males and 13 females. Among them, there were 14 cases of low grade urothelial carcinoma and 50 cases of high grade urothelial carcinoma. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates of patients in group A aged between 36 and 75 years were 90.32 and 67.74and 46.77 respectively. The survival rates of group B were 82.81% and 65.63%, respectively, and the survival rates of group B were significantly higher than those of group B (radical operation group was better than group B). The 1 year, 3 year and 5 year survival rates of partial cystectomy were 87.50% and 81.25% respectively after partial cystectomy. The survival rates of 1 year, 3 year and 5 year after radical cystectomy were 91.67%, 87.50% and 70.83%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. However, partial cystectomy had shorter operative time, less bleeding, and shorter hospital stay. And the quality of life of the patients with stage T3 was significantly better than that of the patients undergoing partial cystectomy combined with postoperative chemotherapy. The survival rates for 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after radical cystectomy were 93.33 and 53.33 respectively. The survival rates of 1, 3 and 5 years after radical cystectomy were respectively 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion 1. For patients with stage T2 bladder cancer, there was no difference in the survival rate of 1 and 5 years between partial cystectomy and radical resection, but the operation time was short, the amount of bleeding was less, the hospitalization time was short, and the quality of life of the patients was obviously better than that of radical surgery. Partial cystectomy is an optional procedure. For T 3 bladder cancer, the 5-year survival rate of radical surgery was higher than that of partial cystectomy.
【学位授予单位】:济南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R737.14

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏晓松;庄乾元;胡志全;刘征;王志华;李凡;杨欢;WANG Shao-gang;;机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放、腹腔镜下膀胱根治性切除及Bricker回肠膀胱术比较分析[J];现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志;2016年02期

2 陈思;李剑峰;麦惠洪;;膀胱部分切除术在肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的价值[J];中国医药科学;2016年05期

3 李刚;李庆文;;膀胱部分切除术与根治性膀胱切除术治疗T_2M_0N_0期膀胱癌的疗效比较[J];蚌埠医学院学报;2016年03期

4 张劲松;李炯明;刘建和;陈戬;李晓涛;姜永明;郭海翔;王光;张海燕;海冰;;保留前列腺的根治性膀胱切除治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的适应症[J];昆明医科大学学报;2015年12期

5 王乾;曹敬毅;王淇超;吴刚;;肌层浸润性膀胱癌保留膀胱术后髂内动脉灌注化疗的临床疗效[J];肿瘤防治研究;2015年08期

6 胡映秋;王晓荣;谢梅茂;赵雁;王忠军;徐美玲;;吡柔比星与吉西他滨膀胱灌注化疗治疗膀胱癌的疗效比较[J];现代肿瘤医学;2015年17期

7 穆中一;李刚;栾雪;刘世博;陈昂;付成;胡滨;;经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术穿孔相关危险因素分析[J];现代泌尿外科杂志;2015年06期

8 曾蜀雄;张振声;宋瑞祥;于晓雯;鲁欣;李惠珍;陈新;马重;赵俊杰;孙颖浩;许传亮;;腹腔镜下与开放式根治性膀胱切除术后早期并发症的对比研究[J];中华泌尿外科杂志;2015年05期

9 王承承;孙晓玲;吴长利;;经尿道电切术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效分析[J];天津医药;2014年11期

10 张国辉;王金萍;郑清友;李志辉;关亚伟;张勇;朱立夏;;肌层浸润性膀胱癌保留膀胱手术后不同辅助治疗方法的疗效评价[J];现代泌尿外科杂志;2013年06期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 李超;经尿道绿激光膀胱肿瘤切除术与TURBT治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤的临床疗效比较[D];山东大学;2015年

2 曹匡纬;经尿道电切术与2微米激光切除术治疗浅表性膀胱癌的对比研究[D];第三军医大学;2015年



本文编号:1896586

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/1896586.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户de40e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com