S-TACE联合阿帕替尼对原发性肝癌疗效及其机制的研究
本文选题:原发性肝癌 + 超选择性肝肿瘤动脉化疗栓塞术 ; 参考:《延边大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的探讨S-TACE联合阿帕替尼治疗原发性肝癌患者血清和肝癌组织中血管生成因子的表达及其临床意义。方法收集我院2015年1月至2015年6月收治的原发性肝癌患者46例,分为单纯S-TACE组(A组,n=23)和S-TACE联合阿帕替尼组(B组,n=23)。检测所有患者治疗前、后血清VEGF、HIF-1α浓度及肝功能。部分患者(20例)经B超引导下穿刺活检获取肝肿瘤标本,采用免疫组化染色法检测术前及术后第4周肿瘤组织中VEGFR-2表达及MVD。根据46例患者术前及术后第4周肝脏CT增强扫描的肝内病灶变化,比较两组DCR及OR。观察与S-TACE及口服阿帕替尼相关不良反应的发生情况,随访3个月-2年,分析疾病进展情况。结果1.A、B两组术后第1周肝功能AST、ALT、TBIL及DBIL均较术前升高,具有统计学差异(P0.05),治疗后A、B组间比较不具有统计学差异。2.A组术后第1周、第4周血清VEGF、HIF-1α浓度与术前比较表现为先上升后下降;B组术后第1周、第4周血清VEGF、HIF-1α与术前比较呈持续下降,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。治疗后第4周组间比较;B组下降更明显,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。3.A、B两组术后第4周肝癌组织中VEGFR-2阳性表达率及MVD均低于术前,且B组下降更明显,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。4.A、B两组术后肿瘤直径均较术前缩小,治疗后A、B组间比较B组肿瘤缩小更显著,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。5.B组术后 4 周DCR为 95.65%、OR为 60.87%,A组DCR为 82.61%、OR为34.78%,B组虽然高于A组,但不具有统计学差异(P0.05)。6.B组的TTP为 11.72±4.94 月,A组TTP为 8.15±4.74 月,B组TTP长于A组,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。结论1.S-TACE联合阿帕替尼治疗肝癌疗效优于单纯S-TACE,其机制与抑制肿瘤的血管生成有关。2.S-TACE联合阿帕替尼可延长患者TTP,改善预后,提高生存。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the expression and clinical significance of angiogenic factor in serum and liver cancer tissues of patients with primary liver cancer treated with S-TACE combined with apatinib. Methods from January 2015 to June 2015, 46 patients with primary liver cancer were divided into two groups: S-TACE group (group A) and S-TACE group (group B) combined with Apatinib group (group B). The serum level of VEGF HIF-1 伪 and liver function were measured before and after treatment. Liver tumor specimens were obtained by B-ultrasound guided biopsy. The expression of VEGFR-2 and MVD were detected by immunohistochemical staining before and 4 weeks after operation. According to the changes of hepatic lesions in 46 patients before and 4 weeks after operation, DCR and ORs were compared between the two groups. The adverse reactions associated with S-TACE and oral apatinib were observed and followed up for 3 months to 2 years to analyze the progress of the disease. Results 1. The liver function of group A B was significantly higher than that of group A (P 0.05) at the 1st week after operation. There was no significant difference between group A and group A in the first week after operation. 2. There was no significant difference between group A and group A at the first week after operation, and there was no significant difference between group A and group A in the first week after operation (P < 0.05). At the 4th week, the serum level of VEGFU HIF-1 伪 increased at first and then decreased at the first week after operation. At the 4th week, the serum level of VEGFU HIF-1 伪 decreased continuously compared with that before operation, and there was a statistical difference between the two groups (P 0.05). The expression of VEGFR-2 and MVD in liver cancer tissues in group B were significantly lower than those in group B at the 4th week after treatment, and the decrease was more significant in group B than that in group B at the 4th week after treatment, and there was statistical difference between group B and group B (P 0.05. 3.) the positive expression rate of VEGFR-2 and MVD were significantly lower in group B than before operation. After treatment, the diameter of tumor in group A was significantly smaller than that in group B, and the DCR of group A was 95.65% (OR = 60.87) 4 weeks after treatment, although the DCR of group B was higher than that of group A (34.78%, P < 0.05), and that of group A was significantly lower than that of group B (P < 0.05), and that of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05), and that of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05), and that of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P < 0.05). However, the TTP of group A was 8.15 卤4.74 months longer than that of group A, and the TTP of group B was longer than that of group A (11.72 卤4.94 months, P < 0.05). Conclusion 1. The therapeutic effect of S-TACE combined with apatinib on liver cancer is better than that of S-TACE.The mechanism of S-TACE combined with Apatinib is related to the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. 2. S-TACE combined with apatitinine can prolong TTP, improve prognosis and improve survival. 2.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲁丁瑜;李娜;李志平;;多靶点抗肿瘤新药阿帕替尼的研究进展[J];华西药学杂志;2017年01期
2 樊斌;张家耀;张勇;李锦貌;李伟;;原发性肝细胞癌患者血清TATIP2/TIP30、RBBP4水平与临床病理的关系[J];检验医学与临床;2016年23期
3 吴会玲;宋希;;乙型肝炎病毒感染与肝癌相关性多因素研究[J];现代医药卫生;2016年22期
4 黎晓武;李金强;罗向波;侯琴;何珊;;血清GP73、HSP27联合AFP检测在HBV相关早期肝细胞癌诊断的价值[J];实用预防医学;2016年11期
5 何泽玲;曹建彪;范公忍;;热休克蛋白70在肝细胞癌中的表达及作用[J];临床肝胆病杂志;2016年11期
6 厉英超;米琛;薛挥;李伟之;李培杰;吕良山;;介入化疗栓塞治疗对原发性肝癌患者细胞免疫功能的影响[J];重庆医学;2016年31期
7 刘小龙;;液体活检在肝癌早期诊断与预后判断中的临床价值[J];泸州医学院学报;2016年05期
8 王铁征;臧运金;林栋栋;赵元顺;李宁;;甲胎蛋白及α-L-岩藻糖苷酶在乙肝相关肝癌诊断中的作用[J];中国医刊;2016年11期
9 张宁刚;王育生;;甲磺酸阿帕替尼片治疗原发性肝癌肺转移1例报道[J];肿瘤防治研究;2016年10期
10 黄述婧;姜菲菲;王颖;于艳华;娄金丽;;AFP与PIVKA-Ⅱ联合检测在原发性肝癌诊断中的应用研究[J];标记免疫分析与临床;2016年10期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 范莎莎;新的血清标志物HTATIP2/TIP30在肝癌诊断中的研究[D];南方医科大学;2014年
2 林岩;榄香烯注射液联合甲磺酸阿帕替尼抗肝癌的实验研究[D];南京中医药大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王欣;索拉菲尼联合TACE治疗晚期肝细胞肝癌的荟萃分析[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
2 滕凯;恩度联合肝动脉化疗栓塞后肝癌患者血清VEGF、HIF-1A、OPN、CTGF的动态变化[D];山东大学;2013年
,本文编号:2036910
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2036910.html