IPOM法预置疝补片对Miles术后造口旁疝的预防作用
[Abstract]:Objective: colorectal cancer patients are increasing year by year, in which low rectal cancer accounts for a high proportion. The current standard procedure for patients with low rectal and anal cancer is still Miles (abdominal perineum combined with rectal cancer radical resection) and is almost the only treatment that can be cured. The most important feature of this procedure is the establishment of artificial anus in the abdominal wall of the patient. Although the patient's life span is longer, the appearance of the fistula also brings a series of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, necrosis, infection, obstruction, stenosis and paracentesis hernia. Paracostomy hernia is a common complication after colostomy, and seriously reduces the postoperative quality of life. Because of the high incidence (up to 50%) of parastatal hernia and the complexity of surgical repair, it is very important to prevent the formation of paracentotomy hernia. There are many factors that affect the occurrence of paracentesis hernia, such as age, sex, obesity, malnutrition, chronic cough and so on. Although surgeons do a lot of work to prevent paracentesis hernia, its incidence remains high. Recent foreign studies have reported that strengthening the strength of abdominal wall around colostomy by implanting herniation patch can effectively prevent the occurrence of para-stomal hernia. In this study, Miles was performed in patients with low rectal cancer and Bard CK herniation patch was prepositioned at sigmoidostomy with IPOM method (peritoneal internal fixation) to explore the effect of preimplantation hernia patch on prevention of paracostomal hernia. Methods: from June 2014 to June 2015, 50 patients with low rectal cancer underwent Miles operation and underwent rectus sigmoidostomy from June 2014 to June 2015 were randomly divided into two groups, 25 patients in each group. IPOM method was used in the experimental group to preposition Bard CK professional herniation patch beside the abdominal wall orifice, while the control group finished the orifice making directly in the abdominal wall. There were 14 males and 11 females, aged 45-69 years, with an average age of 56.2 years, while in the control group, there were 13 males and 12 females, aged between 46 and 72 years, with an average age of 57.4 years. The site was selected and marked by the surgeon and the surgeon before operation. The postoperative opening was recorded and maintained by the orthopedic therapist. After operation, the abdominal band was fixed for 3 months, during which laughter and high-intensity manual labor were avoided. Postoperative follow-up, abdominal CT scan to confirm the occurrence of parastatal hernia. Results 50 patients were followed up for 18-30 months with an average of 26.8 months. There were 2 patients in the test group with abdominal wall foreign body sensation and local prickly pain. 1. 1 patients had peristomal dermatitis and recovered after symptomatic treatment. The other patients had no complications such as bleeding, infection, dermatitis and necrosis. In the control group, there were 2 cases of peristomal inflammation after operation, and recovered after symptomatic treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05). All the patients underwent physical examination, asked about the condition after discharge, and CT scan of the outpatient abdomen. Six patients in the control group were confirmed to have parastotomy hernia by CT scan, but no P0.05 was found in the trial group. Conclusion: IPOM preplacement of Bard CK hernia patch during Miles in patients with low rectal cancer can prevent the occurrence of perioperative hernia and does not increase the incidence of total complications. The technique of preimplantation hernia patch has great application prospect. It is necessary to carry out multi-center, large sample prospective randomized controlled studies in China, accumulate research data, and strive to promote the technology as soon as possible, so that patients can obtain better prognosis and quality of life.
【学位授予单位】:安徽医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R735.37
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王新生,查润生,龙克艰,胡霜久;全直肠系膜切除术在Miles术中应用[J];河北医学;2002年10期
2 朱红;贾丽;丁艳;;低位直肠癌Miles术会阴部结肠套叠式人工肛门的护理体会[J];新疆医学;2008年05期
3 崔叶钧;直肠癌Miles术会阴切口一期缝合的评价[J];河南肿瘤学杂志;2001年03期
4 王闽全;李雪玉;于冰;马特;孙国辉;哈里木;;低位直肠癌Miles术后做会阴部结肠套叠式人工肛门20例体会[J];新疆医学;1996年02期
5 郑秀兰,于丽娟,李凤华,张艳华;直肠癌Miles术后局部复发的彩色多普勒血流显像研究[J];中华普通外科杂志;2000年11期
6 孙小飞;石磊;高志慧;;直肠癌Miles术后会阴切口一期缝合引流方法的选择[J];中国普通外科杂志;2012年10期
7 耿娇霞;老年人Miles术后切口感染的原因分析及防治对策[J];齐齐哈尔医学院学报;2000年03期
8 何炜杰,胡浩,汪良,钱海鑫;直肠癌Miles术保留盆腔自主神经的评价[J];苏州医学院学报;2001年06期
9 戴鹏;林云;;腹膜外人工肛门在Miles术中的应用[J];实用临床医学;2011年10期
10 渠时学;谢光伟;丁硕;李青;马祖泰;;腹膜外乙状结肠造口术在腹腔镜Miles术中的应用[J];腹腔镜外科杂志;2008年01期
相关会议论文 前7条
1 郑秀兰;于丽娟;李凤华;张艳华;;直肠癌Miles术后局部复发的彩色多普勒血流显像的研究[A];2000全国肿瘤学术大会论文集[C];2000年
2 邱英;张玉姬;;直肠癌Miles术后膀胱功能的恢复[A];河南省肿瘤全科护理学术交流会议资料汇编[C];2005年
3 杨瑾;莫开维;陈荣波;;肛肠科Miles术肠造瘘口护理体会[A];贵州省中西医结合学会肛肠学会第四届学术交流会暨新技术学习班论文汇编[C];2010年
4 黄大年;刘德瀛;;直肠癌Miles术后人造肛门的临床观察[A];大肠肛门病论文汇编[C];2001年
5 梁葵;林春惠;;老年直肠癌Miles术后人工肛门并发症的护理[A];全国肿瘤护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2007年
6 张国军;张谊国;;低位直肠癌Miles术后盆腔感染窦道形成3例报告[A];中西医结合肛肠病研究新进展[C];2000年
7 陈会林;尹和宅;;直肠癌Miles术后并发内疝性肠梗阻的防治(附1例报告)[A];2011年浙江省肛肠外科学术大会暨结直肠肛门疾病诊治新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 向瑶;手辅助腹腔镜技术在Miles术中盆底腹膜关闭的应用[D];重庆医科大学;2015年
2 罗世坤;盆底腹膜重建在腹腔镜辅助Miles术中的临床应用价值[D];吉林大学;2017年
3 刘国才;对比分析Miles术与保肛术治疗低位直肠癌的临床效果[D];大连医科大学;2015年
4 李君;直肠癌Miles术后会阴部切口愈合不良的多因素分析[D];广西医科大学;2007年
5 王维强;Miles术后造口旁疝22例临床分析[D];大连医科大学;2013年
6 刘庆良;直肠癌Miles术后局部复发因素分析[D];吉林大学;2012年
,本文编号:2253878
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2253878.html