GH型垂体腺瘤MRI、血内分泌激素与激素免疫组化特点及其相互关系的研究
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the relationship between MRI, serum endocrine hormones and hormone immunization points in patients with GH pituitary adenoma, and to reveal the mechanism of pathological immune response to the pathogenesis of GH pituitary adenoma. Methods the clinical data of 84 cases of GH pituitary adenoma removed by transsphenoidal microsurgery in June of January 2008 in our department were reviewed and analyzed. (1) the use of multiple fields. The tumor volume (V) was calculated by the formula method (xyz/2); the level of basal blood endocrine hormone before operation was measured by immunoluminescence. The dynamic measurement of blood growth hormone (GH) was carried out at 5 and 4 weeks after operation to find out the changes in the changes of GH before and after the operation, to find the time window to determine the remission standard of the tumor, and to detect the internal adenoma by immunohistochemical method. The expression of endocrine hormone immunoreaction and its relationship with the level of endocrine hormone, tumor biological behavior and tumor size were analyzed. (2) the difference of clinical data between secondary and non secondary diabetes patients with GH pituitary adenoma was compared and analyzed by two classification multiple factor Logistic regression analysis. The related factors of secondary diabetes in patients with type GH pituitary tumor. Results (1) there was no significant gender difference in pituitary adenoma in acromegalomattic symptoms, male: female =1:1, good for 41-50 year old middle-aged people, and the time of large onset of limb was concentrated in 6-10 years.GH pathological immune response mean light density (AOD) was higher than prolactin (PRL), promoting ovulation. Hormone (FSH), adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), luteinizing hormone (LH) (P =0.047,0.000,0.000,0.000), GH and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) had no significant difference (P=0.139), and the number of positive expressions of endocrine hormone immunoreaction was GH62 (74%), PRL36 (43%), TSH23 (27%), and the common expression type was G. H 23 cases (27%), GH+PRL 16 cases (19%), PRL+TSH 8 cases (10%); GH, PRL pathological immunological positive rate, blood hormone level increase rate and clinical manifestation positive rate were 74%, 99%, 100% and 43%, 15%, 10%, the difference was statistically significant (x2=27.024, P=0.000); TSH, ACTH, FSH, LH pathological immunological positive rates were respectively 27%, 18%, but clinical endocrine hormone determination, but clinical endocrine hormone determination, but clinical endocrine hormone determination, but clinical endocrine hormone determination, but clinical endocrine hormone determination, but clinical hormone determination but, but clinical endocrine hormone determination The difference between the 5 days and 4 weeks after operation was statistically significant (F=19.120, P=0.000), and GH[(11.64 + 5.83) ng/ml] and GH[(51.14 + 36.01) ng/ml] before the operation decreased rapidly after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.004), and the blood GH[(5.46 + 4.25) ng/ml] still continued to decline, but decreased at 4 weeks after the operation. There was a significant difference between the 5 days after the operation and the 5 days after the operation (P=0.011). (2) MRI showed that the tumor could break through the sellar diaphragm to the saddle, break through the saddle bottom to the sphenoidal sinus, and the infrasellar invasion index [(2.35 + 0.69) cm] was significantly higher than the suprasellar invasion index [(0.66 + 0.25) cm], t=16.128, P=0.000). There was no significant correlation between the tumor size [(35.06 + 26.68)] ng/ml] and the tumor size [(7.98 + 5.24) cm3]] and the AOD value of the tumor GH (0.395 + 0.383) (r=0.117, P=0.144; r=-0.076, P=0.555). The size of the tumor had no significant correlation with the AOD value of the GH immune response (r=-0.066, P=0.609). (3) secondary and non diabetic pituitary adenomas The blood GH was (42.83 + 8.70) ng/ml, (38.91 + 36.46) ng/ml (t=5.253, P=0.031), and the positive rate of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoreaction (70%) was more than that of those without secondary (14%) (x2=23.971, P=0.000). The statistical results of.Logistic regression analysis showed the onset time. The level of GH and TSH immunoreactive Exp and 0. were 0. and 0., respectively. 010,0.004,0.002, Exp (B) is the largest TSH immunoreactive. Conclusion (1) the MRI manifestations of GH pituitary adenoma have obvious tendency towards the first invasion of the sphenoidal sinus, which provides a reference for the diagnosis of the disease from the imaging diagnosis to the endocrinological function diagnosis. (2) the blood GH level of 4 weeks after the operation can be used as a time window for evaluating the effect of the surgical treatment. (3) GH type Pituitary adenoma GH, TSH immune expression intensity is higher than other endocrine hormones, GH, TSH, PRL immunoreactive number more than other endocrine hormones, GH, GH+PRL, PRL+TSH as the common pathological type of immune response, the tumor cells secreted TSH, PRL involved in the disease of patients with limb and physiology and physiology. (4) GH immune expression and blood endocrine hormone levels and levels The clinical manifestations were well consistent, but there was no significant correlation between the basic blood level of GH before operation, the intensity of pathological immune response and the size of the tumor. The relationship between the pathological immune response of GH type pituitary adenoma and the level of endocrine hormone and the imaging findings was interrelated and complex. (5) the time of the tumor and the blood GH water before the operation. The positive TSH immunoreaction is the related factor of secondary diabetes in GH type pituitary tumor. The immunoreactive TSH is the main factor. The TSH secreted by the tumor is involved in the pathophysiological process of the secondary diabetes of the GH pituitary tumor. The specific regulatory mechanism remains to be further studied. The development of the GH type pituitary tumor patients with TSH immunologically positive should be concerned with their development. For the possibility of diabetes mellitus, follow-up should be strengthened to pay attention to the possibility of its development into malignant tumors, so as to achieve the early detection and diagnosis of the disease.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R736.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 柴青芬,王晓琪,黄其鎏,郑卫权;底节区无功能嗜酸细胞性垂体腺瘤1例报告[J];第一军医大学学报;2000年01期
2 任祖渊;努力提高垂体腺瘤的诊断和治疗水平[J];中华神经外科杂志;2000年03期
3 汪三合;垂体腺瘤误诊为慢性单纯性青光眼1例原因浅析[J];山西临床医药;2000年10期
4 金许洪,金晨宇,朱惠军;垂体腺瘤术后的中西医治疗[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2000年23期
5 刘学键,李克雷,苏传富;垂体腺瘤33例误诊分析[J];职业与健康;2000年02期
6 魏新亭,罗世祺;垂体腺瘤p16基因启动子甲基化分析[J];河南实用神经疾病杂志;2001年04期
7 闫志钧,林志国,沈红,李庆国,隋立森,浦松;垂体腺瘤的X刀治疗[J];立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志;2001年04期
8 赵明,刘伟国,杨小锋;老年人垂体腺瘤的诊断与治疗[J];浙江创伤外科;2001年03期
9 马增路;垂体腺瘤误诊55例分析[J];中国综合临床;2002年06期
10 窦万臣,马超,王任直,任祖渊;复发性垂体腺瘤的诊断和治疗[J];中华神经外科杂志;2002年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 林志仁;程刚;;X线分次立体适形放疗垂体腺瘤35例[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 魏宇佳;;老年人垂体腺瘤临床特征及随诊分析[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
3 王树兴;李学芝;纪宇明;田维东;彭龙峰;姜京超;杨军;;老年人垂体腺瘤手术治疗(附30例临床分析)[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
4 王任直;;规范化治疗是提高垂体腺瘤诊治水平的关键[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会首届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2005年
5 潘红日;周开宇;金涌;王广涛;;经鼻蝶入路显微手术治疗垂体腺瘤[A];2005年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
6 傅伟明;龚江标;李谷;郑秀珏;杨小锋;刘伟国;;巨大垂体腺瘤分次手术治疗探讨[A];2007浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
7 牛焕江;王义荣;朱先理;杨树旭;孙伟军;臧国尧;李新伟;方兵;钱聪;甘海鹏;;微骨孔入路手术治疗垂体腺瘤疗效分析[A];2007浙江省神经外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
8 邹杰;冯正国;;垂体腺瘤的眼部改变和误诊分析[A];中国眼底病论坛·全国眼底病专题学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2008年
9 曾梅芳;蒋翠萍;赵雪兰;吴蔚;苗青;张琼月;黄杉;何敏;张烁;杨叶虹;李士其;赵耀;叶红英;李益明;;垂体腺瘤术后垂体前叶功能减退及替代治疗情况研究[A];中华医学会第十次全国内分泌学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
10 刘光耀;王宁;武玉刚;战华;孟祥喜;赵世光;;白细胞介素-18在人类垂体腺瘤组织中的表达及分布[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王任直;应用循证医学 诊治垂体腺瘤[N];健康报;2007年
2 刘桥斌 特约记者 林夕夕;大多垂体腺瘤不需治疗[N];健康时报;2007年
3 健康时报特约记者 朱丽丽;突然闭经排查垂体腺瘤[N];健康时报;2007年
4 本报记者 马艳红;规范治疗垂体腺瘤任务迫切[N];中国医药报;2006年
5 本报记者 钟思思;垂体腺瘤 找出病源防误诊[N];保健时报;2004年
6 ;脑垂体腺瘤表相在四肢躯干[N];北京日报;2006年
7 本报记者 李颖;身体变形 警惕垂体腺瘤[N];科技日报;2014年
8 高素英;垂体腺瘤高发不容忽视[N];中国医药报;2014年
9 李士其;老年人垂体腺瘤与微创手术治疗[N];中国中医药报;2004年
10 记者 匡远深 通讯员 赵晶晶;内镜加盟“搞定”垂体腺瘤[N];健康报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 徐艺文;5-羟甲基胞嘧啶在无功能垂体腺瘤中的变化及其调节机制研究[D];北京协和医学院;2016年
2 孔令胜;GH型垂体腺瘤MRI、血内分泌激素与激素免疫组化特点及其相互关系的研究[D];青岛大学;2016年
3 王珞;垂体促肾上腺皮质激素腺瘤全基因组测序分析[D];浙江大学;2015年
4 贾睿超;垂体腺瘤中NPY、miR-15a/miR-16和Bcl-2相关性研究[D];天津医科大学;2014年
5 马林;垂体腺瘤分子生物学特征和手术治疗的研究[D];天津医科大学;2006年
6 陈来照;神经肽Y及其受体在垂体腺瘤中的表达及意义[D];天津医科大学;2006年
7 夏学巍;过氧化物酶增殖物激活受体γ激动剂治疗垂体腺瘤的实验研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2005年
8 唐建建;骨桥蛋白与垂体腺瘤侵袭性的相关性研究[D];四川大学;2006年
9 黄垂学;过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ配体对垂体腺瘤生长的影响及其作用机制的研究[D];中南大学;2007年
10 李强;缺氧微环境对垂体腺瘤侵袭性变化的影响[D];中南大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘琦;基质金属蛋白酶和血管内皮生长因子表达与垂体腺瘤侵袭性关系的研究[D];苏州大学;2005年
2 王圣;侵袭性垂体腺瘤与非侵袭性垂体腺瘤中MicroRNAs的差异性表达的研究[D];南京大学;2014年
3 宁威海;264例垂体腺瘤患者临床资料的回顾性分析[D];首都医科大学;2016年
4 李全才;单鼻孔经鼻蝶垂体腺瘤内镜手术与显微镜手术疗效的对比研究[D];新疆医科大学;2016年
5 张华园;135例垂体腺瘤术后水钠紊乱影响因素分析[D];新疆医科大学;2016年
6 李哲;垂体腺瘤术后患者垂体前叶功能受损以及替代治疗情况分析[D];吉林大学;2016年
7 孟铭;伽玛刀与神经内镜下手术治疗垂体腺瘤患者术后生存质量分析[D];新疆医科大学;2016年
8 姚广明;巨大垂体腺瘤不同手术入路的疗效比较与综合治疗[D];吉林大学;2016年
9 林昆哲;鞍区病变患者神经垂体功能状态的临床评估[D];福建医科大学;2015年
10 邢惟慷;长链非编码RNA在无功能垂体腺瘤中的差异表达研究[D];苏州大学;2016年
,本文编号:2161460
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2161460.html