EGFR单克隆抗体在头颈鳞癌中应用的meta分析及药物增敏策略研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor monoclonal antibody (EGFR-Mabs) in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by meta analysis. On this basis, the sensitizing effect and mechanism of dihydroartemisinin (DHA), hydrochloride metformin (metformin) and AG490 on Fadu cell line (Cetuximab) were studied. Methods: Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), PUBMED,EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched. Total response rate (over response rate,ORR), progressive survival (progression-free survival,PFS) and total survival (overall survival,OS) were analyzed. Adverse reactions were observed mainly in grade 3-4 severe adverse reactions. Results the evaluation was expressed by relative risk (Relative Risk,RR) or risk ratio (Hazard Rate,HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The effect of DHA,metformin and AG490 combined with Cetuximab in Fadu cell line was studied by MTT equivalent graph method. Western blot technique was used to detect the expression of p-STAT _ (3) T _ (STAT _ (3) -MAPK and Bcl-xl,Mcl-1,Cyclin D _ (1) protein in Fadu cells treated with different drugs. Flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptosis of Fadu cells treated with different drugs. Results: (1) in patients with recurrent / metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ORR:RR:1.61,95% CI:1.34-1.92,P0.001; PFS:HR:0.68,95%CI:0.61-0.76, P 0.001); OS:HR:0.84,95%CI:0.75-0.95, P0. 004). (2 was used to treat locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients (ORR 1.21, 0.97-1.49, PFS 0.87, 0.75-1.01respectively). OS 0.82n 0.71-0.95). (3) in Cetuximab patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, there was no significant difference in 2-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate between Cetuximab group and non-Cetuximab group (PFS:RR=1.02,). 95%CI 0.92-1.12; P = 0.76; OS:RR=1.06,95%CI 1.00-1.13, P = 0.06); In patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, the overall survival time, progression free survival time and overall response rate in Cetuximab group were significantly higher than those in Cetuximab group (OS:MD=2.41,95%CI 0.96-3.86 PnP 0.001). PFS:MD=2.06, 95%CI 1.34-2.77, P0.00001; ORR:OR=2.38,95% CI 1.60-3.54, P0.00001). The 1-year survival rate did not increase significantly (OR=1.39,95% CI 0.98-1.97). (5) in the Fadu cell line, the combination of DHA,metformin, AG490 and Cetuximab was studied by using MTT equivalent graph method, and antagonistic effects were produced, respectively, in the EGFR-Mabs treatment group, which was characterized by skin reaction as the representative of severe adverse reaction. (5) in the Fadu cell line, the combination of DHA,metformin and AG490 with Cetuximab was studied by MTT equivalent graph method. Addition and synergy; Western blot technique was used to detect the expression of p-STAT3T-STAT3pMAPK and Bcl-x1,Mcl-1,Cyclin D1 protein in Fadu cells. The combination of metformin and AG490 with Cetuximab significantly reduced p-STAT3 and its downstream factor Bcl-xl,Mcl-1,Cyclin D1. Expression of VEGF protein. Flow cytometry showed that metformin, AG490 and Cetuximab increased apoptosis in Fadu cells. Conclusion: EGFR-Mabs is effective in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but its clinical effect is not satisfactory due to the existence of treatment resistance. Severe grade 3-4 adverse reactions, represented by skin reactions, were more common in the EGFR-Mabs treatment group, and the difference was statistically significant. The combination of DHA and Cetuximab showed antagonistic effect. The mechanism needs further study. The combination of metformin and AG490 with Cetuximab can enhance the sensitivity under certain conditions, which may be related to their combined blocking of related signaling pathways.
【学位授予单位】:中国人民解放军医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R739.91
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘世喜,杨焕,唐志全,梁传余;白细胞介素-2基因联合放疗对小鼠头颈鳞癌治疗作用的研究[J];临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志;2003年02期
2 阮宏莹;林鹏;;脱氢环氧甲基醌霉素对头颈鳞癌细胞侵袭的抑制[J];天津医药;2007年08期
3 ;头颈鳞癌的多学科综合治疗:最新进展[J];中国口腔颌面外科杂志;2008年04期
4 Saba NF;Khuri FR;;基于靶向药物的头颈鳞癌优化系统治疗[J];中国口腔颌面外科杂志;2009年05期
5 常力方;分程放疗对头颈鳞癌作用的再评价[J];国外医学(临床放射学分册);1981年05期
6 ;高危险性头颈鳞癌的术后加速放疗:一项前瞻研究的远期结果[J];国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册);1999年03期
7 Tanvetyanon T;Padhya T;McCaffrey J;;术后同期放化疗在高危头颈鳞癌中的应用[J];中国口腔颌面外科杂志;2014年03期
8 杨焕,鲜均明,梁传余,刘世喜,彭文珍;阳离子脂质体介导白细胞介素2基因治疗头颈鳞癌的初步实验研究[J];中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志;2002年02期
9 卢恕来,高文信;真核细胞翻译起始因子4E与头颈鳞癌关系的研究进展[J];国外医学.口腔医学分册;2004年04期
10 李金忠;郑家伟;张志愿;;西妥昔单抗联合化疗或放疗治疗晚期头颈鳞癌的疗效评价(英文)[J];上海口腔医学;2008年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 张萍;;酪氨酸蛋白激酶7在头颈鳞癌中异常表达及其功能研究[A];中国肿瘤内科进展 中国肿瘤医师教育(2014)[C];2014年
2 陈万涛;冯芝恩;崔志滨;徐殠;杨细虎;孙强;李志会;潘劲松;;头颈鳞癌分子分类生物标志物的初步研究[A];第十二次全国医学遗传学学术会议论文汇编[C];2014年
3 陈万涛;张萍;张志愿;MA Kuriakose;;头颈鳞癌发生相关基因的高通量筛选和验证[A];2004年口腔颌面肿瘤基础研究学术研讨会会议日程及论文集[C];2004年
4 杨焕;刘世喜;梁传余;彭文珍;;阳离子脂质体介导小鼠白细胞介素2基因治疗头颈鳞癌的抗肿瘤作用研究[A];中国免疫学会第四届学术大会会议议程及论文摘要集[C];2002年
5 李生娇;郭伟;;18F-FDGPET/CT诊断头颈鳞癌及其淋巴结转移的临床评价[A];第八次全国口腔颌面—头颈肿瘤会议论文汇编[C];2009年
6 邱元正;刘勇;谢从良;田勇泉;张欣;肖健云;李波;;HMGB1在头颈鳞癌中的表达及其临床意义[A];2010全国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中青年学术会议论文汇编[C];2010年
7 唐平章;;颈部淋巴结转移癌的外科治疗[A];第三届中国肿瘤学术大会教育论文集[C];2004年
8 ;Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of PF regimen in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma:A meta-analysis[A];海峡两岸2008口腔癌诊治与修复重建新进展研讨会论文集[C];2008年
9 刘利军;刘勇;余长云;谭浩蕾;李果;粟忠武;田勇泉;张欣;;PHF8在头颈鳞癌中的表达及临床意义[A];全国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科中青年学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
10 马建刚;李晓明;;乙酰肝素酶和VEGF在头颈鳞癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[A];中华医学会第十次全国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学术会议论文汇编(上)[C];2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 余长云;MTDH介导AKT信号通路调控头颈鳞癌侵袭转移的实验研究[D];中南大学;2013年
2 孙金杰;Caveolin-1调控头颈鳞癌侵袭转移的分子机制研究[D];中南大学;2010年
3 戴耀章;RCP与头颈鳞癌侵袭转移及预后的相关性研究[D];中南大学;2012年
4 刘勇;EphA2调控头颈鳞癌侵袭转移的体内外实验研究[D];中南大学;2012年
5 徐婷;BMP4诱导头颈鳞癌细胞上皮—间质转化及其转移的分子机制研究[D];中南大学;2010年
6 柒琳;Trop2调控头颈鳞癌侵袭转移及化疗敏感性的分子机制研究[D];中南大学;2011年
7 刘铮铮;iASPP调控头颈鳞癌生长增殖、侵袭及化疗敏感性的实验研究[D];中南大学;2013年
8 李会政;ERCC1 262G>T遗传变异与头颈鳞癌放疗效果相关[D];中国协和医科大学;2008年
9 曾泉;头颈鳞癌中HLA-I类抗原加工递呈分子异常表达及其临床意义[D];中国协和医科大学;2009年
10 邹剑;载ATM反义寡核苷酸纳米粒对小鼠头颈鳞癌放射增敏基因治疗的实验研究[D];四川大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈春丽;头颈鳞癌患者外周血中骨桥蛋白和基质金属蛋白酶-9的临床研究意义[D];天津医科大学;2013年
2 龙宇;105例头颈鳞癌和59例头颈慢性炎症患者中高危型人乳头状瘤病毒感染率初步调查及基因变异分析[D];泸州医学院;2011年
3 蔡永聪;四川地区头颈鳞癌中人乳头状瘤病毒DNA表达的初步调查[D];广西医科大学;2010年
4 余长云;TGF-β1调控头颈鳞癌上皮—间质转化及其侵袭的实验研究[D];中南大学;2010年
5 谢丛良;HMGB1在头颈鳞癌中的表达及其与临床预后的关系[D];中南大学;2010年
6 刘法昱;CCR7通过mTOR路径调控头颈鳞癌细胞顺铂化疗作用的研究[D];中国医科大学;2008年
7 谭浩蕾;EphA2介导p38MAPK信号通路调控VEGF表达的实验研究[D];中南大学;2012年
8 黄美玲;Sp1介导miR-375调控头颈鳞癌生长和侵袭的实验研究[D];中南大学;2014年
9 张文忠;PD98059对CCL19调节人头颈鳞癌细胞侵袭迁移的作用[D];中国医科大学;2010年
10 赵景会;STAT3与头颈鳞癌顺铂耐药的相关性研究[D];天津医科大学;2009年
,本文编号:2324530
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/zlx/2324530.html