当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融治疗大肝癌的临床研究

发布时间:2018-05-27 11:41

  本文选题:经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞 + 微波消融 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:通过对比观察经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合微波消融(MWA)与单纯经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗大肝癌的近期疗效和不良反应,评价经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融在大肝癌治疗中的近期临床疗效与安全性。方法:收集青岛大学附属医院2013年1月1日至2014年11月30日就诊的大肝癌患者68例,其中男61例,女7例,年龄38?74岁。根据治疗方式不同,分为联合组(36例)和对照组(32例),联合组经1?2次TACE治疗后2?4周内联合MWA治疗,对照组行2次以上TACE治疗,两组中AFP阳性患者分别为31例(86.1%)和26例(81.3%)。术后1月、3月、6月复查,而后每3?6个月复查,包括CE-CT、CE-MRI、肝功、甲胎蛋白(AFP),观察肿瘤大小、坏死情况及有无复发、转移等情况。接受治疗1个月后根据影像检查评价两组患者的近期疗效。记录不良反应和并发症发生情况、治疗次数以及患者生存时间,通过统计学软件进行对比分析。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、Child-Pugh分级、病灶数目、最大长径、AFP阳性率方面无明显差异(P0.05)。联合组及对照组分别平均治疗3.6±1.2次、4.9±1.8次,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。联合组CR 20例(55.6%)、PR 10例(27.8%)、SD 2例(5.6%)、PD 4例(11.1%)、RR 30例(83.3%),对照组CR 8例(25%)、PR 8例(25%)、SD 4例(12.5%)、PD 12例(37.5%)、RR 16例(50%),联合组完全缓解率(CR)、疾病控制率(RR)及术后AFP转阴率均明显优于对照组(P0.05)。联合组与对照组的生存期分别为17.5±6.32个月和13.25±6.73个月,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。联合组与对照组中位生存期分别为19个月和12个月,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。联合组在12、18、24月的患者生存率优于对照组(P0.05)。联合组肩胛部酸痛、肝区疼痛的发生率明显高于对照组(P0.05),两组患者低热等不良反应和严重并发症的发生率无明显差异(P0.05)。两组均未出现术中死亡病例。结论:TACE联合MWA治疗大肝癌较单纯TACE治疗手术次数减少,创伤小,近期疗效确切,安全性高,是大肝癌的有效治疗模式,具有临床推广价值。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the short-term efficacy and adverse reactions of transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACEE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation in the treatment of large liver cancer. Methods: a total of 68 patients with large liver cancer from January 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014, including 61 males and 7 females, aged 38 to 74 years, were collected from affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. According to the different ways of treatment, they were divided into two groups: the combined group (36 cases) and the control group (32 cases). The combined group was treated with MWA within 2 weeks after two TACE treatments. The control group received more than 2 times of TACE treatment. 31 cases of AFP positive patients in the two groups were treated with TACE. 1 month, 3 months, 6 months after operation, then every 36 months, including CE-CTT CE-MRI, liver function, AFP, tumor size, necrosis, recurrence, metastasis and so on. One month after treatment, the short-term efficacy of the two groups was evaluated according to imaging examination. Adverse reactions and complications, times of treatment and survival time of patients were recorded and analyzed by statistical software. Results: there was no significant difference in age, sex, Child-Pugh grade, number of lesions and AFP positive rate of the maximum length of diameter between the two groups (P 0.05). The combined group and the control group were treated with an average of 3.6 卤1.2 times and 4.9 卤1.8 times, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). In the combined group, there were 20 cases of PR with 55.6% PR and 2 cases of SD with SD of 5.66%. In the combined group, the complete remission rate, the disease control rate and the AFP negative conversion rate in the combined group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P 0.05) and the control group (n = 8). The total remission rate, the disease control rate and the AFP negative conversion rate in the combined group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P 0.05). The survival time of the combined group and the control group was 17.5 卤6.32 months and 13.25 卤6.73 months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The median survival time of the combined group and the control group was 19 months and 12 months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The survival rate of the combined group was better than that of the control group at 12 and 24 months (P 0.05). The incidence of scapular pain and liver pain in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as low fever and serious complications between the two groups. There were no cases of intraoperative death in both groups. Conclusion compared with TACE alone, the treatment of large liver cancer with MWA combined with 10% TACE has fewer surgical procedures, less trauma, better short-term curative effect and higher safety. It is an effective treatment mode for large liver cancer and has the value of clinical popularization.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735.7

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 武中林;谷铁树;康一鹤;李智岗;李顺宗;吴勇超;杨光;;精准TACE在原发性肝癌中的应用[J];实用放射学杂志;2016年06期

2 沈福军;;乙肝相关性肝癌抗病毒治疗临床研究[J];肝胆外科杂志;2016年02期

3 申文凤;冯志强;张洪义;李新慧;邹玉锋;肖梅;赵刚;;超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗高龄小肝癌疗效分析[J];中国医刊;2015年12期

4 沈立杰;严鹏;张娟娜;张会爽;徐坤鹏;;CT引导下氩氦冷冻、射频消融和微波消融治疗肝癌的疗效对比[J];医学影像学杂志;2015年10期

5 郭欢庆;闫鹏;邹常咏;李任飞;杨坡;;TACE联合微波消融治疗大肝癌的初步研究[J];实用放射学杂志;2015年10期

6 郑荣寿;左婷婷;曾红梅;张思维;陈万青;;中国肝癌死亡状况与生存分析[J];中华肿瘤杂志;2015年09期

7 张立洪;张传永;戴新征;郝保兵;张峰;;术后复发性小肝癌微波消融与再次手术切除的疗效比较[J];中华普通外科杂志;2015年08期

8 胡海;杨东均;王雪梅;孙清泉;杨汉丰;杜勇;;MRI评价肝癌热消融疗效的研究进展[J];放射学实践;2015年08期

9 曾云富;李玉伟;;肝动脉化疗栓塞联合局部消融治疗原发性肝癌的研究进展[J];西南军医;2015年04期

10 姚征;陈玉堂;郝伟远;罗君;曾晖;;经导管化疗栓塞联合经皮微波消融治疗中晚期肝癌临床分析[J];中华全科医学;2015年05期



本文编号:1941928

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/1941928.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c5e0d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com