基于高通量数据的间变脑胶质瘤分子分型与生物标记物挖掘
[Abstract]:Part I: Molecular typing of anaplastic gliomas based on gene expression profiles: Previous genome-wide expression profiles have shown good stability and effectiveness in the study of molecular typing of full-grade gliomas (WHO II-IV) or primary glioblastomas (WHO IV), and can be used to reveal different cell origins of gliomas. Methods: To obtain an objective and feasible molecular typing scheme for anaplastic gliomas, we downloaded three sets of mutually independent metaplastic gliomas gene tables from a public database. By combining univariate Cox regression, linear combination of risk score and ROC curve, we constructed gene tags with the best prognostic discrimination effect. To further explain the molecular mechanism of prognostic differences among different subtypes, we continued to apply gene ontology analysis (GO), genome. Variation analysis (GSVA) and genome enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to reveal the biological functions associated with the classification. Results: A total of 444 cases of anaplastic glioma gene expression profiles were collected from different platforms (34 cases in CGGA database, 80 cases in GSE16011 database, 67 cases in REMBRANDT database and 263 cases in TCGA database). Finally, we obtained a three-gene-based molecular typing scheme for anaplastic gliomas. The scheme divides anaplastic gliomas into high-risk group and low-risk group, and the prognosis of the two groups is significantly different. The high-risk group had more aggressive tumors and more complex genetic background. Conclusion: The three-gene typing scheme can well distinguish the clinical prognosis of patients. BACKGROUND OF BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN GLIOMA: The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies gliomas into different pathological grades according to their morphological characteristics. However, even in the same grade of tumors, their malignancy still varies considerably. This suggests that we should look for more objective and effective indicators to accurately judge the malignancy and biology of tumors. Phosphorylated histone H3 (p HH3) is a widely reported biomarker in various somatic tumors and has a characteristic expression in the stage of tumor cell division. Methods: To study the prognostic value and biological function of P HH3 in gliomas, we first studied the expression of P HH3 in 61 cases of anaplastic gliomas by immunohistochemistry. Then we studied P HH3 and its related genes in glia by using 325 Chinese glioma m RNA sequencing data, 169 US TCGA glioblastoma m RNA sequencing data, 305 Chinese glioma m RNA microarray data and 603 US TCGA glioblastoma m RNA microarray data. The prognostic value and biological significance of tumors were further confirmed by multivariate Cox regression and genome enrichment analysis (GSEA). Results: The expression of P HH3 protein, m RNA and P HH3-related genes could predict the prognosis of patients in multiple datasets. In addition, in the GSEA results, we found that P HH3 is not only associated with cell cycle, but also with epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of tumors. Conclusion: PHH3 and its related genes can be divided into two different subtypes of gliomas. The two subtypes of tumors have distinct clinical prognosis and biological characteristics. The biological significance of tumor cell purity in glioma: glioma tissue contains not only tumor cells, but also stromal cells, immune cells and other non-tumor cells. These non-tumor cells dilute the purity of tumor cells and play an important role in the microenvironment of tumor survival. Methods: We collected the purity of glioma cells from 5 clinical cohorts and 2 249 samples. According to the different research methods in the five cohorts, the data from RNA sequencing sources (CGGA, TCGA RNA sequencing data) were used as discovery group and the data from m RNA microarray sources (CGGA, TCGA, REMB). RANDT, GSE16011 m RNA chip data) were used as the validation group. In addition, CGGA-derived tumor samples were validated by HE and immunohistochemical methods. Results: We found that tumor cell purity was significantly correlated with major clinical and molecular pathological events of gliomas. After incorporating the tumor purity index, the effectiveness of many known prognostic factors has been significantly reduced, further validating the important biological significance of tumor purity. In addition, through joint analysis of sample-related genomic data, we found the purity phase of tumor cells. Associated with prognostic analysis, we found that the expression profiles of macrophages, microglia and neutrophils were correlated with the prognosis. Conclusion: The purity of tumor cells and the proportion of non-tumor cells in tumor microenvironment are significantly correlated with clinical and genomic characteristics, which is of great significance for accurate classification and clinical diagnosis of glioma.
【学位授予单位】:首都医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R739.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙伟建;;脑胶质瘤的外科治疗研究进展[J];医学研究通讯;2000年01期
2 张庆林;脑胶质瘤的治疗 前言[J];山东医药;2001年07期
3 韩立虎,叶应湖,王国安;血管内皮生长因子、微血管密度在脑胶质瘤中的表达[J];咸宁医学院学报;2001年04期
4 李煜;脑胶质瘤误诊10例分析[J];中国社区医师;2002年14期
5 王瑞民,田嘉禾,刘雁翎,陈英茂;目测分级法鉴别脑胶质瘤复发或残存的价值[J];中华核医学杂志;2003年02期
6 赵希鹏;脑胶质瘤病一例报告[J];青海医药杂志;2003年09期
7 陈灿中;5例脑胶质瘤病的诊断和治疗[J];云南医药;2004年04期
8 张华楸,舒凯,叶飞,郭东升,牛洪泉,雷霆,李龄;脑胶质瘤病的诊断和治疗[J];中华神经医学杂志;2005年06期
9 ;《脑胶质瘤》出版[J];中华神经外科杂志;2007年09期
10 迟鸿冰;边海泉;;脑胶质瘤超声表现1例[J];中国超声医学杂志;2008年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 付学海;石梅;肖锋;;分次伽马刀治疗脑胶质瘤的疗效分析[A];中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集[C];2009年
2 傅相平;李安民;;脑胶质瘤瘤区化疗的临床研究[A];中华医学会神经外科学分会第九次学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
3 殷增进;;脑胶质瘤伽马刀治疗临床分析[A];中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第六届全国代表大会论文汇编[C];2011年
4 汪志明;陈淑珍;王林;;中西医结合治疗脑胶质瘤24例报道[A];第八届全国中西医结合肿瘤学术会议论文集[C];2000年
5 沈宏;郑学胜;祝向东;傅伟明;胡未伟;黄欣;朱永坚;李立;龚江标;;脑胶质瘤病理特征与预后[A];2006年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
6 卢刚;吴旭;;脑胶质瘤放、化疗前后血脑屏障的组织学研究[A];2006年浙江省神经外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
7 祝鸣兰;方卫琴;;~(125)Ⅰ粒子治疗脑胶质瘤15例的护理[A];全国外科、神经内外科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2006年
8 熊晓鹏;胡超苏;;脑胶质瘤的放射治疗临床研究进展[A];第四届中国肿瘤学术大会暨第五届海峡两岸肿瘤学术会议论文集[C];2006年
9 蒋恒;杨伟志;高黎;雷明芳;石慧珍;徐国镇;;脑胶质瘤分次照射生物效应的实验研究[A];2007第六届全国放射肿瘤学学术年会论文集[C];2007年
10 姚瑜;叶红星;汤旭群;花玮;史之峰;高晓宁;汪洋;汪寅;吴劲松;秦智勇;毛颖;周良辅;;脑胶质瘤个体化综合治疗体系的建立和发展[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 邹争春 朱广平 记者 陈磊;不用开刀就能“精确定位”脑胶质瘤[N];科技日报;2013年
2 邹争春 朱广平;脑胶质瘤诊断有望从“有创”到“无创”[N];中国医药报;2013年
3 张献怀;我国脑胶质瘤研究获新进展[N];大众科技报;2007年
4 本报通讯员 张献怀;对脑胶质瘤进行局部强力“打击”[N];大众科技报;2007年
5 张献怀;脑胶质瘤别急着手术[N];健康时报;2007年
6 张献怀;科学家提出对脑胶质瘤应进行局部强力打击[N];科技日报;2007年
7 金源;中关村生命科学园构建国家生物医药基地[N];中国医药报;2006年
8 张献怀;对脑胶质瘤应进行局部强力打击[N];中国医药报;2007年
9 健康时报特约记者 朱立明;切脑胶质瘤用超声引导[N];健康时报;2007年
10 通讯员 张献怀;脑胶质瘤临床研究与治疗获新进展[N];大众科技报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 张传宝;基于高通量数据的间变脑胶质瘤分子分型与生物标记物挖掘[D];首都医科大学;2017年
2 赵芬;功能影像预测复发脑胶质瘤及非小细胞肺癌骨转移预后的临床研究[D];山东大学;2015年
3 王耀伍;FOXC2在脑胶质瘤中表达并与其他肿瘤标记物相关性研究及其临床病理意义[D];河北医科大学;2015年
4 吴秀伟;Rab27a对人脑胶质瘤细胞生物活性的影响及其在老年脑胶质瘤中的临床应用[D];安徽医科大学;2014年
5 魏晓丽;稳定性多肽介导跨屏障膜的脑胶质瘤双重靶向递药系统研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
6 韩海玲;脑胶质瘤靶向纳米药物及其与放疗联用的实验研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
7 杨沛;分子病理指导下的脑胶质瘤分子分型及综合治疗研究[D];首都医科大学;2016年
8 秦国强;EFEMP1 rs3791679单核苷酸多态性与脑胶质瘤易感性的关联性研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年
9 张灿;靶向干扰Diaph1表达对脑胶质瘤细胞增殖、凋亡、迁移的影响及分子机制的研究[D];上海大学;2016年
10 邵灵敏;脑胶质瘤中调控LRIG1表达的微小RNA筛选及机制研究[D];武汉大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙文博;酪氨酸激酶2(DDR2)和血管内皮细胞生长因子(VEGF)在脑胶质瘤中的表达及相关性研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
2 姚冉;孕烷X受体在脑胶质瘤中的临床意义[D];新乡医学院;2015年
3 赵江华;脑胶质瘤预后的影响因素分析[D];山西医科大学;2015年
4 朱潇鹏;不同级别脑胶质瘤中差异microRNA的表达谱研究[D];第三军医大学;2015年
5 李政;胶质瘤MGMT的表达及意义[D];四川医科大学;2015年
6 张忠民;IL-6与NF-κB在人脑胶质瘤中的表达及相关性研究[D];佳木斯大学;2015年
7 胡全银;多肽介导的脑胶质瘤靶向递药策略研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
8 张娜娜;miR-103/195/15b调控SALL4抑制脑胶质瘤细胞增殖及侵袭作用的研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
9 孙恒翠;~1H-MRS在亚急性脑梗死与低级别脑胶质瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值[D];山东大学;2015年
10 潘俊辰;异常表达长链非编码RNA在脑胶质瘤中的功能研究[D];南京医科大学;2015年
,本文编号:2205180
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2205180.html