NOP16低表达增强前列腺癌化疗敏感性的初步研究
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the effect of NOP16 expression on the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to Docetaxel chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo, and to explore its molecular mechanism.Methods: The expression of NOP16 in PCa and BPH tissues was detected by RT-q PCR, and the expression of NOP16 in normal prostate cell line RWPE-1 and PCa cell line L was detected by RT-q PCR and Western Blot. The expression of NOP16 short hairpin RNA (sh RNA) in PC3 cells was obtained by drug screening and stable transfection, and the expression of NOP16 in PC3 cells was verified by RT-q PCR and Western Blot. Cell count assay and CCK-8 assay were used to detect the proliferation of NOP16-KDPC3 cells, cell migration assay (Transwell) was used to detect the migration ability of NOP16-KDPC3 cells, and phosphatidylserine valgus assay (Annexin V) was used to detect the apoptosis of NOP16-KDPC3 cells. Cell viability was measured by CCK-8 assay hours later; PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells were treated with sublethal dose of Docetaxel, and the cell viability was detected by CCK-8 assay. Monoclonal formation experiments were performed with PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells, and cell proliferation was detected by Docetaxel treatment; PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells were cultured with Docetax. Cell proliferation was detected by cell cycle assay after treatment with Docetaxel; PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells were cultured with Docetaxel; PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells were cultured with Docetaxel and Transwell assay was performed after treatment with Docetaxel. The expression of NOP16 in PC3, PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cell lines LNCa P and PC3-NOP16-KD was higher than that in normal prostate cell lines RWPE-1 and NOP16 was higher than that in Pca and PC3-NOP16-KD cell lines RWPE-1. No significant changes were observed in the two different prostate cancer cell lines mentioned above; sh RNA was transfected into PC3 cells using lentiviruses as vectors by biotechnology and NOP16 expression was down-regulated. PC3-NOP16-KD stably expressed cells could be established by PC3 cells; and sh RNA-specific lentiviral vectors could be down-regulated. The level of endogenous NOP16 could induce the decrease of cell proliferation in vitro; the decrease of NOP16 expression in PC3 cells could inhibit cell migration; the apoptosis of PC3-NOP16-KD cells could be observed in comparison with normal PC3 cells; the protein synthesis level of PC3-NOP16-KD cells was lower than that of normal PC3 cells. The activity of PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells decreased after treatment with different concentrations of Docetaxel, and the half lethal dose of IC50 was found to be between 30 nmol/L (24 h) and 20 nmol/L (48 h). PC3-Vector and PC3-NOP16-KD cells were exposed to sublethal concentration of Docetaxel, respectively. Cells were more sensitive to the concentration of Docetaxel, suggesting that inhibiting NOP16 could enhance the inhibitory effect of Docetaxel on prostate cancer cells; the number of cell clones in NOP16-KD group was significantly less than that in control group, and the number of monoclonal cells in NOP16-KD group was significantly lower than that in control group, suggesting that NOP16 might participate in cell proliferation by inhibiting the concentration of Docetaxel. Compared with the control group, the apoptosis rate of NOP16-KD group was significantly higher, and the apoptosis rate of NOP16-KD group was also significantly higher, suggesting that inhibiting the expression of NOP16 might increase the sensitivity of PC3 cells to Docetaxel chemotherapy. In addition, the proliferation of NOP16-KD cells after Docetaxel treatment was also significantly lower than that of the control group. NOP16 may be involved in the ability of cell proliferation to resist the inhibition of Docetaxel on cells. Cell migration test showed that NOP16-KD cells migration ability was lower than that of the control group, and NOP16-KD cells were fine after Docetaxel treatment. Cell migration ability was also significantly lower than that of the control group, suggesting that NOP16 might be able to resist the inhibition of Docetaxel by participating in cell migration ability; the content of Caspase 3 in PC3-NOP16-KD group was higher than that of the control group; moreover, the content of Caspase 3 in Docetaxel-treated group was significantly higher than that in the control group, suggesting that the expression of NOP16 was different. The tumor-forming volume of NOP16-KD cells in nude mice was smaller than that of the control group. The tumor volume of NOP16-KD group was further reduced after Docetaxel chemotherapy. In vivo experiments showed that NOP16 could significantly increase the sensitivity of Docetaxel chemotherapy. Conclusion: The abnormal expression of NOP16 could change prostate cancer cells. Biological behavior in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that NOP16-KD can increase the sensitivity of Docetaxel to chemotherapy. NOP16 may be a potential target for gene therapy of prostate cancer.
【学位授予单位】:天津医科大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R737.25
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 乔建梁;孟兴凯;张俊晶;齐力;;评估肿瘤化疗敏感性方法的研究进展[J];现代肿瘤医学;2008年05期
2 梁俊青;李碧丽;苏秀兰;;荧光定量RT-PCR技术在评估肿瘤化疗敏感性中的应用进展[J];内蒙古医学院学报;2010年03期
3 冯玉钰;宁连胜;冯玉梅;;二氢嘧啶脱氢酶与肿瘤化疗敏感性及预后的关系[J];国际检验医学杂志;2006年12期
4 黄东海;葛林虎;范梦颖;邱源;邵文龙;徐鑫;;人端粒酶逆转录酶预测肺癌化疗敏感性的体外研究[J];中国医药导刊;2012年09期
5 姚向阳,何三虎,王世英;免疫抑制鼠肾包膜下法检测口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤联合化疗敏感性的实验研究[J];西安医科大学学报(中文版);1998年01期
6 喻卫红;王静;王晓彬;李英辉;张烨;王玉名;田雪;;恶性肿瘤患者化疗敏感性筛选的临床意义[J];临床肿瘤学杂志;2013年09期
7 郭英辉;影响胃癌化疗敏感性的因素[J];日本医学介绍;1990年06期
8 傅文凡;赵健;;SELDI-TOF-MS技术在预测肿瘤化疗敏感性中的应用[J];医学综述;2010年03期
9 邢海杰;曾宗渊;郭朱明;杨安奎;李浩;;差异表达基因谱预测下咽鳞癌化疗敏感性的临床研究[J];苏州大学学报(医学版);2009年04期
10 唐伟,徐弘,真船健一;基因与化疗敏感性研究[J];国外医学(肿瘤学分册);1999年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 高长明;;基因多态性与癌症化疗敏感性关系的研究进展[A];肿瘤药物及肿瘤传统医学治疗研究[C];2005年
2 刘宝辉;陈谦学;冀保卫;吴立权;田道锋;;骨形成发生蛋白4与脑胶质瘤化疗敏感性之间的关系[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
3 姜圣亮;谭江平;郝杰民;叶世会;;MTT法检测肿瘤细胞化疗敏感性方法学探讨[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年
4 宋少莉;刘建军;王兆海;万良荣;吴书其;黄钢;;~(18)F-FDG PET/CT作为化疗敏感性在体监测手段的实验研究?[A];第四届全国中青年核医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
5 刘鹏;苏丹;王磊;张毅敏;邓清华;倪玲玲;朱远;胡巧英;马胜林;;XRCC3单核苷酸多态性与肺癌放化疗敏感性的相关性研究[A];2007年浙江省放射肿瘤治疗学学术年会暨肿瘤放射治疗规范和新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2007年
6 王峰;樊青霞;;沉默Stathmin的表达对食管鳞癌紫杉醇化疗敏感性的影响[A];中国肿瘤内科进展 中国肿瘤医师教育(2014)[C];2014年
7 陈燕;向阳;马妍;林晨;;腺病毒携带PUMA基因增加耐药绒癌化疗敏感性的研究[A];中华医学会第一届全球华人妇产科学术大会暨第三次全国妇产科中青年医师学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
8 王琦;高建华;何志娟;郑建华;;S100p基因致卵巢癌化疗敏感性增高的体外验证[A];东北三省第四届妇产科学术会议论文汇编[C];2008年
9 刘佳;符爽;杨敏;郭艳;孙开来;富伟能;;BAX对Hep2细胞系的凋亡及化疗敏感性的影响[A];东北三省及内蒙古地区遗传学研究进展学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2009年
10 刘佳;郭艳;孙开来;富伟能;;BAX对Hep2细胞系的凋亡及化疗敏感性的影响[A];第八次全国医学遗传学学术会议(中华医学会2009年医学遗传学年会)论文摘要汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 北京中医药大学东直门医院血液肿瘤科副主任 侯丽;难治性白血病中药可提高化疗敏感性[N];健康报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 李凯;NOP16低表达增强前列腺癌化疗敏感性的初步研究[D];天津医科大学;2017年
2 周洪浩;Smad3通过抑制AKT磷酸化增加肝癌细胞对顺铂的化疗敏感性[D];华中科技大学;2016年
3 周阳;DNA甲基化与食管鳞状细胞癌患者化疗敏感性的相关性研究[D];北京协和医学院;2017年
4 阿卜杜(ABDULALAM ABDULRAB M.F);神经降压素在去势抵抗性前列腺癌神经内分泌分型中的应用[D];天津医科大学;2017年
5 张慧明;ALKBH与前列腺癌关系的初步研究[D];郑州大学;2017年
6 王亮;HSPC111基因表达与前列腺癌放射敏感性关系的研究[D];天津医科大学;2017年
7 姜行康;microRNA-503通过ZNF217抑制前列腺癌进展的机制研究[D];天津医科大学;2017年
8 吕丽媛;丹参提取物对人前列腺癌干细胞生物学行为的干预作用及机制研究[D];中国中医科学院;2017年
9 田焕书;miR-218调控前列腺癌肿瘤干细胞干性及其分子机制研究[D];暨南大学;2017年
10 武丹;以FKBP51为靶点的小分子抑制前列腺癌AR信号通路[D];兰州大学;2017年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 岳园园;靶向前列腺癌的两种探针的研究[D];郑州大学;2017年
2 邓成辉;GSTP1 Ile105Val(A/G)多态性与进展期胃癌铂类药物化疗敏感性的Meta分析[D];兰州大学;2015年
3 宋晓平;慢病毒介导的HER2-shRNA对卵巢癌SKOV3细胞化疗敏感性的体内外研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
4 梁强;EZH2参与调控胶质母细胞瘤对替莫唑胺化疗敏感性的机理研究[D];第二军医大学;2015年
5 李聪;直肠癌新辅助放化疗敏感性相关基因的筛查、验证及应用[D];复旦大学;2014年
6 刘维;GSTP1、RRM1基因多态性与晚期NSCLC患者GP方案化疗敏感性关系的研究[D];南华大学;2015年
7 张大凯;人乳头瘤病毒感染对食管鳞癌放化疗敏感性及预后的影响及其机制的研究[D];济南大学;2015年
8 郭文莉;曲古霉素A对结直肠癌Lovo细胞株5-氟尿嘧啶化疗敏感性的影响及可能机制的研究[D];山西医科大学;2016年
9 王世超;干扰EGFR对胃癌AGS细胞肿瘤生物学行为及化疗敏感性的影响[D];郑州大学;2016年
10 赵倩;局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者血清miR-23a表达与放化疗敏感性相关研究[D];济南大学;2016年
,本文编号:2215217
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2215217.html