miR-218靶向调控HMGB1-RAGE通路抑制胶质瘤发生发展机制研究
[Abstract]:Background: glioma is the most common malignant tumor in the brain, characterized by rapid invasive growth and high postoperative recurrence. The 5 year survival rate of patients with low grade glioma (WHO WHO I and II) is about 30% to 70%, and the median survival period of high grade glioblastoma (IV grade) is 9 to 12 months. Therefore, it is necessary to determine this More biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for malignant diseases. Small RNA (microRNA, miRNA) involves a series of important biological processes, such as cell development, differentiation, apoptosis and proliferation. Abnormal mi RNA expression is related to the occurrence and progression of various tumors. In addition, the expression of the misaligned mi RNA can be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and evaluation of the prognosis. Objective: To study the differential expression of miRNA in different grade gliomas and to explore the molecular mechanism of miRNA regulation of glial development through target gene. Methods: (1) the differential expression of MI RNA was obtained by bioinformatics on the analysis of glioma data in NCBI GEO database, and 22 cases of glioma tissue were expressed through PCR Array (containing 184miRNA primers). The pre designed PCR chip was used to screen the differential expression of MI RNA in glioma, and to select the regulatory mechanism of MI RNA in glioma, and to predict the target gene of MI RNA by bioinformatics software. (2) 66 cases of glioma tissue specimens and 26 normal brain tissues were labeled. In this study, the expression of MI R-218 in normal brain tissue and glioma was detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR, and the expression and expression difference of miR-218 in different gliomas were analyzed. (3) a semi quantitative PCR was used to detect the level of HMGB1 and RAGE in different levels of glioma, and on this basis, the quantitative PCR to HMGB1 and RAGE based on the quantitative PCR The expression and expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in normal brain tissue and different grade gliomas were verified by the expression of the level in normal brain tissue and glioma. (4) the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in the protein level was detected by immunohistochemical method, and the positive cells in normal brain tissue and glioma were analyzed. Expression and expression difference, the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in normal brain tissue and glioma was detected by Western blot. (5) the clinical data of the patients were collected and followed up. The survival curves of the patients were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression, and the single variable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to examine each clinical trial. The effect of covariate and MI R-218, HMGB1, RAGE on the survival of patients with glioma. Results: (1) 11 miRNA (miR-22-3p, miR-363-3p, MI) were screened by PCR Array analysis of 22 glioma tissue specimens. 148A, MI R-93, miR-218-5p). Through the analysis of NCBI GEO data, we obtain miRNA 7 miRNA (miR-7, miR-10b, miR-20b, Fold Difference4) in glioma. 2) miR-218 was expressed in normal brain tissue and glioma, and the expression of MI R-218 in different gliomas was different. Compared with miR-218 expression in normal brain tissue, the expression of miR-218 expression and tumor grade presented inverse.MiR-218 in high grade (grade III and IV grade) glioma tissue, which was significantly lower than that of low grade (grade III and IV) glioma (grade III and IV). Grade I and II) (P0.01). (3) PCR, immunohistochemical staining and Western blot test showed that HMGB1, RAGE expression, HMGB1, RAGE expression were positively correlated with tumor grade in normal brain tissue specimens and different grade glioma tissue specimens. The expression of HMGB1, RAGE in high grade (grade III and IV grade) glioma tissues was expressed. Significantly higher than the low level (grade I and grade II) (P0.05). (4) the Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the survival time of the patients with low MI R-218 expression was significantly shorter than the high expression of MI R-218, the Kaplan-Meier curve showed HMGB1, and the survival time of the RAGE low expression group was longer than that of the high expression group. (5) the single factor analysis showed that the low expression of miR-218 and sex (p=0.013), the size of the tumor ( P=0.020), WHO grading (p0.001) and KPS score (p0.001) were significantly related, but not related to patient's age and degree of resection. (6) a single variable analysis of Cox regression showed the tumor size (p=0.018), WHO classification (p0.001), MI R-218 expression level (p0.001) as an independent correlation factor for the total survival time; tumor size, resection range, etc. P0.001, miR-218 expression (p0.001) is an independent prognostic factor of progression free survival time (PFS),.Cox regression multivariable analysis shows the expression of MI R-218 (HR=0.32; 95%CI 0.11,0.89; p=0.029). 001) is an independent prognostic factor of the total survival time (OS); the expression of miR-218 (HR=0.46; 95%CI 0.18,1.21; p=0.011), the range of the resection (HR=0.09; 95%CI 0.02,0.30; p0.001), the size of the tumor (HR=0.53; 95%CI), is an independent correlation factor of the progression free survival time. Y and bioinformatics screened the differential expression of miRNA-218 in glioma. The expression in glioma was down downward. Bioinformatics predicted HMGB1 in glioma and RAGE as a potential target gene for MI R-218. Experimental detection of MI R-218, HMGB1 and RAGE results showed that miR-218 could be used as a tumor suppressor in glioma; There is a negative correlation with the expression of HMGB1 and RAGE, and the low expression of MI R-218 and the high expression of HMGB1 and RAGE predict the poor prognosis of the patients with glioma, and miR-218 can inhibit the progression of glioma by regulating the expression of HMGB1-RAGE.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R739.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周志华;易良;卞修武;;胶质瘤干细胞研究进展[J];中华病理学杂志;2007年03期
2 徐俊杰;于洪泉;国巍;赵伟;金宏;温娜;齐玲;;西兰花多肽对大鼠C6胶质瘤细胞生长的影响[J];中风与神经疾病杂志;2012年11期
3 徐俊杰;于洪泉;赵伟;金宏;温娜;齐玲;刘兴吉;;西兰花多肽对C6胶质瘤细胞的诱导凋亡作用[J];吉林大学学报(医学版);2013年01期
4 仝海波,江澄川,唐镇生,金一尊;胶质瘤细胞化学增敏作用实验研究[J];山西临床医药;2000年07期
5 李嗍,王枫,缪珊,骆文静;过量锌对鼠胶质瘤细胞体外生长的影响[J];解放军预防医学杂志;2001年04期
6 梁一鸣,郭国庆,郑少俊,沈伟哉;胶质瘤血管内皮生长因子表达的调节[J];临床与实验病理学杂志;2001年02期
7 曲元明,韩韬,李桂林,王成伟;血管内皮细胞生长因子抗体对胶质瘤生长的影响[J];山东医科大学学报;2001年02期
8 黄强,董军;胶质瘤的分子外科治疗[J];中国微侵袭神经外科杂志;2001年04期
9 叶明,周岱,周幽心,王玮,傅建新,黄煜伦;血管内皮生长因子在胶质瘤中的表达[J];肿瘤;2002年06期
10 顾宇翔,陈衔城,王宇倩;胶质瘤对亲细胞非均质分子脂质和几种药物敏感性的比较[J];复旦学报(医学版);2003年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李飞;李梅;卢佳友;朱刚;林江凯;孟辉;吴南;陈志;冯华;;脂质微区干扰剂甲基-β-环糊精影响C6胶质瘤细胞侵袭和迁移的体外实验研究[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第四届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2009年
2 吴安华;王运杰;Ohlfest JR;Wei Chen;Low WC;;胶质瘤的生物治疗-从实验室到临床[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
3 徐宏;韩杨云;孙中书;李新军;;与胶质瘤代谢通路相关的候选基因筛选[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 潘冬生;;多基因修饰胶质瘤细胞疫苗的抗肿瘤免疫反应[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第六届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2011年
5 俞文华;车志豪;张祖勇;许培源;陆镛民;傅林;朱强;陈锋;杜权;;骨桥蛋白在胶质瘤细胞中的表达及其信号传导途径[A];2005年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
6 张震;徐克;;低强度超声诱导C6胶质瘤细胞凋亡的体外实验研究[A];中华医学会第十三次全国超声医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2013年
7 蒋伟峰;高方友;尹浩;;白细胞介素-17及其受体在胶质瘤中的表达及临床意义[A];2013年贵州省神经外科年会论文集[C];2013年
8 徐庆生;张小兵;周永庆;;胶质瘤干细胞及其放疗敏感性[A];2011年浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
9 杨孔宾;赵世光;刘炳学;陈晓丰;戴钦舜;;K~+通道阻断剂四乙胺对大鼠胶质瘤细胞的增殖和凋亡影响[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第四届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2009年
10 黄强;;胶质瘤生成细胞研究[A];第三届中国肿瘤学术大会教育论文集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 衣晓峰 冯宇曦;中药三氧化二砷有望成为治疗胶质瘤新药[N];中国医药报;2011年
2 记者 匡远深;让胶质瘤干细胞不再“繁殖”[N];健康报;2011年
3 张献怀 张文;瘤区埋雷 持续杀伤[N];健康报;2007年
4 白毅;人脑胶质瘤基础与应用研究喜结“九大硕果”[N];中国医药报;2006年
5 王德江;刘藏;王贵怀;曹勇;王新生;肖新如;交流最新进展 提高诊治水平[N];中国医药报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 董军;CUL4B在神经胶质细胞瘤中的作用研究[D];山东大学;2015年
2 张睿;循环miR-221/222在胶质瘤诊断与预后中的价值与基于CED的中枢神经系统给药新方法的研究[D];山东大学;2015年
3 许森林;ALDH1A1在胶质瘤侵袭和结直肠癌转移中的作用和机制[D];第三军医大学;2015年
4 王啸;靶向嵌段共聚物胶束在胶质瘤磁共振成像、药物输送及治疗的应用[D];安徽医科大学;2015年
5 廖红展;锌指转录因子SNAI2在miR-203的影响下通过上皮间质转化参与胶质瘤耐药机制的调节[D];南方医科大学;2015年
6 潘俊;IRG1促进胶质瘤增殖的作用机制及临床意义[D];南方医科大学;2015年
7 郑传宜;胶质瘤中GLUT3基因异常表达的意义及其相关调控机制[D];南方医科大学;2015年
8 徐红超;氩氦冷冻消融联合GM-CSF治疗胶质瘤小鼠的疗效及其对小鼠脾脏树突状细胞免疫功能影响[D];南方医科大学;2015年
9 黄素宁;TNFRSF6B在胶质瘤中的表达及对胶质瘤细胞增殖及凋亡的作用研究[D];南方医科大学;2015年
10 熊伟;GBE1在人脑胶质细胞瘤中的表达及干预实验研究[D];第四军医大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 牛亮;miR-218靶向调控HMGB1-RAGE通路抑制胶质瘤发生发展机制研究[D];兰州大学;2017年
2 张大庆;单核细胞趋化蛋白-1在骨髓间充质干细胞向胶质瘤细胞趋化中的作用研究[D];大连医科大学;2012年
3 黄俊龙;ADC值与胶质瘤Ki-67、MGMT的相关性研究[D];福建医科大学;2015年
4 李明聪;下调Pygo2对U251及U251起源的胶质瘤干细胞生物学特性的影响[D];福建医科大学;2015年
5 徐云峰;胶质瘤干细胞的3D培养及其核酸适体筛选的探索[D];福建医科大学;2015年
6 张静文;T细胞过继免疫治疗小鼠脑胶质瘤原位模型的研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
7 洪宇;胶质瘤瘤周水肿、病理级别、Ki-67表达三者相关性研究[D];石河子大学;2015年
8 姬云翔;磷酸化Cx43蛋白在人胶质瘤细胞中表达及其与肿瘤细胞增殖相关性研究[D];石河子大学;2015年
9 朱峰;OPN的异常表达与胶质瘤的相关性研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
10 刘兵;SENP1表达水平对人脑胶质瘤发生发展的作用机制及其相关性[D];河北医科大学;2015年
,本文编号:2124332
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2124332.html