当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 肿瘤论文 >

DNA修复率与非霍奇金淋巴瘤含烷化剂联合化疗疗效的相关性研究

发布时间:2018-10-05 21:58
【摘要】:背景与目的:淋巴瘤是原发于淋巴结或者淋巴结外组织或器官的恶性肿瘤,在我国排在恶性肿瘤死亡原因的第11位。淋巴瘤按照病理组织学的不同分为霍奇金淋巴瘤(Hodgkin's lymphoma,HL)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,NHL)。在我国,NHL发病率远高于HL。化学治疗是NHL的主要治疗手段,含烷化剂药物的联合化疗方案在NHL的治疗中得到广泛应用并取得可靠疗效。由于化疗是全身的系统性治疗,不仅杀死肿瘤细胞,同时也损伤了许多正常的非肿瘤细胞,从而产生严重的副作用,造成患者生活质量的下降。因而对药物的敏感性及疗效的预测成为肿瘤个体化治疗的重要环节。烷化剂对DNA分子造成损伤时,DNA修复机制同时启动,可以保护细胞免受化疗药物引起的基因毒性。DNA损伤修复过程极其复杂,相关基因、蛋白和酶只反应其中某一个或几个环节,而DNA修复率(DNA repair rate,DRR)能够全面反映个体的DNA修复能力,具有成为含烷化剂治疗疗效预测指标的研究基础和可行性。本研究采用单细胞凝胶电泳法(Single cell gel electrophoresis,SCGE)检测NHL初治患者外周血淋巴细胞(PBLC)的DNA修复率(DRR),并分析其与含烷化剂联合化疗疗效的关系,为NHL患者含烷化剂联合化疗的敏感性及近期疗效的预测提供依据。方法:采用单细胞凝胶电泳法检测30例NHL患者(肿瘤组)PBLC的DRR,并选取20例非肿瘤患者作为对照(对照组)。肿瘤组接受含环磷酰胺联合方案化疗并于4周期后评价疗效,分析肿瘤组和对照组在环磷酰胺暴露前与暴露且修复后的DRR及肿瘤组DRR与临床病理特征及含烷化剂联合化疗疗效的相关性。结果:利用尾长(TL)(Z=4.464,P=0.000)和尾相(TM)(Z=3.828,P=0.000)检测肿瘤组PBLC的DRR均低于对照组。肿瘤组PBLC的DRR与年龄、性别、ECOG评分、临床分期、LDH值、ki-67增值指数和是否饮酒均无关(P0.05)。30例NHL患者中CR 4例、PR 14例、SD 10例、PD 2例,客观有效率(ORR)为60.0%,疾病控制率(DCR)为93.3%。以TL评价DRR提示DRR与化疗疗效呈负相关(r=-0.409,p=0.025),以TM评价DRR提示DRR与化疗疗效无关(r=-0.224,p=0.234)。结论:非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者较非肿瘤患者DNA修复能力降低,DRR与非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者含烷化剂联合化疗近期疗效呈负相关。
[Abstract]:Background & objective: lymphoma is the primary malignant tumor in lymph nodes or tissues or organs outside lymph nodes, which ranks 11th among the causes of death of malignant tumors in China. Lymphoma is divided into Hodgkin's lymphoma (Hodgkin's lymphoma,HL) and non Hodgkin's lymphoma (Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,NHL) according to histopathology. The incidence of NHL in China is much higher than that in HL.. Chemotherapy is the main treatment method of NHL. The combination chemotherapy regimen containing alkylating agent has been widely used in the treatment of NHL and has obtained reliable curative effect. Because chemotherapy is systemic therapy, it not only kills tumor cells, but also injures many normal non-tumor cells, resulting in serious side effects and the decline of patients' quality of life. Therefore, the prediction of drug sensitivity and efficacy has become an important part of individualized tumor therapy. The repair mechanism of DNA molecules caused by alkylating agents is activated simultaneously, which can protect cells from the genetic toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic drugs. The repair process of DNA damage is extremely complicated. The related genes, proteins and enzymes only respond to one or more of them. DNA repair rate (DNA repair rate,DRR) can fully reflect individual DNA repair ability, which is the basis and feasibility of predicting the efficacy of alkylating agent therapy. In this study, single cell gel electrophoresis (Single cell gel electrophoresis,SCGE) was used to detect the DNA repair rate (DRR),) of (PBLC) in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with NHL, and to analyze the relationship between the DNA repair rate and the effect of alkylating agent combined with chemotherapy. To provide the basis for the sensitivity of NHL patients with alkylating agent combined with chemotherapy and the prediction of short-term curative effect. Methods: single cell gel electrophoresis was used to detect the DRR, of PBLC in 30 patients with NHL (tumor group) and 20 non-tumor patients as control group (control group). The tumor group received chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide regimen and evaluated the efficacy after 4 cycles. The relationship between DRR before and after exposure and repair of cyclophosphamide and the clinicopathological characteristics of DRR in tumor group and control group as well as the efficacy of alkylating agent combined chemotherapy were analyzed. Results: the DRR of PBLC in the tumor group was lower than that in the control group by using the tail length (TL) (4.464) and the tail phase (TM) (3.828 P0. 000). The DRR of PBLC in tumor group was not related to age, sex and score of ECOG, the value of Ki-67 in clinical stage and whether or not to drink (P0.05). Of the 30 patients with NHL, there were 4 cases of CR with PR and 10 cases of PD with PD. The objective effective rate of (ORR) was 60. 0. The rate of disease control was 93. 3 and the objective effective rate of (ORR) was 60. 0 and the rate of disease control was 93. 3% (P < 0. 05). DRR was negatively correlated with chemotherapeutic efficacy by TL evaluation of DRR (r-0.409), DRR by TM was not correlated with chemotherapeutic effect (r-0.224p0.234). Conclusion: the reduction of DNA repair ability in patients with non-Hodgkin 's lymphoma is negatively correlated with the short-term efficacy of alkylating agents combined with chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin 's lymphoma.
【学位授予单位】:安徽医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R733.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘明澄,李崇惠;DNA修复功能与衰老[J];老年学杂志;1986年01期

2 王肖鹏,蒋左庶,胡以平,程浒君,杨连生;干扰素对丝裂霉素C诱发的姊妹染色单体互换和紫外线诱发的DNA修复合成影响的研究[J];第二军医大学学报;1985年06期

3 葛炜;程吟梅;尹亚萍;钟繁;;急性淋巴细胞白血病患者外周血原始淋巴细胞DNA修复功能的初步研究[J];科技通报;1991年06期

4 蒋祝昌;XRCC1与DNA修复[J];国外医学.生物医学工程分册;2003年05期

5 赵实诚;DNA修复与急性非淋巴细胞性白血病幼稚细胞的DNA修复测定[J];北京医学;1985年04期

6 夏莹;周东波;胡成平;;DNA修复与顺铂耐药[J];国际病理科学与临床杂志;2006年04期

7 龙喜带;唐月浩;曲德英;马韵;;黄曲霉毒素B_1毒性及其发挥与DNA修复(修复相关酶)[J];右江民族医学院学报;2006年02期

8 吴燕;王金兵;龚惠民;;乙肝病毒感染对DNA修复功能的影响[J];天津医药;1991年08期

9 林东昕;代谢多态和DNA修复多态与癌症易感性[J];癌症;1997年05期

10 李晋涛,刘昕,吴玉章;p53基因与DNA修复[J];国外医学(分子生物学分册);2001年03期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 隋建丽;刘秀林;胡迎春;金璀珍;周平坤;吴德昌;;辐射诱发人支气管上皮细胞恶性转化亚克隆的细胞遗传和DNA修复研究[A];中国毒理学会第三届全国学术会议论文(摘要)集[C];2001年

2 胡宇;Elizabeth T.Snow;;砷对人角化细胞DNA修复和GSH水平及相关酶活性的调节[A];面向21世纪的科技进步与社会经济发展(下册)[C];1999年

3 尹娇杨;Ulla Vogel;Lars Bolund;Bjorn A.Nexo;;丹麦高加索人染色体19q13.2-3区域DNA修复等基因SNPs:连锁不平衡及其与基底细胞癌易感性研究[A];第六次全国医学遗传学学术会议文摘汇编[C];2005年

相关博士学位论文 前5条

1 路玫;针灸对环磷酰胺小鼠骨髓细胞DNA修复相关机制的动态研究[D];湖北中医学院;2008年

2 楼建林;癌症患者遗传不稳定性的体内外研究及其与四个DNA修复相关蛋白的关系[D];浙江大学;2007年

3 丁佩剑;DNA修复通路基因多态位点与乳腺癌发病风险在中国北方汉族女性人群中的遗传关联研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年

4 高冠军;耐辐射球菌DNA修复开关基因pprI的研究[D];浙江大学;2005年

5 杨青山;DNA修复蛋白Ku80在人食管癌发生发展中的作用研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 王丹丹;DNA修复率与晚期消化道肿瘤含铂化疗方案疗效相关性的研究[D];安徽医科大学;2015年

2 范开杰;肺腺癌DNA修复通路与NFκB1基因的相关性研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年

3 庄妍;DNA修复率与非霍奇金淋巴瘤含烷化剂联合化疗疗效的相关性研究[D];安徽医科大学;2016年

4 郭子衣;艾灸促进HCC癌前病变大鼠肝细胞DNA修复作用研究[D];成都中医药大学;2006年

5 陈寒春;胶质瘤组织中DNA修复相关基因表达研究[D];苏州大学;2003年

6 卜秀华;子宫内膜癌发生过程中DNA修复蛋白表达的意义[D];大连医科大学;2007年

7 邵超;DNA修复相关基因在镉亚慢性暴露大鼠中的表达改变[D];广州医学院;2012年

8 张乔;DNA修复蛋白XPF影响肾癌细胞顺铂耐药的作用与机制研究[D];第三军医大学;2014年

9 骆海军;DNA修复相关基因甲基化与肺癌A549细胞顺铂化疗耐药的相关性[D];贵阳医学院;2014年

10 刘晓林;拟南芥DNA修复蛋白MSH5在减数分裂过程中的功能研究[D];中国农业科学院;2008年



本文编号:2255014

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2255014.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bea5e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com