腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术在上皮性卵巢癌治疗中的意义
[Abstract]:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Ovarian malignancies are one of the three most common malignancies in female genital organs, with the highest mortality in gynecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type of ovarian malignancies. The principle of treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer is a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. 50% to 80% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer recurred after chemotherapy and the 5-year survival rate of patients with advanced ovarian cancer hovered between 30% and 40%. Pelvic lymph node metastasis rate was 5% - 14%, para-aortic lymph node metastasis rate was 4% - 12%; pelvic lymph node metastasis rate of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was more than 50%, para-aortic lymph node metastasis rate was 17%. But whether retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, especially para-aortic lymph node dissection, was necessary for epithelial ovarian cancer There is still controversy. According to the literature, only 10-30% of the patients with ovarian cancer in the world have undergone comprehensive staging surgery. Methods 1. The clinical and pathological data of 104 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-seven patients were treated with palpation and 67 patients were treated with pelvic and para-abdominal aortic lymph node dissection.The metastasis rates of pelvic and para-abdominal aortic lymph nodes and the distribution of metastatic para-abdominal aortic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian cancer were summarized. Relapse and survival rate, and single factor and multifactor analysis of the impact of epithelial ovarian cancer pelvic lymph node metastasis and para-abdominal aortic lymph node metastasis related factors. 2. Statistical methods SPSS21.0 software for statistical analysis, statistical data comparison using t test, statistical data comparison using x2 test, Kaplan-Meier method The survival rate was calculated by Log-rank test, and the unconditional logistic regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Results 1. Lymph node metastasis rate and related factors of lymph node metastasis: Of 104 cases, 46 cases had retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, and the metastasis rate was 44.23% (46/104). 41 cases had pelvic lymph node metastasis. Metastasis rate was 39.42% (41 / 104); para-aortic lymph node metastasis was found in 24 cases (35.82% (24 / 67); pelvic lymph node metastasis was found in 7 cases (10.45% (7 / 67); para-aortic lymph node metastasis was found in 5 cases (7.46%); pelvic lymph node metastasis was found in 19 cases (5 / 67). The metastasis rate was 28.36%(19/67). Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, pathological type and histological differentiation were risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical stage and pelvic lymph node metastasis were risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Results showed that clinical stage was an independent risk factor for pelvic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer, and pelvic lymph node metastasis was an independent risk factor for para-abdominal aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. The average number of lymph nodes resected in para-aortic lymph node dissection group was (19.56+6.14) and (39.55+15.59). With the enlargement of lymph node dissection range, the number of resected lymph nodes increased (P 0.05). The average number of positive lymph nodes in pelvic lymph node dissection group and pelvic+para-aortic lymph node dissection group were (9.09+4.63) and (9.09+4.63) respectively. With the enlargement of lymph node dissection range, the number of positive lymph node resection increased (P 0.05). 3. Prevalent area of multiple paraaortic lymph node metastasis: Level of left renal vein and para-abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava were the areas with the highest lymph node metastasis rate (42.31% (11/26). 4. Clinical stage and surgical-pathological stage The coincidence rate was 17.39% (8/46) in 8 cases with gross foci confined to the ovary or pelvic cavity. 5 cases underwent pelvic + abdominal paraaortic lymphadenectomy, 1 case had abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastasis, 4 cases had pelvic lymph node metastasis and 5 cases had left renal vein level lymph node metastasis. Metastasis. 5. Recurrence rate and tumor-free survival: 41 of 104 cases had recurrence, the total recurrence rate was 39.42%(41/104). The recurrence rates of lymph node metastasis and non-metastasis were 60.87%(28/46) and 22.41%(13/58), respectively. The recurrence rate of lymph node metastasis was higher than that of non-metastasis (P 0.05). The mean tumor-free survival time was (23 + 1.963) months and (32 + 1.643) months, respectively. The tumor-free survival time of patients with lymph node metastasis was shorter than that of patients without lymph node metastasis (P 0.05). The recurrence rates of pelvic lymph node dissection group and pelvic + para-aortic lymph node dissection group were 54.05% (20/37) and 31.34% (21/67), respectively. The median tumor-free survival was 20 months in pelvic lymph node dissection group, 39 months in pelvic + para-aortic lymph node dissection group, and longer in pelvic + para-aortic lymph node dissection group than in pelvic lymph node dissection group (P 0.05). Palpation dissection can determine the stage of epithelial ovarian cancer, reduce the recurrence rate, prolong the tumor-free survival rate; 2. epithelial ovarian cancer needs pelvic + abdominal para-aortic lymph node dissection, because the left renal vein lymph node metastasis rate is high, lymph node dissection should reach the level of the left renal vein. 3. clinical stage late, serous cancer, low differentiation is Epithelial ovarian cancer is a high risk factor for lymph node metastasis. Pelvic + para-aortic lymphadenectomy is especially necessary in this group of patients.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R737.31
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 管先华,谢瑞梦,赵晓虹,田昌英;上皮性卵巢癌远处转移15例分析[J];四川肿瘤防治;2001年01期
2 王常玉,顾美皎,王世宣,马丁;三种化疗方案治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌的疗效比较[J];实用妇产科杂志;2002年04期
3 李双弟,万小平,杨兆瑞,胡宏慧,席晓薇,徐先明;血管内皮生长因子及其受体与上皮性卵巢癌发展[J];肿瘤;2003年03期
4 袁令芹;上皮性卵巢癌226例临床病理分析[J];肿瘤防治杂志;2003年08期
5 周晓亮 ,陈轶群;血小板计数与晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者二探结果及疾病进展的关系[J];国外医学.妇产科学分册;2004年06期
6 赵玲军;术中即时化疗在上皮性卵巢癌治疗中的应用[J];中国基层医药;2005年10期
7 Hopkins L.;Fung Kee Fung M.;王颖;;上皮性卵巢癌进展期辅助和补救化疗过程中患者生活质量评估[J];世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册);2005年11期
8 王鑫;吕杰强;朱雪琼;;胰岛素样生长因子系统在上皮性卵巢癌中的研究进展[J];国外医学.妇产科学分册;2006年04期
9 李海玲;任慕兰;钱惠勤;;上皮性卵巢癌血管内皮生长因子表达及微血管密度[J];江苏医药;2007年01期
10 贺国丽;;铂类敏感的复发上皮性卵巢癌二次肿瘤细胞减灭术的指南和选择标准[J];国外医学(妇产科学分册);2007年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 程蓓;郭轶男;吕卫国;万小云;陈亚侠;谢幸;;上皮性卵巢癌患者保留生育功能13例分析[A];第四届长三角妇产科学术论坛暨浙江省2009年妇产科学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
2 许红;;Ⅲ期上皮性卵巢癌的治疗与预后分析[A];中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会第六次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2001年
3 周慧梅;黄惠芳;潘凌亚;沈铿;吴鸣;杨佳欣;;血清CA125值的变化对判断上皮性卵巢癌预后的临床价值[A];中华医学会第九次全国妇科肿瘤学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
4 叶海燕;陈建国;徐嘉文;陈志红;;has-miRNA let-7a在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达及其临床意义[A];中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议妇科肿瘤会场(妇科肿瘤学组、妇科病理学组)论文汇编[C];2012年
5 谢敏;李艺;崔恒;;复发性上皮性卵巢癌的手术治疗[A];中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议妇科肿瘤会场(妇科肿瘤学组、妇科病理学组)论文汇编[C];2012年
6 许红;王中弥;左馨;;Ⅲ期上皮性卵巢癌58例临床分析[A];中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会第七次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
7 郄明蓉;杨小芸;张崇淑;;28例Ⅳ期及复发上皮性卵巢癌的治疗选择与预后分析[A];中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会第七次全国学术会议论文汇编[C];2003年
8 郄明蓉;郑艾;杨小芸;张崇淑;;28例Ⅳ期及复发上皮性卵巢癌的治疗选择与预后分析[A];第八次全国妇产科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
9 郄明蓉;张崇淑;郑艾;杨小芸;;28例Ⅳ期及复发上皮性卵巢癌的治疗选择与预后分析[A];第八次全国妇产科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
10 彭素蓉;王金华;陈小祥;;上皮性卵巢癌系统性腹膜后淋巴结切除术及临床意义——附102例报告[A];江苏省抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会第四次肿瘤学术研讨会暨无锡市妇产科年会论文汇编[C];2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 王宇;FoxM1剪接异构体在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达及相关功能研究[D];第四军医大学;2013年
2 金佟;CA125/T ELISA法用于CA125升高的良恶性鉴别及其临床应用[D];复旦大学;2014年
3 严春晓;水通道蛋白亚型AQP5及AQP9在上皮性卵巢癌细胞增殖与迁移中的功能研究[D];浙江大学;2015年
4 黄宇婷;基于定量多色荧光原位杂交技术的卵巢癌多基因拷贝数异常的研究[D];天津医科大学;2015年
5 冷若冰;Rac1在上皮性卵巢癌上皮间质转化中的作用及机制的初步研究[D];重庆医科大学;2015年
6 梁军;肿瘤干细胞样细胞在上皮性卵巢癌血管生成拟态中作用的研究[D];河北医科大学;2016年
7 胡建国;MARCH7促进上皮性卵巢癌恶性进展及机制的研究[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
8 陆萌;FKBP14对上皮性卵巢癌细胞增殖和迁移能力的影响[D];南京医科大学;2016年
9 牛海英;PPA1通过促进上皮—间质转化影响上皮性卵巢癌的转移[D];天津医科大学;2016年
10 沈文静;上皮性卵巢癌多肿瘤抑制基因异常甲基化的研究[D];中国医科大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨一鸣;血小板增多症在上皮性卵巢癌中的诊断意义及预后评估[D];大连医科大学;2013年
2 邱章灿;Ⅲc期上皮性卵巢癌预后危险因素与无进展生存期关系探讨[D];广西医科大学;2015年
3 秦凯云;上皮性卵巢癌患者血浆化疗耐药相关蛋白质分析及临床意义[D];河北医科大学;2015年
4 董杰;上皮性卵巢癌中TGF-β1的表达与耐药相关基因的关系[D];河北医科大学;2015年
5 齐新颖;LRP、GST-π表达与上皮性卵巢癌铂类化疗耐药及预后的关系[D];河北医科大学;2015年
6 田美玲;ERCC1基因多态性及蛋白表达与上皮性卵巢癌铂类化疗敏感性及预后关系的研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
7 贾亚静;子宫内膜癌、上皮性卵巢癌、早期宫颈癌预后因素分析[D];河北医科大学;2015年
8 杨晗;77例上皮性卵巢癌预后相关因素分析[D];河北医科大学;2015年
9 张根豪;阿司匹林对人上皮性卵巢癌SKOV3细胞SOX7表达和Wnt/β-catenin信号通路的影响[D];郑州大学;2015年
10 肖喜云;HER2蛋白在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达及曲妥珠单抗对卵巢癌SKOV3细胞的影响[D];河北医科大学;2015年
,本文编号:2185099
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2185099.html